POSITION OF LAND EXAMINATION BY JUDGES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS OVER LAND CERTIFICATE DISPUTES

  • Hasanul Raya Harahap University of August 17, 1945, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Isnawati University of August 17, 1945, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Fatimah Asyari University of August 17, 1945, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Dina Paramitha Hefni Putri University of August 17, 1945, Samarinda, Indonesia
Keywords: PTUN, Land Certificate Dispute, Legal Certainty

Abstract

Land certificate disputes are a frequent legal issue in Indonesia, in line with the increasing demand for land, its high economic value, and the position of certificates as legal evidence of ownership rights and the object of state administrative decisions. Various problems such as overlapping certificates, administrative errors, and overlapping authority between the State Administrative Court (PTUN) and the District Court, often give rise to legal uncertainty and have implications for social unrest in society. Therefore, this study focuses on a juridical-normative analysis of the role and authority of PTUN judges in examining and deciding cases related to land certificate disputes. The results show that PTUN judges play a strategic role as testers of the legality of land administration decisions, guarantors of legal certainty, and protectors of community rights through judicial oversight mechanisms. On-site inspections by judges are crucial as an effort to objectify field facts and enforce the principle of legality. This study emphasizes the need for regulatory synergy and increased integrity of the land bureaucracy so that legal protection and substantive justice for land rights are truly realized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiruddin & Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Anggita. (2024). Penyelesaian sengketa konflik kepemilikan tanah dengan pendekatan litigasi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Savana: Indonesian Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Law, 1(01), 24–38.

Asmar, A. (2021). Pertimbangan hakim Tata Usaha Negara dalam pembatalan sertipikat hak atas tanah yang dibebani hak tanggungan (Analisis Putusan No.43/G/2019/PTUN.PDG dan Putusan No.44/G/2019/PTUN.PLG). Jurnal Swara Justisia, 5(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v5i2

Digna, F. C. (2025). Penyelesaian sengketa sertipikat ganda melalui Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandar Lampung (Studi kasus putusan nomor: 22/G/2021/PTUN-BL) [Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan]. Universitas Lampung.

Ferawati, S., & Kartabrata, F. R. (t.t.). Karakterisasi yurisprudensi No. 154 PK/TUN/2010: Kaidah hukum pembagian kompetensi absolut sengketa pertanahan. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. Diperoleh dari https://karakterisasi.komisiyudisial.go.id/

Fitriani, D. E. (2021). Pembatalan sertifikat hak atas tanah negara milik perusahaan umum Jasa Tirta 1 (Studi Putusan PTUN Surabaya No.83/G/2014) [Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan]. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Kedudukan sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai alat bukti dalam penyelesaian permasalahan sengketa tanah berdasarkan perspektif hukum positif Indonesia. (2021). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 201–213. Diperoleh dari [tautan mencurigakan telah dihapus]

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press.

Nasir, S. M. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap sertifikat hak atas tanah ganda (overlapping) di Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Gorontalo. Jurnal Eksekusi, 2(4), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1544

Pratiwi, H. E. (2020). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembatalan sertifikat hak atas tanah oleh Kantor Pertanahan. Savana: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 26–36. https://journal.fhukum.uniku.ac.id/savana/article/download/30/19/74

Pujiningrum, W. (t.t.). Peran yurisprudensi dalam perkara sengketa hak atas tanah [Makalah]. Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Diperoleh dari https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/artikel/Makalah%20peran%20yurisprudensi_wigati.pdf

Ramadhan, A. A. (2024). Sengketa kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara terkait dengan perkara sengketa pertanahan. Journal of Mandalika Literature, 6(1), 264–278. http://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jml/article/download/3993/3114/

Rusli, T., & Anjasmoro, D. (2022). Analisis hukum penyelesaian sengketa pembatalan sertifikat tanah melalui jalur litigasi PTUN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 22/G/2020/PTUN-BL). Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani), 12(2), 328–346.

Saputra, R. A., Silvana, S., & Marino, E. F. (2021). Penyelesaian sengketa sertifikat tanah ganda serta bentuk kepastian hukumnya. Jurnal Jentera, 4(2), 555–573. https://jurnal.jentera.ac.id/index.php/jentera/article/download/40/26/254

Published
2025-11-29
How to Cite
Harahap, H. R., Isnawati, Asyari, F., & Putri, D. P. H. (2025). POSITION OF LAND EXAMINATION BY JUDGES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS OVER LAND CERTIFICATE DISPUTES. Awang Long Law Review, 8(1), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i1.1867