LEGAL COMPLIANCE IN THE FOREIGN FRANCHISE SECTOR: EXAMINING THE ALIGNMENT BETWEEN FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS AND BUSINESS LICENSING IN INDONESIA

  • Muhammad Al Haadi Nugraha Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Indriya Fathni Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi, Indonesia
  • Ridha Kurniawan Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Herlina Damanik Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi, Indonesia
  • Agus Irawan Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Keywords: franchis business licensing, STPW, regulatory disharmony, legal certainty

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal implications of regulatory disharmony between Government Regulation No. 35/2024 on Franchises and Government Regulation No. 28/2025 on Risk-Based Business Licensing, focusing on the position of the Franchise Registration Certificate (STPW) within the Online Single Submission (OSS) system. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the research relies on secondary legal materials legislation, scholarly works, and prior studies examined qualitatively through legal certainty theories and relevant doctrines. Findings indicate three main issues. First, overlapping requirements between STPW and OSS create administrative duplication and potential dual-track enforcement, resulting in legal uncertainty. Second, conflicts arise between public law obligations and private contractual practices in foreign franchise agreements, particularly regarding exclusive supply clauses that contradict local content and MSME partnership requirements. Third, comparative analysis shows that Malaysia’s Franchise Act 1998, strengthened by the 2020 amendment, ensures stronger legal certainty through ex-ante registration, clear deadlines, and enforceable criminal sanctions, providing more credible deterrence than Indonesia’s framework. The study concludes that Indonesia’s franchise regulation remains fragmented and lacks binding statutory authority, which undermines investor confidence and domestic economic protection. It recommends the enactment of a comprehensive franchise law at the statutory level, full integration of STPW within the OSS system, and reinforced sanction mechanisms to enhance legal certainty and create a more conducive business climate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adelifka. (2024, June 10). Wajibkah membuat kontrak dalam dua bahasa jika melibatkan pihak asing. HukumOnline. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/wajibkah-membuat-kontrak-dalam-dua-bahasa-jika-melibatkan-pihak-asing--lt4dd480ffe6cb1/

Apandy, P. A. O., Melawati, & Adam, P. (2021). Pentingnya hukum perlindungan konsumen dalam jual beli. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 3(1).

Arif, M. E., Anggraeni, R., & Ayuni, R. F. (2021). Bisnis waralaba. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Bakhri, S. (2015). Masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN dan tinjauan dari perspektif ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi KIAT, 26(2), 32–37.

Baskaran, L., & Sean, C. T. (2021, April 22). The Franchise (Amendment) Act 2020. Skrine Advocates & Solicitors.

Cahyaningtyas, R. N. (2022). The effect of RBA OSS-based company licensing on domestic investment. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3), 23231–23242. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6338

Dhiba, H. F. (2019). Penerapan asas-asas hukum dalam pengambilan keputusan kebijakan bebas visa kunjungan (BVK) di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Keimigrasian, 2(1).

Ghani, M. F. A., Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Mat Isa, R., & Abd Hamid, H. (2022). A preliminary study: Exploring franchising growth factors of franchisor and franchisee. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030138

Ginting, R. G. (2021). Legal comparisons regarding the content of franchise prospectus in legal system of United States of America, Australia, Indonesia for legal protection of frait recipients in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2779–2790. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1987

Haisa, H., Insan, A. N., & Hamid, M. (2025). Implementation of online submission risk based approach (OSS-RBA) system for business actors in order to accelerate business licensing. Journal La Bisecoman, 5(3), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v5i3.2122

Hall, A. (2025, May). Vendor exclusivity requirements in franchise agreements. Aaron Hall Attorney. https://aaronhall.com/vendor-exclusivity-requirements-in-franchise-agreements/

Hanitijo, R. (1988). Metodologi penelitian hukum dan jurumenteri. Ghalia Indonesia.

Hosen, N., Kingsley, J. J., & Linsdey, T. (2021). Lost in translation: Indonesia language requirements and validity of contracts. University of Queensland Law Journal, 40(3), 531–553.

International Franchise Association. (2025). What is franchise. https://www.franchise.org/faqs/basics/what-is-a-franchise

Kerkovic, T. M. (2010). The main directions in comparative franchising regulation - Unidroit initiative and its influence. European Research Studies, 13(1).

