THE NEW PARADIGM FOR JUDGES IN DECIDING CRIMINAL CASES: BALANCING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE

Suviana Suwoto Mulyosudarmo; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Siti Marwiyah; Wahyu Prawesthi

doi:10.56301/awl.v8i4.2172

Suviana Suwoto Mulyosudarmo Dr. Soetomo University, Surabaya, Indonesia
Vieta Imelda Cornelis Dr. Soetomo University, Surabaya, Indonesia
Siti Marwiyah Dr. Soetomo University, Surabaya, Indonesia
Wahyu Prawesthi Dr. Soetomo University, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i4.2172

Keywords: Role of Judges, Law No. 1 of 2023, Substantive Justice, Discretion, Sentencing Guidelines

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (KUHP) marks a fundamental transformation in Indonesia’s criminal justice system, shifting the paradigm from retributive justice toward corrective, rehabilitative, and restorative justice. This research aims to analyze the transformation of the judge’s role from being a mere “mouthpiece of the law” (la bouche de la loi) to becoming a progressive legal finder (rechtsvinding), while examining the balancing mechanism between formal legal certainty and substantive justice. Using a normative legal research method with conceptual and statutory approaches, this study finds that the new Criminal Code grants broad humanistic discretionary power to judges. This is reflected in Article 12 regarding the recognition of living law, Article 51 concerning holistic sentencing guidelines, and Article 54 regarding judicial pardon. The research findings emphasize that this new role requires judges to perform individualized sentencing that considers the subjective condition of the perpetrator and the restoration of the victim. However, the flexibility of this discretion brings consequences regarding the urgency of moral integrity and the accountability of legal reasoning (ratio decidendi). Without solid ethical standards, discretion risks falling into judicial arbitrariness. This research concludes that the success of national criminal law reform depends heavily on the intellectual readiness of judges to harmonize statutory texts with the sense of justice embedded within society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, S., & Fahrudin, M. H. (2024). THE IMPACT OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ON ADDRESSING JUVENILE OFFENSES THE IMPACT OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ON ADDRESSING JUVENILE OFFENSES. Awang Long Law Review, 7(1), 192-197. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v7i1.1482

Dewi, C. K. N. (2024). Discussing justice from the judge's bench: A review of roles, challenges, and ethics in the judicial system. TERANG: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 1(2), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i2.368

Dewi, E. (2010). The role of judges in Indonesian criminal law enforcement. Pranata Hukum, 5(2), 91–98.

Indonesia. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Secretariat of State.

Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2023 Number 1. Secretariat of State.

Lotulung, P. M. (2003). Jurisprudence as a source of law. Mahkamah Agung RI.

Manulang, N., Azzahra, I. K., Widowati, S. A., & Kamal, U. (2025). No viral no justice: A criminological review of social media-based law enforcement from the perspective of progressive law. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan.

Nirwan, T. (2024). Juridical analysis regarding the procedures and functions of judges in juvenile criminal cases. Consensus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 15–20.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Progressive law: A synthesis of Indonesian law. Genta Publishing.

Sengkey, R. T., Pilander, M. C., Lumintang, A., & Putong, D. D. (2023). Juridical analysis of the role of judges in law enforcement. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 6(12), 83–92.

Syarifullah, M., Fathonah, R., & Farid, M. (2025). Analysis of juridical implications for fines regulation in the national Criminal Code. Jurnal Era Publikasi, 3(9).

Thamrin, H., Thamrin, M. A., Fahrudin, M. H., & Ribeiro, L. (2026). THE STATE OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY: THE REALITY OF STATE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA. Awang Long Law Review, 8(2), 514-517. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i2.2028

Trisno, T., Keke, A., & Manguntara, L. (2020). The principle of criminal individualization in tax crime cases. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(2).

W, Yuliana Y., et al. (2025). Punishment dynamics in the modern era: Between restorative and retributive justice. Jurnal Era Publikasi, 9(2).

Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2014). The urgency of reforming Indonesian substantive criminal law based on divine values. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(1).

Yusuf DM, M., Fadhilah, F., Napitupulu, A. M., Lubis, R. E., Sartono, S. A., Mahfuzoh, & Alghani, R. D. (2023). Analysis of the role of judges in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(2), 392–397.