THE URGENCY OF REVISING THE REGULATIONS ON LEGAL REVIEW EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE AND LEGAL CERTAINTY
Abstract
Law enforcement in the Indonesian rule of law, based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, aims to achieve justice, legal certainty, and utility in a balanced manner. However, in practice, there are still various problems, such as the declining public trust in law enforcement agencies and inconsistencies in judicial decisions. One of the crucial problems is the regulation of the legal remedy of judicial review (PK) which still places the authority of examination and decision-making in the same institution, namely the Supreme Court, thereby potentially causing conflicts of interest and reducing the objectivity of the judiciary. This research aims to analyze the urgency of renewing the regulation of judicial review in realizing justice and legal certainty. The research method used is normative legal research with a library approach, thru the analysis of relevant primary and secondary legal materials. The research results indicate that reform of the review regulation is necessary thru the strengthening of checks and balances mechanisms, including considering the involvement of other institutions outside the Supreme Court and the reaffirmation of the novum criteria as the main requirement for submitting a review. Thus, these reforms are expected to enhance the effectiveness of the review as an instrument of justice and strengthen the integrity of the judicial system in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Arifin, Z. (2019). Penafsiran novum dalam peninjauan kembali perkara pidana. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 7(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i2.610
Ashady, S., Nurdin, N., & Jiwantara, F. A. (2023). Kajian yuridis tentang upaya hukum peninjauan kembali dalam sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah dan Karya Mahasiswa, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma.v1i3.363
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pokok-pokok hukum tata negara Indonesia pasca reformasi. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Basah, S. (1985). Eksistensi dan tolok ukur badan peradilan administrasi. Alumni.
Basah, S. (1985). Eksistensi peradilan administrasi. Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22212/jh.v1i1
Fauzi, A. (2014). Peninjauan kembali oleh jaksa dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.37-48
Gunarto, M. P. (2009). Mengembalikan pelaksanaan peninjauan kembali sesuai asas hukum. Mimbar Hukum. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16273
Halim, Y., & Salim, H. (2019). Keabsahan putusan pengadilan yang belum inkracht sebagai novum. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 2(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v2n1.p86-104
Harahap, M. Y. (2000). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan sidang pengadilan, banding, kasasi, dan peninjauan kembali (Edisi ke-2). Sinar Grafika.
Huda, N. (2021). Hukum tata negara: Sejarah, teori, dan dinamika ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Kartika, S. D. (2014). Peninjauan kembali lebih dari satu kali: Antara keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Jurnal Info Hukum, 6(6), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.22212/jih.v6i6.44
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2013). Putusan Nomor 34/PUU-XI/2013 tentang pengujian Pasal 268 ayat (3) KUHAP terhadap UUD 1945.
Marwan, A. (2019). Putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana sebagai novum dalam perkara perdata. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.327
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 4(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.30641/jph.v4i2
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Penemuan hukum dalam praktik peradilan. Jurnal Hukum, 17(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss1.art3
Mulyadi, L. (2015). Problematika peninjauan kembali dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Jurnal Yudisial, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v8i1.44
Mushodhiq, J. F. (2024). Kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap penegakan hukum di Indonesia. IKAMAS, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62361/ikamas.v4i1.151
Nugroho, R. (2021). Ketimpangan dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Politik, 12(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v12i1.15890
Pelu, F. M., Pasalbessy, J. D., & Sopacua, M. G. (2021). Kekuatan hukum alat bukti (novum) dalam pemeriksaan perkara peninjauan kembali. Tatohi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(6), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i6.642
Pratiwi, D., & Widodo, A. (2022). Kepercayaan publik terhadap lembaga hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 18(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.22212/jhi.v18i2.1923
Pravidjayanto, M. R., & Candra, M. (2023). Kualifikasi novum pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Qonun: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21093/qj.v8i1.8169
Ramadani, F., Buana, A. P., & Hambali, A. R. (2024). Novum in judicial review: Instrument of justice or mere procedural formality? Advanced Private Legal Insights. https://doi.org/10.56087/58qd9h48
Salim, H., Halim, Y., & Tirayo, A. (2019). Keberadaan novum dalam peninjauan kembali perkara pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2629
Siregar, H. (2020). Disparitas putusan hakim dalam perkara pidana. Jurnal Yudisial, 13(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v13i2.412
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif. Jurnal Metodologi Hukum, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22212/jmh.v1i1
Suhariyanto, B. (2015). Aspek hukum peninjauan kembali lebih dari satu kali dalam perkara pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(2), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.335-350
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22212/jis.v10i1
Copyright (c) 2026 Resi Nurul Hasanah, Alfies Sihombing, Yeni Nuraeni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
