LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTERING BODY HEALTH PARTICIPANTS

Muhamad Irayadi

doi:10.56301/awl.v6i2.1308

Muhamad Irayadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v6i2.1308

Keywords: Legal Protection, Participants, BPJS

Abstract

In order to legally protect the rights of patients participating in the Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) of Health in obtaining health services, the government issued Law Number 24 of 2011, which stipulates that two state-owned enterprises, namely PT Askes (Persero) and PT Jamsostek (Persero) were transformed into public service agencies to implement five programs mandated by Law Number 40 of 2004, namely the health insurance program for BPJS Health and other programs are handed over to BPJS Employment. This study aims to analyze how to protect BPJS Health participants. This study uses a normative legal research method with field data as a complement. The results of the study Legal protection for BPJS Health participants who are hospitalized in hospitals from the regulatory aspect have protected their rights both as consumers of services, as hospital patients and as BPJS Health participants. The method of resolving BPJS Health service disputes through mediation reflects the importance of a consensual approach to dispute resolution. Mediation is chosen for several theoretical reasons, such as the dominance of a culture that prioritizes harmony and togetherness, and the balance of power between the disputing parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BBC NEWS indonesia. (2023). Tindakan nakes “bedakan pasien BPJS” dikecam publik, “sangat tidak pantas” - Pegiat: “Itu bentuk kecurangan dan paling banyak terjadi di rumah sakit.” BBC.Com. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cn06g268n6vo

BPJS. (2021). Penerapan BPJS Kesehatan oleh pemerintah Indonesia. BPJS Kesehatan. https://bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/

Fadhilah, A. (2024). BPJS Kesehatan Optimistis Indonesia Capai UHC Tahun Ini. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7265197/bpjs-kesehatan-optimistis-indonesia-capai-uhc-tahun-ini

Fitriah, F. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pasien Peserta Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Dalam Mendapatkan Pelayanan Kesehatan. Solusi, 17(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v17i3.213

Harahap, R. A. (2021). Buku Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. In CV Merdeka Kreasi Group. CV Merdeka Kreasi Group.

Hendrik. (2013). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marbun, R., Bram, D., Isnaeni, Y., & Nusya. (2012). Kamus Hukum Lengkap (Mencakup Istilah Hukum & Perundang-Undangan Terbaru, Cetakan Pertama. Visi Media.

Mashudi. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial. CV. Jakad Publishing.

Nadhif, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Pasien BPJS Kesehatan Atas Pelayanan Kesehatan Rumah Sakit Berdasarkan UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2011. Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 1(1), 8–15. https://journal.widyakarya.ac.id/index.php/Doktrin-widyakarya/article/download/344/566

Novriansyah, V., Pasamai, S., & Anzar. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Dokter Akibat Malpraktik Medis Dalam Prespektif Hukum Perdata. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), 2(3), 957–971.

Pitoyo, W. (2010). Panduan Praktis Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Cetakan Pertama. Visi Media.

Purba, I. P. M. H., Silitonga, H. T. H., Tauran, T., & Widianti, A. (2023). Legal Protection of The Right to Health for People with Long-term Health Impact due to Disaster in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 843–870. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.71678

Rahmadi, T. (2010). Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, Cetakan ke- l. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Riswandie, I., & Khalid, A. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Terapeutik (Studi Terhadap Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata ). PROSIDING, 26–35.

Rusyad, Z. (2018). Hukum Perlindungan Pasien, Malang : Setara Press,. Setara Press.

Sari, A. R., & Silaban, M. W. (2024). Pasien BPJS Kesehatan Ditolak Berobat gara-gara Kuota, Ini Kata BPJS Watch. Tempo.Co. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1834858/pasien-bpjs-kesehatan-ditolak-berobat-gara-gara-kuota-ini-kata-bpjs-watch

Shofie, Y. (2009). Perlindungan Konsumen dan Instrumen-Instrumen Hukumnya,. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Suprapto, & Malik, A. . A. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Diskresi Pada Pelayanan Kesehatan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Kesehatan (BPJS). Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, 4(4), 527–534.

Susan, D. O., & Effendi, A. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Sinar Grafika.

Triana, N. (2019). Alternative Dispute Resolution Penyelesaian Sengketa alternatif Dengan Model Mediasi, Arbitrase, Negosiasi dan Konsiliasi. Kaizen Sarana Edukasi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2014 tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial.

Undang-Undang Nomor 44 tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit

Umam, K. (2010). Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Cetakan Pertama. Pustaka Yustisia.

Widjaja, S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien Selaku Konsumen terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik di Bidang Kesehatan. Jurnal Rechtens, 9(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i1.660

Yessy, K., & Sharon, dan G. (2022). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaga Fatimah Azzahrah.