ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE POLICE CODE OF ETHICS SANCTIONS FOLLOWING THE ISSUANCE OF POLICE REGULATION NO. 7 OF 2022

Avy Sena Putra Manggala; Sukmareni

doi:10.56301/awl.v8i3.2065

Avy Sena Putra Manggala Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat, Padang, Indonesia
Sukmareni Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat, Padang, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i3.2065

Keywords: police, sanctions, code of ethics

Abstract

Sanctions for police officers who violate the KEPP were previously regulated in Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 14 of 2011 concerning the Code of Ethics for the Indonesian National Police. However, this regulation has been revoked and replaced with Perpol Number 7 of 2022. Based on the considerations in letter c of Perpol No. 7 of 2022, the reason for revoking and replacing the previous provisions was that they were no longer in line with developments in ethical values, culture, and behavior in society that influence the behavior of Indonesian National Police officials. The data analysis used is normative juridical. The research approach used by the author is the legal approach. Changes in the police code of ethics sanctions after the issuance of Perpol No. 7 of 2022 include a clearer and more detailed separation between ethical sanctions and administrative sanctions, changes in nomenclature, the categorization of sanctions, and an increase in the number of sanctions. Analysis of changes in the police code of ethics sanctions after the issuance of Perpol No. 7 of 2022. The separation between ethical sanctions and administrative sanctions, coupled with changes in nomenclature that are easy to understand, clear, and even accessible to all citizens, is in line with legal certainty, which contains values that are very important in the context of law and justice. The principle of proportionality prevents penalties that are too severe or too lenient, which are not in line with the characteristics of police officers who violate the KEPP. The current sanctions are in line with the principle of balance, which, in theory, emphasizes the possibility of self-improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, S., Subaidi, J., & Thani, S. (2025). Analisis Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Dalam Penerimaan Uang Suap. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v8i2.21424

Gaussyah, M. (2014). Peranan dan Kedudukan POLRI dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.

Hambali, M. R., Da‟I, M., Ilmiyah, N., Kurniawati, N., Cahyaningrum, V. D., Fatoni, M., Kartini, A. Y., Lestari, I. W., & Rohmah, R. (2021). Etika Profesi. Agrapana Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=OV8XEAAAQBAJ

Marsudianto. (2015). Komisi Kode Etik Polri Sebagai Lembaga Ad Hoc Kepolisian Dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Profesi Polri. Jurnal Aplikasi Administrasi, 18(2), 99–114. https://jaa.hangtuah.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/37/29

Maulana, I., Umamuddin, M., Aulia, A. T., & Nurmayani, I. D. (2025). Meruntuhkan Kepercayaan Publik: Dampak Pelanggaran Kode Etik oleh Aparat Kepolisian dalam Kasus Ferdy Sambo. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2551–2557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1662

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Neltje, J., & Panjiyoga, I. (2023). Nilai-Nilai Yang Tercakup Di Dalam Asas Kepastian Hukum. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 2034–2039. http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/5009

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Pub. L. No. 14 (2011).

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Kode Etik Profesi Dan Komisi Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Pub. L. No. 7 (2022).

Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 1 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pemberhentian Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Pub. L. No. 1 (2003).

Pramudy, D. W., & Yusuf, H. (2025). Analisis Normatif Penjatuhan Sanksi Etik dan Pidana pada Anggota Polri: Studi Kasus Ferdi Sambo. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(2). https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/1445

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan hukum: suatu tinjauan sosiologis. Genta Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DmoaQwAACAAJ

Setiawan, D., Juna, A. M., Fadillah, M. S., Oktarianda, S., Zulkarnen, Z., Rizal, A., & Satrio, I. (2024). Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana di Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.144

Solikin, N. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Penerbit Qiara Media.

Sulastri. (2022). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Denda Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Keadaan Tertentu Sebagai Nilai Keseimbangan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Wasaka Hukum, 10(1), 17–32. https://www.ojs.stihsa-bjm.ac.id/index.php/wasaka/article/view/61

Susanto, R. Y. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi Polri Berdasarkan Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Kode Etik Profesi Dan Komisi Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Jendela Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 68–78.

Suyono, Y. U. (2014). Hukum Kepolisian: kedudukan POLRI dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia setelah perubahan UUD 1945. Laksbang Grafika.

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Pub. L. No. 2 (2002).

Yudinata, R., Nurwandri, A., Nuraini, S., Romadhona, I., & Astuti, Z. (2024). Fungsi Kode Etik Polisi dalam Mencegah Pelanggaran yang dilakukan Aparat Penegak Hukum. MIZANUNA: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2(1), 32–44.