LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST HOLDERS OF REGISTERED BRAND "PUMA AND CAT JUMPING" FOR SIMILARITY TO FAMOUS BRANDS

  • Sabrina Dewi Putri Wibowo Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Lia Amalia UNIVERSITAS BUANA PERJUANGAN KARAWANG
  • Muhamad Abas UNIVERSITAS BUANA PERJUANGAN KARAWANG
Keywords: Indonesia, Famous Brands, Legal Protection

Abstract

This research focuses on two important aspects: The research will delve deeply into laws related to well-known brands in Indonesia and the research will analyze specific cases that have been decided by the courts, such as case Number 16/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Brand/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.Well-known brands are usually highly valued because they spend money on advertising and promotion, and become more popular around the world. In addition, it obtains legal protection through trademark registration in different countries, which gives them exclusive rights to their trademarks and allows others to use them illegally. The Trademark Law in Indonesia provides special protection for well-known brands. However, trademark infringement still occurs in Indonesia. Normative juridical research, with legislation and case approaches on legal protection of well-known brands in Indonesia. Result: The Trademark Law provides a clear framework for the legal protection of well-known trademarks in Indonesia, both preventively and restrictively, in particular Article 21, Article 83 and Explanation of Article 76 paragraph (2). In decision Number 16/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Brand/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst, the Commercial Court considered evidence showing that the  Defendant deliberately took advantage of the reputation of the "PUMA and Jumping Cat" brand without permission or license. The Commercial Court decided to cancel the registration of the Defendant's trademark "PUMA and Jumping Cats" because the action infringed the Plaintiff's trademark rights. This decision was made to protect the Claimant from its legitimate trademark rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES

Abas, M., Dewi, S., & Rizki, Y. (2021). Analisis pelaksanaan Perjanjian Jam Kerja Antara Perusahaan Dengan Pekerja Di PT. Plasindo Lestari Dihubungkan Dengan Pasal 77 Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Justisi Hukum, 6(2), 29.

Amaliya, L., Abas, M., & Akbar, M. G. (2022). Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Utang Piutang Yang Dibuat Dalam Bentuk Akta Di Bawah Tangan. Justisi Hukum, 7(1), 4.

Arifin, Z., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar. Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 59.

Arifin, Z., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar. Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 60.

Bafadhal, T. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia: Kasus IKEA. Jurnal Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 28.

Candra, I. (2012). Politik Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Dharmawan, N. K., & dkk. (2016). Buku Ajar Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Dipetik Mei 2024, dari Tesis Hukum: http://tesishukum.com/pengertian-perlindungan-hukum-menurut-para-ahli/.

Ferdian, M. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Jujur. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2), 88.

Hariyani, I. (2010). Prosedur Mengurus HAKI Yang Benar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

Hidayati, N. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek Yang Terdaftar. Ragam Jurnal Pengembangan Humanivora, 11(3), 180.

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 1997 Tentang Perubahan Keppres 24 Tahun 1979 Tentang Pengesahan Paris Convention For The Protection of Industrial Property dan Convention Establishing The World Intellectual Property Organization.

ND, M. F., & dkk. (2018). Iktikad Tidak Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek Di Indonesia. Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 220.

Purwaka, T. H. (2017). Perlindungan Merek. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 16/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.

Rangkuti, F. (2004). The Power Of Brands. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Syafira, V. T. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Superman Terhadap pelanggaran Merek. Suara Hukum, 3(1), 94.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 Tentang Pengesahan WTO (Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.

Usman, R. (2003). Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Utomo, T. S. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Di Era Globalisasi: Sebuah Kajian Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

(2023, 7 17). Diambil kembali dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung: https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id

(t.thn.).

Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Dewi Putri Wibowo, S., Amalia, L., & Abas, M. (2024). LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST HOLDERS OF REGISTERED BRAND "PUMA AND CAT JUMPING" FOR SIMILARITY TO FAMOUS BRANDS. Awang Long Law Review, 6(2), 508-513. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v6i2.1197