CIVIL LAW ASPECTS OF PROBLEMATIC DELIVERIES BY PT. POS INDONESIA CENTRAL JAKARTA BRANCH: A REVIEW OF LIABILITY AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS

Reta Indah Kusmaputri; Muthia Sakti

doi:10.56301/awl.v7i2.1586

Reta Indah Kusmaputri Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Muthia Sakti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v7i2.1586

Keywords: PT. Pos Indonesia, Consumer Protection, Consumer Protection Law, Returned Goods, Customs, Non-Nicotine Cigarettes

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal responsibilities of PT. Pos Indonesia Central Jakarta Branch in protecting consumers, with a specific focus on cases of lost, damaged, and delayed deliveries. The research adopts a normative legal methodology to analyze customer complaints and return data from 2023, as well as to review relevant legal frameworks under the Consumer Protection Law and the Postal Services Law. Special attention is given to the case of YouTuber Artodipro, whose import of non-nicotine cigarettes in excess of legal limits resulted in customs seizure, highlighting the intersection of postal services and import regulations. The scope of this study encompasses the legal obligations of PT. Pos Indonesia Central Jakarta in handling consumer complaints, the effectiveness of existing complaint resolution mechanisms, and the regulatory environment governing import restrictions for non-nicotine products. The findings reveal that the top five customer complaints relate to shipment information issues, misdelivery, pre-collecting, pickup requests, and item returns. The study concludes that PT. Pos Indonesia Central Jakarta is legally liable for ensuring compliance with delivery agreements and for providing compensation in cases of delay, loss, or damage. However, current complaint resolution processes are underutilized, and there is a lack of regulatory clarity and consumer awareness regarding import restrictions. In conclusion, PT. Pos Indonesia Central Jakarta is recommended to enhance its tracking systems, increase transparency in complaint handling, and streamline return processes. The study also suggests updating importation regulations for non-nicotine products and improving consumer education on customs procedures to strengthen consumer protection and regulatory compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achsan, I. (1981). Hukum Dagang. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Aisyah, A. M., Khasna, H. W., & Turisno, B. E. (2018). Perlindungan konsumen jasa pengiriman barang dalam hal terjadi keterlambatan pengiriman barang. Jurnal Law Reform, 14(2), 153.

Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2006). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2008). Hukum perlindungan konsumen (hlm. 1). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Yanto, E. (2019). Tinjauan yuridis tanggung jawab PT. Pos Indonesia terhadap pengiriman barang konsumen. Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 65–66.

Handayani, R., Sari, D. K., & Purwanto, E. (2020). Analisis perbandingan layanan pengaduan pada perusahaan ekspedisi swasta dan BUMN. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Publik, 11(2), 122–135.

Indrawan, M. B., & Shara, M. C. P. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen jasa pengiriman barang atas kerusakan atau kehilangan barang. Jurnal Kertha Desa, 11(7), 2952–2962.

Manurung, I. M., & Ratnawati, E. (2023). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap pengguna jasa pengiriman barang (ekspedisi) terkait kehilangan paket. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 6(4).

Kurniawan, R. A., & Fauziah, D. A. (2021). Analisis kepuasan pelanggan jasa ekspedisi dalam perspektif perlindungan konsumen. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(2), 115–130.

Indrawan, M. B., & Shara, M. C. P. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen jasa pengiriman barang atas kerusakan atau kehilangan barang. Jurnal Kertha Desa, 11(7), 2952–2962.

Nadia, F. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen jasa pengiriman barang. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(8), 791–797.

Prastyanti, R. A. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen dalam transaksi jual beli online (Studi pada aplikasi Grab Toko). Sanskara Hukum dan HAM, 4(1), 98–109.

Pratama, A., & Widyastuti, L. (2023). Penyelesaian sengketa konsumen melalui BPSK: Studi efektivitas di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 11(1), 20–34.

Rasyid, M. H., Jannah, G. R., Fiana, V. A., Latisha, N., Nurfajriana, S., & Sakti, M. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban platform e-commerce terhadap penipuan oleh pelaku usaha terverifikasi yang mengakibatkan kerugian konsumen. Media Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 642.

Sakti, M., & Yuli, Y. W. (2017). Tanggung jawab Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS) dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), 77.

Santoso, S. (2022). Konsep wanprestasi dalam perjanjian jasa pengiriman barang. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 52(2), 300–314.

Siswanto, C. A., & Indradewi, A. A. (2022). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap pembelian obat mengandung psikotropika pada online marketplace. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(2), 121–135.

Susanto, A. (2008). Perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wahyuningsih, W. T. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen dan pelaku bisnis dalam bisnis digital e-commerce. Demagogi: Journal of Social Sciences, Economics and Humanities, 1(1), 34–48.

Widyastuti, P., & Wahyuningtyas, S. Y. (2021). Tanggung jawab mutlak dalam hukum perlindungan konsumen: Implikasi bagi pelaku usaha jasa. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9(1), 45–58.

Widyastuti, R. A., & Wahyuningtyas, D. P. (2021). The development of employee selection decision support system at PT Pos Indonesia. JCRBE (Journal of Current Research in Business and Economics, 3(1), 1004–1040.

Yanto, E. (2019). Tinjauan yuridis tanggung jawab PT. Pos Indonesia terhadap pengiriman barang konsumen. Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 65–66.