IMPLICATIONS OF IMPLEMENTING BEHAVIOR CHANGES IN ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION BASED ON BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW

Muhammad Fauzan Hanif; Sudaryat Sudaryat; Aam  Suryamah

doi:10.56301/awl.v7i2.1524

Muhammad Fauzan Hanif Student of Master of Law Program, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
Sudaryat Sudaryat Student of Master of Law Program, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
Aam Suryamah Student of Master of Law Program, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v7i2.1524

Keywords: Abuse of Dominant Position,, Behavior Change,, Legal Construction

Abstract

Abuse of a dominant position is one type of violation that can provide an opportunity to change behavior. The mechanism for providing behavioral change in the abuse of a dominant position has implications for the KPPU, the reported party, and competing business actors. In terms of providing an opportunity to change behavior, the Commission Council considers the type of violation, the time of the violation and the losses caused by the violation. There is no further explanation regarding the criteria for providing an opportunity to change behavior, so legal construction is needed. This research was carried out using a normative juridical approach. Specifications: This research is descriptive analytical in nature, namely the data obtained will be described in this research by providing an overview of legal problems, the legal system and reviewing or analyzing them according to the needs of the research. The results of the research show the implications that arise in providing behavioral changes for violations of abuse of a dominant position which are contrary to the principle of legal certainty. Changes in behavior in the abuse of a dominant position will open up opportunities for the reporter to design abuse strategies in the future with different strategies. Per se approach indicators are needed to perfect the legal construction of providing behavioral changes for abuse of a dominant position. The KPPU can apply an alternative approach by carrying out analysis if the perpetrator abuses a dominant position at the same time committing a violation that meets the elements in another article, behavior change can be rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, K. (2024). Fungsi Hukum Pembangunan Ekonomi Dalam Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat. Lex Renaissance, 9(2), 478–505.

Alamudi, I. A. (2023). RELASI HUKUM DAN EKONOMI DALAM PENDEKATAN FILSAFAT. JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perbandingan Mazhab, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59259/jd.v3i2.62

Bernatt, M. (2024). Competition law through the lenses of national constitutions: connecting competitive markets with socio-economic and environmental values. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, jnae047.

Gunawan, A. V. (2022). UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION BY PT FORISA NUSAPERSADA AS A MARKET LEADER. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24(3), 251–268.

Harahap, M. Y. (1997). Beberapa Tinjauan Tentang Permasalahan Hukum. Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Huijbers, T. (1982). Filsafat hukum dalam lintasan sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1990.

Ibáñez Colomo, P. (2025). Remedies in EU antitrust law. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, nhae022.

Imron, M. (2024). TINJAUAN NORMATIF POSISI DOMINAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT PADA STUDI PUTUSAN PERKARA: 03/KPPU-L/2020. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 3(5), 1413–1426.

Irianto, S. (2017). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DALAM METODOLOGI PENELITIAN ILMU HUKUM. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol32.no2.1339

Jimly Asshiddiqie, S. H. (2021). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Juanda, E. (2017). Konstruksi hukum dan metode interpretasi hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4(2), 168–180.

Mahmuda, S. (2020). Prinsip Per Se Illegal dan Rule of Reason Secara Alternatif dalam Penetapan Harga Industri Jasa Freight Container (Uang Tambang) [Universitas Airlangga]. https://repository.unair.ac.id/98289/

Mandrescu, D. (2024). Designing (restorative) remedies for abuses of dominance by online platforms. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, jnae040.

Nazhari, A. F., & Irkham, N. (2023). Analisis Dugaan Praktik Predatory Pricing dan Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan dalam Industri E-Commerce. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 3(1), 19–31.

Nugroho, S. A. (2014). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Nusantara, A. H. G., & Harman, B. K. (1999). Analisa dan perbandingan undang-undang antimonopoli: undang-undang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat di Indonesia. Elex Media Komputindo: Bank Naskah Gramedia, Kelompok Gramedia.

Petit, N., & Teece, D. (2024). Capabilities: the next step for the economic construction of competition law. In Journal of European Competition Law & Practice (p. lpae073). Oxford University Press.

Prananingtyas, P., Lubis, A. F., Anggraini, A. M. T., & Toha, K. (2017). Hukum Persaingan Usaha.

Rombot, R. J. T., Anis, H., & Sepang, R. (2020). Peranan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Usaha Perdagangan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Lex Privatum, 8(4).

Rusmini, R., & Sari, J. H. (2023). Kedudukan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dalam Sistim Kenegaraan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Tri Pantang, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.51517/jhtp.v7i2.326

Safura, N. R. (2022). Sanksi Administrasi Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Melakukan Kesempatan Perubahan Perilaku Dalam Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha. Jurist-Diction, 5(4).

Sanger, B. D. N. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum. Lex Administratum, 9(3).

Sengge, A., & Umar, W. (2024). PENGAWASAN DAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM E-COMMERCE OLEH KPPU DALAM MENGATASI PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(4).

Shafa, N. B., & Haryanto, I. (2023). Penghapusan Praktik Penjualan Bersyarat oleh Google Sebagai Bentuk Persaingan Usaha Sehat di Indonesia. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.7301

Sidauruk, G. D. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Lex Renaissance, 6(1), 132–151.

Sulistiyono, A., & Rustamaji, M. (2009). Hukum Ekonomi sebagai panglima. Masmedia Buana Pustaka.

Wagner-von Papp, F. (2023). Remedies, sanctions and commitments. In Research Handbook on Abuse of Dominance and Monopolization (pp. 283–316). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Woodward, R. (2009). The organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD). Routledge.