IMPLIKASI PERKEMBANGAN KECERDASAN ARTIFISIAL TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM INTERNASIONAL

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, International Law, ASEAN, AI Governance

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed various public and private sectors. Despite its efficiency and innovative potential, the use of AI poses serious risks to the protection of Human Rights, including violations of privacy, discriminatory algorithmic bias, and threats to freedom of expression and the right to a fair trial. The primary challenge in international law lies in the borderless nature of AI, while no binding international legal instrument specifically regulates accountability in its use. This study aims to analyze international legal standardization in mitigating human rights violations caused by AI systems and to compare AI regulatory approaches among ASEAN countries. This research employs a normative juridical method using conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that AI regulation in the ASEAN region remains fragmented and predominantly relies on soft law mechanisms rather than binding legal norms. Singapore demonstrates the most systematic AI governance framework, while Indonesia is still in the process of developing a comprehensive national policy. This study contributes to international legal discourse by emphasizing the urgency of establishing a binding international convention on AI and strengthening regional regulatory harmonization to ensure effective human rights protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASEAN Secretariat. (2024). ASEAN guide on AI governance and ethics. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical challenges. Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), 1–21.

European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/… of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707.

Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.

United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. GA Res. 217A (III), UN Doc A/810.

United Nations. (1966). International covenant on civil and political rights. 999 UNTS 171.

United Nations Human Rights Council. (2021). The right to privacy in the digital age. UN Doc. A/HRC/48/31.

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.

Published
2026-06-03
How to Cite
Widjaja, L. (2026). IMPLIKASI PERKEMBANGAN KECERDASAN ARTIFISIAL TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM INTERNASIONAL. The Juris, 10(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v10i1.2086