TINDAKAN YURIDIS DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 59/G/2021/PTUN.MDN: ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA
Abstract
Legal and non-legal considerations of judges in decision number 59/G/2021/PTUN.Mdn Does Decision Number 59/G/2021/PTUN.Mdn reflect the embodiment of the theory of justice? This study also uses a legal analysis method for normative case numbers, namely the author analyzes the context of the State Administrative Court decision Number 59/G/2021/PTUN.Mdn which is then drawn to existing legal regulations, in this case the Law on State Administrative Courts. The Decree of the Regent of Deli Serdang No. 00174/21212/TAP/03/21 dated March 25, 2021 concerning Honorable Dismissal Not at Own Request and Provision of Pension in the name of Dinawati Tarigan is in accordance with the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (2) letter (a) of Law No. 9 of 2004 concerning the First Amendment to Law No. 5 decisions of the State Administrative Court that were challenged were contrary to regulations In addition to legal considerations based on laws and regulations, judges also consider non-legal aspects in making decisions. The Decree of the Regent of Deli Serdang No. 00174/21212/TAP/03/21 dated March 25, 2021 concerning Honorable Dismissal Not at Own Request and Provision of Pension in the name of Dinawati Tarigan was declared invalid by the State Administrative Court.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, R. (1992). Hukum acara peradilan tata usaha negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Abdullah, R. (2007). Hukum acara peradilan tata usaha negara (Cetakan kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harmoko. (2019). Pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1).
Koorag, S., et al. (2021). Terjadinya sengketa tata usaha negara akibat dikeluarkannya keputusan pejabat tata usaha negara. Lex Administratum, 9(7), 75–85.
Prasetyo, H., Praherdhiono, H., Hidayati, A., Iftitah, K. N., Kurniawan, C., & Fajarianto, O. (2023). Weakness analysis of medical image watermarking using RDWT and SVD. In 2023 1st International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technologies (ICONNIC) (pp. 24–28). Kediri, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONNIC59854.2023.10467489
Suyitno, I., & Bustanil, M. S. (2016). Faktor pengaruh dalam pertimbangan hakim memutus sengketa tata usaha negara di bidang kepegawaian (Studi pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar). Jurnal Tomalebbi, 3(1), 89–96.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang perubahan pertama atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Copyright (c) 2024 Reny Okprianti, Nur Husni Emilson, Salsabila Nariyah, Aisyah Febryta Sauly, Febriansyah Akbar, Ahmad Subari, Royen Frananda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
