PERAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA SEBAGAI WASIT SEKALIGUS HAKIM DALAM EKONOMI

Ratna Dewi; Helmin Porang Timori; Moh. K. Aripin S; Ali Zakariya; Audrey Aulia Putri; Markus Taena; Andiera Eko Ramadhanty

doi:10.56301/csj.v7i2.1417

Ratna Dewi Universitas Bung Karno
Helmin Porang Timori Universitas Bung Karno
Moh. K. Aripin S Universitas Bung Karno
Ali Zakariya Universitas Bung Karno
Audrey Aulia Putri Universitas Bung Karno
Markus Taena Universitas Bung Karno
Andiera Eko Ramadhanty Universitas Bung Karno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v7i2.1417

Keywords: Tax, Ultimum Remedium, Taxpayer

Abstract

The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is a state institution that has a crucial role in maintaining balance and fairness in the dynamics of the Indonesian market. As a supervisor of business competition, KPPU functions as a referee who ensures that all business actors play by the same rules. Its main task is to prevent monopolistic practices, cartels, and other unfair competition that can harm consumers and hinder economic growth. The purpose of this study is to determine the problems faced by KPPU in carrying out its duties. The research method used is normative juridical. The data analysis is by using the Qualitative method. The results of the study are that in carrying out its duties, KPPU still faces a number of challenges. One of the main challenges is the increasing complexity of business competition cases, especially along with the development of technology and globalization. In addition, KPPU also needs to continue to improve the capacity of its human resources in order to handle cases more quickly and effectively. The conclusion is that KPPU needs to continue to make various efforts, such as strengthening coordination with related institutions, increasing public awareness of the importance of healthy business competition, and developing information technology to support the supervision process. KPPU also needs to continue to conduct studies and research to understand the latest developments in market dynamics and business competition. In the increasingly developing digital era, KPPU also needs to pay attention to the development of digital technology and its impact on business competition. For example, KPPU needs to anticipate the potential for monopolies or cartels in digital platforms, and ensure that digital innovation does not hinder healthy competition. By carrying out its dual role as referee and judge effectively, KPPU can contribute significantly to realizing a fair, efficient, and competitive Indonesian economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badan Legislasi DPR RI, "Naskah Akademik RUU tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat," Jakarta: DPR RI, 2020.

Dudung Mulyadi dan Ibnu Rusydi. (2017). Efektivitas Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Kasus Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Galuh Justisi Volume 5 No. 1 Maret 2017.

Fendy. (2016). Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Mendorong Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat Di Sektor Motor Skuter Matic. https://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/11602/1/JURNAL.pdf.

Hanif Lutfiari Prasetyo, Suparji Ahmad, Anas Lutfi. (2024). Pengawasan KPPU Pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah Dalam Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Era Digital. Jurnal Binamulia Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.646

KPPU. (2020). Laporan Tahunan KPPU Tahun 2020. Jakarta: KPPU.

Laporan Tahunan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia. (2021). Jakarta: Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.

Meita Fadhilah. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usahan Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorail. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 3 No,. 1 Maret 2019.

Mulyana, A. (2020). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ning Herlina. (2019). Kewenangan KPPU (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Antimonopoli. Jurnal Les Lata, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Juli 2019.

Ningsih, Ayup Suran. (2019). Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.207-215.

OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct © OECD 2018, https://www.oecd.org/investment/due-diligence-guidance-forresponsible-business-conduct.htm.

Olivya dan Zulfikar Judge. (2023). Analisa Hukum Penetapan Harga Dalam Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No 2 April 2023. 10.58344/jhi.v2i2.45

Rian Benedictus Rumagit. (2024). Analisis Putusan KPPU yang Melampaui Kewenangan Berdasarkan UU Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Supremasi Vol 14 No. 2 https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.3805

Putri Noviyanti, Rika Azizah, Dr. Jacobus Jopie Gilalo, dan R. Yuniar Anisa. (2023). Fungsi Dan Peran Lembaga KPPU Dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Karimah Tauhid Vol. 2 No. 3 https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i3.8789

Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2020). Economics of The Public Sector. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Suparman, S. (2022). Teori Hukum Ekonomi dan Penerapannya dalam Regulasi Persaingan Usaha. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media.

Wien Sukarmini dan Norman Syahdar Idrus. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip Efektivitas Dan Prinsip Transparansi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Persaingan Usaha Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i1.1844