GRASI DALAM KASUS NARKOTIKA DI ANTARA KEBIJAKAN KEADILAN DAN UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM
Abstract
This research examines the process of giving mercy to drug prisoners and if it supports criminal law's drug crime prevention goals. Drug offences in Indonesia are regarded extreme crimes that destroy social order and affect the younger generation, hence they are generally sentenced to death or life in prison. The President's power under Article 14 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 22 of 2002 respecting Clemency allows offenders to request clemency. Granted pardon to drug offenders creates a conflict between severe law enforcement to prevent and rehabilitation and social reintegration. This research employs normative, statutory, and juridical-analytical methods. The 1945 Constitution, Law No. 22 of 2002 on Clemency, and Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, as well as court rulings on drug clemency, are examined in this paper. To understand how mercy is applied to drug offences, retributive, utilitarian, and rehabilitative philosophies of punishment were examined. This research found that although clemency may help rehabilitate offenders, it might also impair drug crime deterrence. To prevent reoffending, drug clemency must be backed by a thorough rehabilitation program and based on tougher and more open standards. Thus, clemency policy change is required to reconcile justice, prevention, and rehabilitation in Indonesian criminal law.
Downloads
References
Adhar, S., Marlina, M., & Affan, I. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pecandu Dan Penyalahguna Narkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kisaran Nomor 296/Pid. Sus/2021/PN. Kis). Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 3(3), 793–817.
Alfange Jr, Dean. (1969). Jeremy Bentham and the codification of law. HeinOnline. https://home.heinonline.org/
Arief, S., Muhtar, M. H., & Saragih, G. M. (2023). UPAYA PEMBELAAN DIRI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERSAMAAN DI HADAPAN HUKUM. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v16i1.475
Armitage, D. (2011). GLOBALIZING JEREMY BENTHAM. History of Political Thought, 32(1), 63–82.
Dao, L. (2023). Hollow law and utilitarian law: The devaluing of deportation hearings in New York City and Paris. Law & Society Review, 57(3), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12665
Harcourt, B. E. (2013). Beccaria’s ‘On Crimes and Punishments’: A Mirror on the History of the Foundations of Modern Criminal Law (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2296605). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2296605
Jensen, K. B. (2020). A Theory of Communication and Justice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751207
Kant, I. (2011). Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A German–English edition. Cambridge University Press.
Kholiq, M. A. (2007). Kontroversi Hukuman Mati dan Kebijakan Regulasinya dalam RUU KUHP (Studi Komparatif Menurut Hukum Islam). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss2.art1
Leechaianan, Y., & Longmire, D. R. (2013). The Use of the Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand: A Comparative Legal Analysis. Laws, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws2020115
M. ARIF RUJIANTO, N. 06360039. (2013). GRASI BAGI NARAPIDANA NARKOBA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF [Skripsi, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA]. https://doi.org/10/small.jpg
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Ke-12. Kencana.
Mene, M. (2022). HAK GRASI PRESIDEN DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v4i3.748
Newman, G., & Marongiu, P. (1990). Penological Reform and the Myth of Beccaria. Criminology, 28(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01328.x
Novak, A. (2015). Transparency and Comparative Executive Clemency: Global Lessons for Pardon Reform in the United States. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 49, 817.
Pascoe, D. (2014). Clemency in Southeast Asian Death Penalty Cases (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2459414). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459414
Paulson, C. (2004). Compliance With Final Judgments of the International Court of Justice Since 1987. American Journal of International Law, 98(3), 434–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/3181640
Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course: Race and Class Inequality in U.S. Incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900201
Pradani, A., & Tan, W. (2022). Analisis Tentang Pemberian Grasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3443
Rosyid, M. (2018). Imbas Konsistensi Hukuman Mati pada Hubungan Bilateral dalam Kasus Narkoba. YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 255–280.
Sifris, R. (2007). Balancing Abolitionism and Cooperation on the World’s Scale: The Case of the Bali Nine. Federal Law Review, 35(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.22145/flr.35.1.3
Sumardi, D., Umar, M. N., Sangaji, R., Yunus, F. M., & Akbar, R. (2022). Transition of Civil Law to Public Law: Integration of Modern Punishment Theory in Criminal Apostasy. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(1). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/523012217.pdf
Utami, N. S. B. (2008). PROBLEMATIKA PERMOHONAN GRASI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2002. OLD WEBSITE OF JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16318
Verreycken, Q. (2019). The power to pardon in late medieval and early modern Europe: New perspectives in the history of crime and criminal justice. History Compass, 17(6), e12575. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12575
Zizek, S. (2012). Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. Verso Books.
Copyright (c) 2024 Irlan Puluhulawa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.