ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT

Ori Va Malquna; Alfies Sihombing; Yeni Nuraeni

doi:10.56301/awl.v8i3.2048

Ori Va Malquna Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Pakuan, Kota Bogor, Indonesia
Alfies Sihombing Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Pakuan, Kota Bogor, Indonesia
Yeni Nuraeni Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Pakuan, Kota Bogor, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i3.2048

Keywords: ETLE (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement), law enforcement ETLE, ETLE regulation

Abstract

This research is a normative legal study that analyzes the effectiveness of implementing the Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) system in combating traffic and road transport violations (LLAJ) in Indonesia based on Law Number 22 of 2009 and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2012. The study's focus is directed toward the suitability of implementing ETLE with Article 272 of the Road Traffic and Transportation Act (UU LLAJ), which legitimizes the use of electronic equipment as an aid in enforcing traffic laws. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach. The research results indicate that the ETLE system is partially effective in improving public compliance with traffic regulations and reducing extortion practices thru technology-based enforcement and electronic evidence. However, the effectiveness of ETLE implementation still faces several obstacles, including limited supporting infrastructure, suboptimal integration of vehicle ownership data, and low public understanding of ETLE procedures. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen technical regulations, improve infrastructure quality, and optimize public socialization to support the sustainable effectiveness of technology-based traffic law enforcement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggia, M. F. (2022). Compliance and awareness as mediation variables on the influence of utility and trust of electronic traffic law enforcement on traffic habit. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 421–431. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.38

Army, H. E. (2020). Bukti elektronik dalam praktik peradilan. Sinar Grafika.

Hadirman, H. (2004). Menuju tertib lalu lintas. Gandesa Puramas.

Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.

Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 80 Tahun 2012 tentang Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Kendaraan Bermotor di Jalan dan Penindakan Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.

Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Irsan, Y. M. (2018). Perspektif penerapan ETLE dengan menggunakan rekaman CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) (Skripsi). Universitas Lampung.

Leonita, A. N., Islah, I., & Hisbah, H. (2022). Penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran lalu lintas di Kota Jambi melalui tilang elektronik atau electronic traffic law enforcement (ETLE). Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(3), 1742–1750. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2823

Manso, K., Lengkong, F., & Londa, V. (2022). Implementasi program elektronik tilang (ETLE) pada Direktorat Lalu Lintas (Ditlantas) Polda Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 88–97.

Marwan, A. (2010). Teori hukum kontemporer: Suatu pengantar postmodernisme hukum. Rangkang Education.

Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.

Pangestuti, E. (2021). Prosedur penyelesaian hukum terhadap pelanggaran lalu lintas dalam KUHP. Yustitiabelen, 7(1), 72–93.

Purbacaraka, P., & Soekanto, S. (1978). Perihal kaidah hukum. Alumni.

Rahardian, I. B., & Dian, A. K. (2011). Program aplikasi berbasis web untuk peningkatan akuntabilitas sistem tilang pelanggaran tata tertib lalu lintas di wilayah Polres Majalengka. Jurnal Online ICT-STMIK IKMI, 1(1), 43–50.

Rahmat, A. F. (2021). Delivering artificial intelligence for electronic traffic law enforcement in Yogyakarta region: Current effort and future challenges. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 717(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/717/1/012016

Singgamata. (2023). Penegakan hukum lalu lintas melalui ETLE dalam meningkatkan kesadaran hukum berlalu lintas. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 11(1), 1–15.

Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sunarso, S. (2005). Penegakan hukum dalam kajian sosiologis. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Surjono, H. D. (1996). Pengembangan pendidikan teknologi informasi di era global. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Ubaidillah, A. W. A., & Suryokencono, P. (2024). Sinkronisasi hukum pengaturan electronic traffic law enforcement (ETLE) menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 1–12.

Wulandari, E. I. (2020). Optimalisasi aplikasi ETLE dalam penindakan pelanggaran lalu lintas di Polres Banyumas. Advances in Police Science Research Journal, 4(1), 281–328.