• Rizka Ayu Dwitami Hidayat Master of Notarial Affairs Study Program, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
  • Siti Malikhatun Badriyah Master of Notarial Affairs Study Program, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
Keywords: Notary, Shame, Authentic deed


The Notary Office Law does not explain the sanctions for Notaries clearly and in detail, only explaining on the Administrative and Civil Side, while Notaries cannot be said that Notaries are free from Criminal Sanctions, while the Notary's Office does not explain the Notary Criminal Sanctions section. Notaries can make mistakes such as committing intentional or unintentional forgery of deeds and these actions violate the Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) and the Notary Code of Ethics. From this case, administrative sanctions or code of professional ethics for the position of notary are imposed and civil sanctions can then become and be qualified as a criminal act committed by a Notary. The method is a descriptive analysis and use data analyzed qualitatively. This result is an explanation of how the application of criminal sanctions to Notaries who commit criminal acts of forgery of authentic deeds and the legal consequences of forgery of authentic deeds carried out by Notaries. As a result of the notary law, which is subject to criminal sanctions in the criminal act of forgery of authentic deeds along with deeds that are used as objects of the case in court for criminal cases, the notary defendant is sentenced to imprisonment and all deeds issued by the defendant's Notary are null and void.


Download data is not yet available.


Adjie, H. (2008). Indonesian Notary Law. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ali, A. (2002). Unveiling the Law (A Philosophical and Sociological Study). Jakarta: Gunung Agung Store.

Anggraeny, I., & Tongat. (2016). Notary Liability for Involvement in Document Forgery Crime. Varia Justisica, 6(1).

Anwar, M. (2000). Criminal Law Special Section. Bandung: Alumni.

Bashori, M. S. (2016). Criminal liability for notaries who commit the crime of forgery of letters in making authentic deeds. Journal of Supremacy, 6(2).

Central Board of the Indonesian Notary Association. (2008). The Identity of Indonesian Notaries Past, Present and Future. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Main Library.

Criminal Code

Djojodirjo, M. . M. (2006). Unlawful Conduct. Jakarta: Pratnya Paramita.

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Theory and Methodology of Normative Legal Research. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Kelsen, H. (2006). Legal Theory. Bandung: Nuansa &; Nusa Media.

Kelsen, H. (2007). General Theory Of law and State, General Theory Of Law And State, Fundamentals Of Normative Law As Empirical Descriptive Legal Science. Jakarta: BEE Media Indonesia.

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position

Mansyur, A. A. S. (2013). Normative juridical analysis of the forgery of authentic deeds carried out by a notary. Student Journal of Faculty of Law Univ Brawijaya Malang, 2–30.

Muhammad, F. N., Widowaty, Y., & Raharjo, T. (2019). Application of criminal sanctions against forgery of authentic deeds committed by notaries. Media of Law and Sharia, 1(1), 1–13.

Muljadi, K., &; Widjaja, G. (2010). The Alliance Born of the Covenant. Jakarta: King Grafindo Persada.

Nature, W. T. (2001). Law Talks Cases in Daily Life Popular Millennia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Rato, D. (2010). Philosophy of Law Seeking: Understanding and Understanding Law. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.

Schafmeister, D., Kijzer, N., &; Sitorus, E. P. (2005). Criminal Law. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Soemanto, W. (2009). Guidelines for Thesis Writing Techniques. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Soerjono, S. (1998). Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI Press.

Suteki, &; Taufani, G. (2020). Legal Research Methodology (Philosophy, Theory and Practice). Jakarta: King Grafindo Persada.

How to Cite
Hidayat, R. A. D., & Siti Malikhatun Badriyah. (2023). NORMATIVE JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF FORGERY OF AUTHENTIC DEEDS CARRIED OUT BY NOTARIES. Awang Long Law Review, 5(2), 624-630.