LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CONSUMERS IN E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS (COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA & THAILAND)
Abstract
The development of e-commerce in Indonesia and Thailand presents new challenges in consumer protection that require in-depth comparative studies. Consumers are in a relatively weak position due to limited access to inspecting goods directly, information asymmetry, and the potential risk of fraud and non-conformity of goods. This study analyzes two main research questions: first, how e-commerce transactions are regulated in Indonesia and Thailand; and second, how legal protection for consumers in e-commerce transactions compares in both countries. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with a statute approach and a comparative approach, with a descriptive analytical nature. Data are sourced from primary legal materials in the form of Indonesian and Thai laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of journals and scientific books, which are analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show fundamental differences between the two countries. Indonesia has a fragmented regulatory system in various regulations, including Law No. 8 of 1999, the ITE Law, and Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019, which creates overlapping authority, applies a limited reverse burden of proof principle that still burdens consumers, and has a dispute resolution system through the BPSK (Regional Consumer Protection Agency) that is time-consuming and has a low level of compliance. In contrast, Thailand implements integrated regulations with the Consumer Protection Act as umbrella legislation, a strict liability principle that benefits consumers by only proving product defects, losses, and causal relationships, and an efficient dispute resolution system through the OCPB and Online Dispute Resolution with a high level of compliance. The existence of the OCPB as a specialized institution with administrative, mediation, and supervisory authority is a strength of the Thai system. The study recommends that Indonesia adopt an integrated approach, strengthen institutions, and develop a technology-based system to improve the effectiveness of e-commerce consumer protection within the context of ASEAN harmonization.
Downloads
References
Kusumadewi, Y., & Sharon, G. (2022). Consumer protection law (pp. 49– 60). Institution
Fatimah Azzahrah.
Lanja, S. (2019). Legal protection for consumers in online transactions (Comparative study)
Law Number 08 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection in Indonesia and Law Number 02 of 1998 concerning Consumer Protection in Thailand)(pp. 5–8; 12–15). IAIN Jember.
Qustulani, M. (2018). Legal & Consumer Protection (pp. 35–39). PSP Nusantara Press.
Adenia, RF (2020). Legal aspects for e-commerce business actors who do not have a SIUP
based on positive Indonesian law.
Journal
Andryan Aprynaldi, DR (2024). LEX OMNIBUS: Journal of Constitutional Law and
State Administration: A Legal Review of Business Registration Obligations for E-Commerce Business Actors According to the Lex Omnibus Law: Journal of Constitutional Law and State Administration. 1, 42–52.
Benuf, K., Azhar, M., Badan, S., Hukum, K., Hukum, F., Diponegoro, U., Hukum, P., &
Contemporary, M. (2020). Legal Research Methodology as an Instrument for Analyzing Contemporary Legal Problems. Echoes of Justice Journal Echoes of Justice Journal. 7, 20–33.
Fauzah Nur Aksa, Siska Mona Widia, SH (2025). Comparison of Research Methods
Normative Jurisprudence and Empirical Jurisprudence: Research at UIN Sjech M Djamil Djambek 1. 12(6), 2226–2236.
Irlan Anugrah, IS (2022). Legal protection for consumers and business actors in
online buying and selling transactions. 6(2), 2613–2623.
Kungsung, T. (2025). Consumer Protection for Online Shopping: Cases of Consumers Being
Damaged by Unsafe Products in Thailand Academic article. 11(2).
Nasution, EY (2020). The Development of E-Commerce Business Transactions on Growth
Economy in Indonesia. 3(2), 506–519.
Salamat, PA (2022, June). Consumer Protection Against the Implementation of Standard
Clauses In Credit Agreements at Pawnshops. In National Seminar on Law, Social and Economics (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 475-485).
Suttawa, E. (2020). Practical Problems In The Implementation Of Sections 308 And 309 Of
The Thai Civil Procedure Code.
Poom Moolsilpa, Pornpen Traiphong, PJ (2022). THE IMPACT OF ENFORCEMENT OF
THE PERSONAL DATA. June.
Puteri Asyifa Octavia Apandy, Melawati, PA (2021). Business: Complete with Studies
Law. 3(1).
Rattanakul, P. (2023). The Personal Data Protection Act B . E. 2562 ( 2019 ) for Humans
Resources Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of Mahidol
University.
Constitution
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen,
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Undang-undang Hukum Perdata ( KUH PERDATA)
Undang-Undang Thailand (Product Liability Act B.E. 2551 (2008)
Copyright (c) 2026 Indri Yani Dewi, Padian Adi Salamat Siregar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