Kharimah, M., & Isyuniandri, D. (2022). Edukasi kepengurusan perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko melalui sistem online single submission (OSS). Jurnal Abdimasi (Journal of Community Service): Sasambo, 4(4), 521–529.

Lanchimba, C., Porras, H., Salazar, Y., & Windsperger, J. (2024). Franchising and country development: Evidence from 49 countries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0779

Laraswati, L. D., Sutopo, W., & Yuniaristanto. (2015). Kajian exclusive dealing dan pengaruhnya terhadap tingkat persaingan usaha dan ilmu bisnis pada rantai pasok industri komponen. Jurnal Metris, 16, 15–20.

Marsha. (2025, June 12). English as prevailing language in an agreement: The Indonesia law perspective. Schinder Law Firm. https://schinderlawfirm.com/blog/english-as-prevailing-language-in-an-agreement-the-indonesian-law-perspective/

Medina, A. F. (2025, September 1). Agency, distribution, and franchising in Indonesia: What contract terms win. ASEAN Briefing. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/agency-distribution-and-franchising-in-indonesia-what-contract-terms-win/

Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-bab tentang penemuan hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Nicholas, F. (2023). Kekuatan eksistensi bisnis waralaba sebagai perjanjian innominaat di Indonesia. Law, Development, & Justice Review, 6(1), 82–93.

Niu, C. (2022). Franchising economic outlook 2022. International Franchise Association.

Novera, A., & Utama, M. (2014). Dasar-dasar hukum kontrak dan arbitrase (Irsan & D. Nopriansyah, Eds.). Tunggal Mandiri.

Nurhidayat, I. (2023). Prinsip-prinsip good governance di Indonesia. Journal E-Gov Wiyata: Education and Government, 1(1), 40–52.

Oktaviani, N. M. A. D. (2024). Waralaba sebagai peluang baru dalam dunia wirausaha. IAHN Gde Puja Mataram, 14–26.

Permatasari, E. (2021, April 12). Perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko, begini penjelasannya. HukumOnline. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perizinan-berusaha-berbasis-risiko-begini-penjelasannya-lt60741b4e30518/

Redjeki, S. (2011). Waralaba (franchise) di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 8(2).

Rokhman, B., Tobirin, Rokhman, A., & Kurniasih, D. (2024). Penyelenggaraan perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko melalui sistem online single submission (OSS). Journal of Social and Economics Research, 6(1), 1562–1580. https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v6i1.399

Samsudin, F., Wahab, S. A., Latiff, A. S. A., Osman, S. I. W., Zawawi, N. F. M., & Fazal, S. A. (2018). Strategic direction and sustainable development in franchising organizations: A conceptual study. Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n4p89

Sidharta. (2006). Karakteristik penalaran hukum dalam konteks keindonesiaan. CV. Utomo Bandung.

Soekanto, S. (2008). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.

Sugesty, M., Saptono, H., & Prananingtyas, P. (2016). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap pembatalan loan agreement pada PT Bangun Karya Pratama Lestari dan Nine AM Ltd. (Studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 451/Pdt.G/2012/PN.JKT.BAR). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3).

Sutrisno, G. B. (2025, February). Report: 90% of shoppers in Malaysia and Indonesia prioritise faith-aligned brands. Marketing-Interactive. https://www.marketing-interactive.com/report-90-of-shoppers-in-malaysia-indonesia-prioritise-faith-aligned-brands

Suyudi, A., & Budi, H. S. (2022). Reconsidering the mandatory use of Indonesian language in private commercial contract. Global Legal Review, 2(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v2i2.4997

Wicaksana, H. R., Putra, G. S., Ludianti, E., Ramadhan, M. F., & Rahasdi, D. V. F. (2022). Praktik hukum waralaba di Indonesia. Unisri Press.

Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Legal certainty for unregistered franchise agreements in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.1.7

Yasrebi-De Kom, F. M., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., Van Der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2022). The effect of sanction severity and its interaction with procedural justice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211038358

Published
2025-11-30
How to Cite
Nugraha, M. A. H., Fathni, I., Kurniawan, R., Damanik, H., & Irawan, A. (2025). LEGAL COMPLIANCE IN THE FOREIGN FRANCHISE SECTOR: EXAMINING THE ALIGNMENT BETWEEN FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS AND BUSINESS LICENSING IN INDONESIA. Awang Long Law Review, 8(1), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i1.1801