LEGAL EFFECTS ON CONTROL OF RIGHTS TO LAND OF THE FORMER EIGENDOM VERPONDING STATE IN DISPUTES BETWEEN HEIRS THE MULLER FAMILY WITH CITIZENS OF DAGO ELOS BANDUNG
Abstract
Indonesia's Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) sets out the requirements for the conversion of verponding eigendom land, regulating the rights of Westerners to be included in the applicable land law system. Based on the UUPA, land rights must be converted until September 24 1980. However, there are still frequent claims of land ownership resulting from eigendom disputes that have not been legally resolved, which causes land disputes. Case of verponding eigendom land dispute between the heirs of the Muller Family, PT. Dago Inti Graha versus Dago Elos residents is a clear example of the complexity that can occur in land ownership issues. Since it started in 2016, this dispute has been decided four times, one of which was at the PK level with Case Register Number 109 PK/Pdt/2022. Normative juridical and analytical descriptive approaches, in legal studies and relevant legal cases are analyzed. Result: According to the provisions of UUPA and its implementing regulations, as well as Government Regulation no. 24 of 1997, if there is no land eigendom verponding convention, the land then becomes state property. Through the trial, the Panel of Judges considered that the heirs of the Muller Family had succeeded in proving that they were the legal holders of land rights, compared to the claims of Dago Elos Residents who did not have proof of ownership and that the Muller Family heirs had more complete and valid supporting documents than the Residents. Dago Elos. Based on these considerations, the judge decided that the heirs of the Muller family had stronger and more legal rights to the disputed land than the Dago Elos residents. Therefore, the legal consequences for control of disputed land are that the heirs of the Muller family have the right to register the land and obtain legal recognition of ownership of the disputed land.
Downloads
References
Faisal, L. M. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Ilmiah Rinjani, 5(1), 32.
Faisal, L. M. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Ilmiah Rinjani, 5(1), 33.
Febrianty, A. S., Gagarin, M. G., & Abas, M. (2014). The Juridical Review Of Interfaith Marriage Is Linked To Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage As Amended By Law Number 16 Of 2019 Concerning Marriage (Determination Study Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby). Justisi, 9(1), 65.
Harsono, B. (2013). Hukum Agraria Indonesia (Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi Dan Pelaksanaannya). Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.
https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id.
Keputusan Presiden Nomor 32 Tahun 1979 tentang Pokok-Pokok Kebijaksanaan Dalam Rangka Pemberian Hak Baru Atas Tanah Asal Konversi Hak-Hak Barat.
Mahendra, & dkk. (2016). Kekuatan Hukum Sertpikat Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 191/B/2014/PT.TU.Sby. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 48.
Mahendra, & dkk. (2016). Kekuatan Hukum Sertpikat Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 191/B/2014/PT.TU.Sby. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 56.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Mujiburohman, D. A. (2016). Problematika Pengaturan Tanah Negara Bekas Hak Yang Telah Berakhir. Bhumi; Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 2(2), 151.
Mujiburohman, D. A. (2021). Legalisasi Tanah-Tanah Bekas Hak Eigendom. Yudisial, 14(1), 117.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Satuan Rumah Susun, Dan Pendaftaran Tanah.
Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 2 Tahun 1960 tentang Pelaksanaan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 3 Tahun 1979 tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Mengenai Permohonan Dan Pemberian Hak Baru Atas Tanah Asal Konversi Hak-Hak Barat.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bandung Nomor 454/Pdt.G/2016/PN Bdg.
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 570/Pdt/2017/PT Bdg.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 934 K/Pdt/2019.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 109 PK/Pdt/2022.
Parlindungan, A. P. (2001). Berakhirnya Hak-Hak Atas Tanah Menurut Sistem UUPA (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria). Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Parlindungan, A. P. (2009). Pendaftaran Tanah Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Sanjaya, S., & Rahmatiar, Y. (2024). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Agraria. Yogyakarta: K-Media.
Santoso, U. (2017). Hukum Agraria; Kajian Komprehenshif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Soekanto, S., & Taneko, S. B. (2011). Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Surya, A. S., Rahmatiar, Y., & Asad, F. (2024). The Juridical Review Of The Marriage Ban Of Indigenous Peoples Of Mirah Village And Golan Village, Sukorejo, District, Ponorogo Regency Is Reviewed From Law Number 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage. Justisi, 9(1), 45.
Syarif, E. (2012). Menuntaskan Sengketa Tanah Melalui Pengadilan Khusus Pertanahan. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Popular Gramedia.
Syukur, A. N., & dkk. (2022). The Analysis Of Judge’s Decisions In Dago Elos Against Muller’s Family Case: Juridical Analysis Of The Supreme Court Decision Number 109 PK/Pdt/2022. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 4(1), 57.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1847 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang-Undang Nomor 86 Tahun 1958 tentang Nasionalisasi Perusahaan-Perusahaan Belanda.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1960 tentang Penguasaan Benda Tetap Milik Perseorangan Warga Negara Belanda.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Copyright (c) 2024 Anggraeni Asnanda, Yuniar Rahmatiar, Muhamad Abas, Suyono Sanjaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
