BREACH OF CONTRACT IN COMMERCIAL GUARANTEE RELATIONSHIPS: AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRICT COURT DECISION NO. 127/PDT.G/2022/PN JKT.PST

Angeline Wellvy Santoso; Mia Hadiati

doi:10.56301/awl.v8i1.1908

Angeline Wellvy Santoso Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Mia Hadiati Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i1.1908

Keywords: Breach of Contract, Commercial Guarantee, Justice Principle

Abstract

This research examines the legal construction of default in commercial guarantee relationships, focusing on the analysis of District Court Decision No. 127/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst. The background arises from the growing complexity of modern business contracts that position guarantors as equivalent to primary debtors, thereby shifting the legal function of guarantees. This research seeks to examine the legal aspects basis of guarantor liability in cases of debtor default and to assess the judicial interpretation trends regarding contractual obligations. The research applies a normative-juridical approach by reviewing primary legal materials, including primary sources like statutes and judicial rulings, along with secondary materials such as legal literature and journals scholarly. The findings indicate that the court adopted a progressive interpretation of the pacta sunt servanda and good faith principles as the basis for imposing liability on guarantors. The decision reflects a paradigm shift from a formalistic to a contextual and proportional approach that prioritizes substantive justice over mere textual certainty. The study concludes that the standardization of commercial guarantee contracts and consistent jurisprudence are essential to ensure balance between creditor protection and guarantor fairness in commercial transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mia Hadiati, Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Law

References

Adichandra, M. B., & Setianingrum, R. B. (2022). Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Rumah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Pengembang. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i1.13222

Amalia, N. (2012). Hukum Perikatan. Unimal Press.

Ashibly. (2018). Buku Ajar Hukum Jaminan. Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin Press.

Dian Pribadi Sihotang. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Debitor Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren Setelah Homologasi Perjanjian Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.47

Djatmiko, A. A., Setyaningrum, F., & Zainudin, R. (2022). Implementasi Bentuk Ganti Rugi Menurut Burgelijk Wetboek (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata) Indonesia. Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v1i7.350

Fuady, M. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Erlangga.

Hermansyah, H. N. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Eksistensi Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Perjanjian Dewasa ini (Standar Kontrak) di Masyarakat. Jurnal Wasaka Hukum, 8(1), 155–182.

Hernoko, A. Y. (2019). Prinsip Proporsionalitas sebagai Dasar Keseimbangan Hak dan Kewajiban dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 8(3), 397.

Hidayat, D. R. (2018). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DENGAN JAMINAN ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG SAMA. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(27), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.1590

Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Januar, I., Radisman Saragih, & Anthon Nainggolan. (2022). Kewajiban Debitur Mengembalikan Prestasi dari Pinjaman Online yang Ilegal. Honeste Vivere, 32(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v32i2.142

Jenie, S. I., Yuniarlin, P., & Musjtari, D. N. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. LP3M UMY.

Kharisma, A. P. (2023). KEDUDUKAN HUKUM KREDITOR SEPARATIS ATAS JAMINAN KEBENDAAN MILIK GUARANTOR YANG TELAH PAILIT DALAM KEPAILITAN DEBITOR PAILIT. Perspektif, 28(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i2.850

Kiemas, A., Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Redefining Bankruptcy Law: Incorporating the Principle of Business Continuity for Fair Debt Resolution. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.996

Maulana, R., Ramziati, & Bahreisy, B. (2022). Analisis Tindakan Wanprestasi Terhadap Perjanjian Pemberian Kredit Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Persero Tbk. (Studi Putusan Nomor 11/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Bir). Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, 1(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.32734/nlr.v1i1.9613

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Harper & Row.

Priyono, E. A. (2015). Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Franchise Es Teler 77 (Suatu Pendekatan Normatif). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.2.2015.123-129

Purwahid, P., & Kashadi. (2006). Hukum Jaminan Edisi Revisi Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Putri, G., Fionita, J., & Matheus, J. (2024). Lelang Eksekusi Kepailitan atas Tanah dan Bangunan yang Dimiliki Bersama oleh Pihak Ketiga dan Debitur Pailit. Jurnal Supremasi, 14(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.3810

Putri, O. G., & Silviana, A. (2023). Kepastian Hukum terhadap Objek Jual Beli Tanah yang Dimasukkan dalam Harta Boedel Pailit oleh Kurator. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 23(2), 1590–1594. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v23i2.3227

Rezeki, S. S. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Penerapan Prinsip Strict Liability Dalam Kasus Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 1(1), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2015.1.1.224-235

Samudra, D., & Hibar, U. (2021). STUDI KOMPARASI SAHNYA PERJANJIAN ANTARA PASAL 1320 K.U.H.PERDATA DENGAN PASAL 52 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v1i1.9

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (16th ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Srikandi, P. ayu, Nilfatri, Kadarsih, S., Marwendi, R. O., & Pitri, A. (2025). An Islamic Legal Review of the Joint Liability System Practice in PNM Mekar Financing. Zabags International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 218–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61233/zijis.v2i2.20

Sriwidodo, J., & Kristiawanto. (2021). Memahami Hukum Perikatan. Kepel Press.

Subagyo, H., & I Made Kanthika. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KREDITOR SEPARATIS TERHADAP JAMINAN KEBENDAAN PIHAK KETIGA DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN (STUDI KASUS PERKARA KEPAILITAN NOMOR : 21/PDT.SUS.GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2019/PN.NIAGA SBY., JUNCTO PERKARA NOMOR : 18/PDT.SUS/PKPU/2018/PN.SBY. JOURNAL EQUITABLE, 8(2), 208–233. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v8i2.4953

Subekti. (2005). Hukum Perjanjian (1st ed.). Intermasa.

Swandewi, P. L. J., Budiartha, I. N., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2022). Efektivitas Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik pada Transaksi Jual Beli Hasil Bumi di Desa Sidetapa Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.1.4627.73-77

Syamsiah, D., Bao, R. M. B., & Yuliana, N. F. (2023). DASAR PENERAPAN ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PERJANJIAN. JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN, 9(2), 841–848. https://doi.org/10.32520/das-sollen.v9i2.2988

Usman, R. (2008). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Sinar Grafika.

Usman, R. (2018). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. PT Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

William, G. V. (2019). Akta Borgtocht Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Media Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(1), 50–61.