THE RELEVANCE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH TO THE LEGAL CERTAINTY OF MARRIAGE AGREEMENTS

Sabrina Fiddini Achmad; Mutiara Eldiena Fitri; Ida Ayu Intan Budha Ranny; Shafiyah Nur Azizah

doi:10.56301/awl.v8i3.2060

Sabrina Fiddini Achmad Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6884-5589
Mutiara Eldiena Fitri Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7374-1063
Ida Ayu Intan Budha Ranny Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4791-7412
Shafiyah Nur Azizah Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0584-0389

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i3.2060

Keywords: Principle of good faith, Marriage Agreement, Legal Certainty

Abstract

This research was conducted to examine and analyze the importance of applying the principle of good faith in prenuptial agreements. This need arose due to existing weaknesses, whereby the parties to the agreement could act in bad faith, thereby misusing the agreement as a tool to protect their personal interests, which in turn could potentially harm third parties. In an effort to ensure legal certainty and examine the binding force of prenuptial agreements, the application of the principle of good faith is fundamental when drafting agreements. The application of this principle is expected to prevent future losses when prenuptial agreements are legalized and enforced. This study uses a legal research method with a theoretical research type and analyzes legal materials through a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and case studies. The findings of this study indicate that the application of the principle of good faith in prenuptial agreements plays an important role as a preventive measure against the misuse of the objectives and goals of the agreement. The application of this principle aims not only to ensure legal certainty and protection for both parties, but also for third parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhi Utomo, M., & Herning Sitabuana, T. (2023). Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Pada Asas Itikad Baik dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama Bagi Hasil. Jurnal Supremasi, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.2211

Akbar, N. A. (2025, October 21). Berapa Triliun Korupsi Harvey Moeis Hingga Berujung Disitanya Aset Sandra Dewi?. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/10/21/11345641/berapa-triliun-korupsi-harvey-moeis-hingga-berujung-disitanya-aset-sandra?page=all#page2

Atmoko, D., & Noviriska, N. (2024). Kepastian Hukum dalam Transaksi Online: Peran Asas Itikad Baik Berdasarkan Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.955

Bachsin, A., Aidil Falaq Adiyaksa, Hafiz Fathi Huga Ekoputro, Reky, Saputra, P., & Nandang Kusnadi. (2025). Peran Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Kontrak di Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2531–2539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1665

Christy, M. A. (2022). Penyimpangan Asas Itikad Baik dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Kendaraan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(1), 41–53.

Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Constitutional Court, October 27, 2016.

Dwiputra, A. E. A. (2022). Perjanjian Kawin Pasca Berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/Puu-Xiii/2015. Jurnal Education and Development, 11(1), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i1.4251

Fajriah, F., Ama, S. F., Noviyanti, S., & Chan, F. (2024). Peran Manusia sebagai Makhluk Individu dan Makhluk Sosial. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 2250–2259. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/10753/7419

Farhan, I. A., & Moh. Safil Kafi. (2023). PERANAN PELAKSANAAN ASAS IKTIKAD BAIK DALAM HUKUM. 1(2), 532–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i2.391

Garner, B. A. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Edition). West Publishing Co.

Hamiidah, E., & Silviana, A. (2024). Upaya Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Perkawinan Studi Kasus. NOTARIUS, 17, 391–400.

Handayani, M. (2024). Kedudukan Perjanjian Kawin Yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan Terhadap Pihak Ketiga. Journal Evidence of Law, 3(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i1.630

Henokh Alexandro Pohan, R., Pujiwati, Y., & Agus Saleh, K. (2023). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 746/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Sby Tentang Pelanggaran Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah di Kota Surabaya Dikaitkan Dengan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(09), 1661–1676. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v2i09.564

I Gusti Ngurah Muliarta. (2022). The Principle of Good Faith in the Sale and Purchase Agreement of Rights Made Before a Notary. Community Service Journal of Law, 1(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.55637/csjl.1.1.4477.44-48

Law Number 1 of 1974 Jo Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage, Number 1, State Gazette. 1974/ Number. 1, Supplement to the State Gazette Number. 3019, Loose-leaf of the State Secretariat: 26 pages.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (13th Edition). Kencana.

Mezak, M. H. (2006). Jenis, Metode dan Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum. Law Review, 5(3), 85–97.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (1st Edition). Mataram University Press.

Nadia Putri, R., Dewi Judiasih, S., & Anisa Lubis, N. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Dan Upaya Notaris Membuat Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Perkawinan. Veritas et Justitia, 5(2), 464–491. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3353

Octavia, S., & Rusiana, D. angga. (2025). Aset Sandra Dewi yang Disita Belum Mampu Tutupi Uang Pengganti Harvey Moeis Rp 420 M. Nasional.Kompas.

Pratitis, S. A. (2023). Keabsahan Perjanjian Pra Nikah dan Akibat Hukumnya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1593

Prihandini, Y. D. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Atas Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol4.iss2.art9

Puspadini, M. (2024, August 14). Tak Ajukan Eksepsi, Sidang Pembuktian Harvey Moeis Lanjut Kamis Depan. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20240814132432-17-562984/tak-ajukan-eksepsi-sidang-pembuktian-harvey-moeis-lanjut-kamis-depan

Rifai’i, I. J., Purwoto, A., & dkk. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum.

Siswanti, E. S. (2021). PERJANJIAN PRA NIKAH DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM. 7(2).

Sulistiyawati, & Hariyanto, E. (2021). Peran Itikad Baik Mediasi Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Konflik Keluarga. Mahkamah : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 6(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.24235/mahkamah.v6i1.7577

Susanti, S. O., & Efendi, A. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (legal Research). Sinar Grafika.

Usanti, T. P., & Anand, G. (2019). Hukum keluarga dan harta benda perkawinan. In CV. REVKA PRIMA MEDIA (p. 68)

Willa, W. (2023). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Pra Nikah. Hukum Online. Retrieved December 17, 2025, from Wahyuni Willa, “Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Pra Nikah”, Hukum Online, January 5 2023, accessed at December 17 2025, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/akibat-hukum-pembatalan-perjanjian-pra-nikah-lt63b6b2d963726/?page=1.