FACTOR ANALYSIS ENFORCEMENT LAW AGAINST CRIMINAL ACTS OF ABUSE PERFORMED BY STUDENTS

Rezki Auliyah; Hijrah  Adhyanti Mirzana2; Audyna Mayasari Muin

doi:10.56301/awl.v5i2.765

Rezki Auliyah Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana2 Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
Audyna Mayasari Muin Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i2.765

Keywords: Law Enforcement, Criminal Act, Prosecution Student, Restorative Justice

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the application of criminal law in response to acts of mistreatment done by students in Parepare City, as well as the factors that influence the application of criminal law in response to criminal acts of mistreatment committed by students in Parepare City. This study was carried out with the help of empirical research methodologies, including primary and secondary data, as well as data collection methods including interviews, observations, and analyses of published literature. After all of the preliminary and secondary data have been collected, they are then subjected to a qualitative analysis, after which they are characterized descriptively and organized systematically. According to the findings of the research, (1) the enforcement of criminal law in Parepare City against criminal actions of persecution conducted by students is not operating at an optimal level. Because of this, the administration of criminal law is conducted using a restorative justice approach at all stages of the process, including investigation, prosecution, and examination in court; (2) The legal and statutory considerations, law enforcement apparatus factors, and community factors are the three categories of elements that have an impact on how the criminal law is enforced in Parepare City in relation to the crime of persecution committed by students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis. Toko Gunung Agung.

Arief, B. N. (2002). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Bergseth, K. J., & Bouffard, J. A. (2012). Examining the Effectiveness of a Restorative Justice Program for Various Types of Juvenile Offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(9), 1054â€“1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12453551

Dekker, S. W. A., & Breakey, H. (2016). â€˜Just culture:â€™ Improving safety by achieving substantive, procedural and restorative justice. Safety Science, 85, 187â€“193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2016.01.018

Gunadi, I., & Efendi, J. (2016). Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana. Kencana Divisi dari Prenadamedia group.

Irwansyah, I. (2020). Penelitian Hukum (Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel). Mirra Buana Media.

Kadarudin, K. (2021). Penelitian Di Bidang Ilmu Hukum (Sebuah Pemahaman Awal). Formaci Press.

Muchtar, M. I. (2017). Pendidikan Karakter; Garansi Peradaban Berkemajuan. ARBAWI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 130â€“138. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/tarbawi/article/view/1032

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Nasution, J. B. (2008). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mandar Maju.

Noprianto, F. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tinda Pidana Pengeroyokan Penganiayaan Dan Pengerusakan Yang Dilakukan Antara Mahasiswa Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak. Jurnal Hukum Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Untan (Jurnal Mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Hukum) Universitas Tanjungpura, 4(1). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jmfh/article/view/13696/12284

Nurmansyah, G., Hartono, B., & Rapita, M. (2021). Implementasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Para Mahasiswa Sebagai Pelaku Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Nomor 13/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gdt). PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 7(2), 160â€“173. https://doi.org/10.33751/PALAR.V7I2.3776

Pavlacic, J. M., Kellum, K. K., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2022). Advocating for the Use of Restorative Justice Practices: Examining the Overlap between Restorative Justice and Behavior Analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1237â€“1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40617-021-00632-1

Pramuji, S. E., & Putri, V. S. (2020). Meninjau Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Penataan Ruang dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Tertib Tata Ruang. Jurnal Pertanahan ATR/BPN.

Rakinaung, V. Y. (2019). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Pengacara Yang Dengan Sengaja Menghalangi, Mempersulit Jalannya Penyidikan, Penuntutan Serta Proses Peradilan Terhadap Terdakwa Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. LEX CRIMEN, 8(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/25669

Rumadan, I. (2017). Peran Lembaga Peradilan Sebagai Institusi Penegak Hukum Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Bagi Terwujudnya Perdamaian. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 69â€“87. https://doi.org/10.33331/RECHTSVINDING.V6I1.128

Sadikin, A. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kehutanan Pasca Berlakunya Perdirjen Ksdae Tentang Kemitraan Konservasi The Legal Protection Against The Of Crime Forestry After Being Available The Regulation Of Perdirjen Ksdae Concerning With The Conservation Of Partnership. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24970/bhl.v5i2.159

Soekanto, S. (2010). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tribun News. (n.d.). Mahasiswa Poltekkes Makassar Mengaku Dianiaya Senior saat Ospek. Https://Www.Tribunnews.Com/Regional/2015/08/14/12-Mahasiswa-Poltekkes- Makassar-Mengaku-Dianiaya-Senior-Saat-Ospek.