SUBSTANTIVE V EXCEPTION PROVISION DALAM GATT: STUDI KASUS INDONESIA DI WTO
Abstract
This research delves into the dynamic interplay between substantive provisions and exception clauses within the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Focusing on the case of Indonesia in the World Trade Organization (WTO), the study employs a comprehensive methodology involving legal analysis and a case study approach. Through this investigation, the research aims to unravel the intricate implications of substantive versus exception provisions in the context of international trade agreements.
Downloads
References
Bella Oktaviani, “Kasus DS-477 Dan DS-478 Indonesia-New Zealand-America Importation Of Horticultural Products, Animals And Animal Product Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip Penghapusan Hambatan Kuantitatifâ€, Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Volume 1 Nomor 3, (2021)
Brandon L. Bowen, “The World Trade Organization and Its Interpretation of the Article XX Exceptions to the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade, of Recent Developemnts†Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 29 No. 1 (2000) hal. 182-201.
Brazil v. Indonesia, Measures Concerning the Importation of Chicken Meat and Chicken Product, DS484, Dispute Settlement Body World Trade Organization
Dunoff, Jeffrey & Mark A. Pollack eds., International Law and International Relations: Taking Stock, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012
Fadhil Arkaan Katili, Karen Yohana, Natalia Yeti Puspita, “World Trade Organization: Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Impor Ayam (Brazil v. Indonesia), Majalah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma, Volume 23 Isue 2, (2021
Friedman, Thomas L., The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization 2nd Edition New York: First Anchor Books, 2000.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (diadopsi 1 April 1995, mulai berlaku 1 April 1995)
Haniff Ahamat dan Nasarudin Abdul Rahman, “Halal Food, Market Access and Exception to WTO Law: New Aspects Learned from Indonesia – Chicken Productsâ€, AJWH, Volume 13 Nomor 355 (2018).
Indira Carr, Jahid Bhuiyan et al eds., International Trade Law and WTO, Federation Press, 2012
Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, 2015 Report on Compliance by Major Trading Partners with Trade Agreements – WTO, FTA/EPA, and IIA
John King Gamble Jr. dan Joy Bilharz Kolb, “Multilateral Treaties: An Assessment of the Concept of Lateralityâ€, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3 No. 1, (1980) hal. 19-41.
Kadek Sarna, Nurhasan Ismail dan Harry Supriyono, “After Trade Dispute: is Indonesian Food Sovereignty Threatened?â€, Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, Volume 4 Nomor 2, (2020).
Krzystof J. Pelc, Making and Bending International Rules, The Design of Exceptions and Escape Clauses in Trade Law, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2016
Moran, Niall The First Twenty Cases under GATT Article XX; Tuna or Shrimp dear?, diakses dari https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/28278/1/Moran_SIEL_Paper30.3.pdf
Muhammad Maulana Iberahim, Indonesia’s Two Level Game at the WTO: a Political Economy Approach to the International Poultry Trade, Thesis Thammasat University, (2020)
New Zealand v. Indonesia, Measures Concerning the Importation of Horticultural Products, Animals and Animal Products, DS477, Dispute Settlement Body World Trade Organization
Rangel, Daniel, WTO General Exceptions: Trade Law’s Faulty Ivory Tower, Public Citizen: Washington DC, 2022
Rifkah Mufida, “Penerapan Prinsip National Treatment dalam Kasus Sengketa Impor Daging Ayam antara Brasil dan Indonesiaâ€, Justitia Et Pax Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 38 No. 1, (2022) hal. 141 – 172.
Rigod, Boris dan Tovar, Patricia, “Indonesia – Chicken: Tensions between international trade and domestic food policies?â€, EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 58 (2018)
Sihnomo Abu Hilmy, “Legal Consequences Dispute Settlement Body Decision 477-478 Concerning Protection and Empowerment of the Farmersâ€, Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, Volume 3 Nomor 1 (2020).
Suardi, “Pengaturan World Trade Organization dalam Hukum Internasional Serta Konflik Kepentingan antara Negara Maju dan Negara Berkembangâ€, Inspirasi, No. XIII (2012) hal. 1-20.
United States v. Indonesia, Measures Concerning the Importation of Horticultural Products, Animals and Animal Products, DS478, Dispute Settlement Body World Trade Organization
Venzke, Ingo “Making General Exceptions: The Spell of Precedents in Developing Article XX GATT into Standards for Domestic Regulatory Policyâ€, German Law Journal, Volume 12 Nomor 5 (2011)
World Trade Organization, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (The WTO Agreement Series), Jenewa: WTO Publications, 1998.
Yokhebed Arumdika Probosambodo, “The Exception of National Treatment Principle of GATT in Indonesiaâ€, Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018) hal. 245-256.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jessica Priscilla Suri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
