THE LEGAL POSITION OF CHURCH MARRIAGE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MARRIAGE LAW AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CHRISTIANS IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Marriage in the Christian tradition has undergone a historical development, from a simple community practice in the ancient Roman world, where a personal declaration of commitment between the prospective bride and groom was considered valid, to becoming a sacred and legal institution elevated as a sacrament of the church. The 11th-century Reformation of the Catholic Church and the 16th-century Council of Trent strengthened the sacramental status of marriage, requiring its publication and solemnization before the church community to avoid disputes and ensure legal and theological validity. In Indonesia, the practice of church marriage was influenced by the colonial legal system, which required civil registration in addition to a church blessing. Today, a church blessing is considered to fulfill the spiritual aspect, while registration at the Civil Registry Office is an absolute prerequisite for legal recognition and protection of the constitutional rights of Christian families.
This research uses a normative juridical method with a study of regulations, doctrines, and implementation practices. The research results show that there is a dualism of recognition—a valid church marriage may not be legally recognized by the state without civil registration, which has an impact on the legal status, inheritance, and administration of children. Analysis of church legal theory, formal state legality, constitutional rights, and legal certainty emphasizes the importance of harmonization between positive law and the sacred values of the church so that the rights of Christian families are comprehensively protected. The research recommendations emphasize the need for public education, church advocacy, and inclusive state services so that church marriages receive full spiritual and legal recognition in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Amiruddin & Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Anggita. (2024). Penyelesaian sengketa konflik kepemilikan tanah dengan pendekatan litigasi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Savana: Indonesian Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Law, 1(01), 24–38.
Asmar, A. (2021). Pertimbangan hakim Tata Usaha Negara dalam pembatalan sertipikat hak atas tanah yang dibebani hak tanggungan (Analisis Putusan No.43/G/2019/PTUN.PDG dan Putusan No.44/G/2019/PTUN.PLG). Jurnal Swara Justisia, 5(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v5i2
Bakri, M. (2011). Hak menguasai tanah oleh negara: Paradigma baru untuk reforma agraria. UB Press.
Digna, F. C. (2025). Penyelesaian sengketa sertipikat ganda melalui Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandar Lampung (Studi kasus putusan nomor: 22/G/2021/PTUN-BL) [Skripsi tidak diterbitkan]. Universitas Lampung.
Ferawati, S., & Kartabrata, F. R. (n.d.). Karakterisasi yurisprudensi No. 154 PK/TUN/2010: Kaidah hukum pembagian kompetensi absolut sengketa pertanahan. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. https://karakterisasi.komisiyudisial.go.id/
Fitriani, D. E. (2021). Pembatalan sertifikat hak atas tanah negara milik perusahaan umum Jasa Tirta 1 (Studi Putusan PTUN Surabaya No.83/G/2014) [Skripsi tidak diterbitkan]. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/35225/7/17230027.pdf
Hermawan, N. R., Shebubakar, A. N., & Sadino, S. (2024). Legal aspects of land acquisition for the National Capital City (IKN) of the Nusantara. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(5), 1636–1648. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.544
Kedudukan sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai alat bukti dalam penyelesaian permasalahan sengketa tanah berdasarkan perspektif hukum positif Indonesia. (2021). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 201–213. [tautan mencurigakan telah dihapus]
Koeswahyono, I. (2019). Tanah untuk keadilan sosial: Perbandingan penataan pertanahan di beberapa negara. Arena Hukum, 12(2), 232-252.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press.
Nasir, S. M. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap sertifikat hak atas tanah ganda (overlapping) di Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Gorontalo. Jurnal Eksekusi, 2(4), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1544
Pratiwi, H. E. (2020). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembatalan sertifikat hak atas tanah oleh Kantor Pertanahan. Savana: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 26–36. https://journal.fhukum.uniku.ac.id/savana/article/download/30/19/74
Pujiningrum, W. (n.d.). Peran yurisprudensi dalam perkara sengketa hak atas tanah [Makalah]. Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/artikel/Makalah%20peran%20yurisprudensi_wigati.pdf
Ramadhan, A. A. (2024). Sengketa kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara terkait dengan perkara sengketa pertanahan. Journal of Mandalika Literature, 6(1), 264–278. http://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jml/article/download/3993/3114/
Rusli, T., & Anjasmoro, D. (2022). Analisis hukum penyelesaian sengketa pembatalan sertifikat tanah melalui jalur litigasi PTUN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 22/G/2020/PTUN-BL). Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani), 12(2), 328–346.
Saputra, R. A., Silvana, S., & Marino, E. F. (2021). Penyelesaian sengketa sertifikat tanah ganda serta bentuk kepastian hukumnya. Jurnal Jentera, 4(2), 555–573. https://jurnal.jentera.ac.id/index.php/jentera/article/download/40/26/254
U.S. Embassy Jakarta. (2024). Marriage in Indonesia. https://id.usembassy.gov/marriage/.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yohanes Payong Keda, Abdul Rokhim, S Roy Hendrayanto, Imron

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




