LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CONSUMERS IN E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS (COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA & THAILAND)

  • Indri Yani Dewi Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Padian Adi Salamat Siregar Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Consumer Protection, E-commerce, Comparative Law, Indonesia, Thailand

Abstract

The development of e-commerce in Indonesia and Thailand presents new challenges in consumer protection that require in-depth comparative studies. Consumers are in a relatively weak position due to limited access to inspecting goods directly, information asymmetry, and the potential risk of fraud and non-conformity of goods. This study analyzes two main research questions: first, how e-commerce transactions are regulated in Indonesia and Thailand; and second, how legal protection for consumers in e-commerce transactions compares in both countries. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with a statute approach and a comparative approach, with a descriptive analytical nature. Data are sourced from primary legal materials in the form of Indonesian and Thai laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of journals and scientific books, which are analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show fundamental differences between the two countries. Indonesia has a fragmented regulatory system in various regulations, including Law No. 8 of 1999, the ITE Law, and Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019, which creates overlapping authority, applies a limited reverse burden of proof principle that still burdens consumers, and has a dispute resolution system through the BPSK (Regional Consumer Protection Agency) that is time-consuming and has a low level of compliance. In contrast, Thailand implements integrated regulations with the Consumer Protection Act as umbrella legislation, a strict liability principle that benefits consumers by only proving product defects, losses, and causal relationships, and an efficient dispute resolution system through the OCPB and Online Dispute Resolution with a high level of compliance. The existence of the OCPB as a specialized institution with administrative, mediation, and supervisory authority is a strength of the Thai system. The study recommends that Indonesia adopt an integrated approach, strengthen institutions, and develop a technology-based system to improve the effectiveness of e-commerce consumer protection within the context of ASEAN harmonization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adenia, RF (2020). Legal aspects for e-commerce business actors who do not have a SIUP

based on positive Indonesian law.

Andryan Aprynaldi, DR (2024). LEX OMNIBUS: Journal of Constitutional Law and State Administration: A Legal Review of Business Registration Obligations for E-Commerce Business Actors According to the Lex Omnibus Law: Journal of Constitutional Law and State Administration. 1, 42–52.

Benuf, K., Azhar, M., Badan, S., Hukum, K., Hukum, F., Diponegoro, U., Hukum, P., & Contemporary, M. (2020). Legal Research Methodology as an Instrument for Analyzing Contemporary Legal Problems. Echoes of Justice Journal Echoes of Justice Journal. 7, 20–33.

Fauzah Nur Aksa, Siska Mona Widia, SH (2025). Comparison of Research Methods Normative Jurisprudence and Empirical Jurisprudence: Research at UIN Sjech M Djamil Djambek 1. 12(6), 2226–2236.

Irlan Anugrah, IS (2022). Legal protection for consumers and business actors in online buying and selling transactions. 6(2), 2613–2623.

Kungsung, T. (2025). Consumer Protection for Online Shopping: Cases of Consumers Being Damaged by Unsafe Products in Thailand Academic article. 11(2).

Kusumadewi, Y., & Sharon, G. (2022). Consumer protection law (pp. 49– 60). Institution Fatimah Azzahrah.

Lanja, S. (2019). Legal protection for consumers in online transactions (Comparative study) Law Number 08 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection in Indonesia and Law Number 02 of 1998 concerning Consumer Protection in Thailand)(pp. 5–8; 12–15). IAIN Jember.

Nasution, EY (2020). The Development of E-Commerce Business Transactions on Growth Economy in Indonesia. 3(2), 506–519.

Qustulani, M. (2018). Legal & Consumer Protection (pp. 35–39). PSP Nusantara Press.

Salamat, PA (2022, June). Consumer Protection Against the Implementation of Standard Clauses In Credit Agreements at Pawnshops. In National Seminar on Law, Social and Economics (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 475-485).

Suttawa, E. (2020). Practical Problems In The Implementation Of Sections 308 And 309 Of The Thai Civil Procedure Code.

Poom Moolsilpa, Pornpen Traiphong, PJ (2022). THE IMPACT OF ENFORCEMENT OFTHE PERSONAL DATA. June.

Puteri Asyifa Octavia Apandy, Melawati, PA (2021). Business: Complete with Studies Law. 3(1).

Rattanakul, P. (2023). The Personal Data Protection Act B . E. 2562 ( 2019 ) for Humans Resources Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of Mahidol University.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen,

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (KUH PERDATA)

Undang-Undang Thailand (Product Liability Act B.E. 2551 (2008)

Published
2026-01-23
How to Cite
Dewi, I. Y., & Padian Adi Salamat Siregar. (2026). LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CONSUMERS IN E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS (COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA & THAILAND). Awang Long Law Review, 8(2), 639-645. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i2.2047