PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DRIVER GRAB YANG MENGALAMI PESANAN FIKTIF PADA ERA GIG ECONOMY
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the legal relationship between Grab drivers and Grab platform in the context of gig economy in Banyumas Regency, as well as legal protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders. This research uses normative juridical and empirical juridical methods. The research data includes primary data from direct interviews with several drivers in Banyumas Regency and supported by secondary and tertiary data. The data analysis method uses qualitative analysis method. The first research result shows that the relationship between the driver and the platform arises due to a partnership agreement that gives birth to balanced rights and obligations between the parties. In practice, the relationship between drivers and platforms looks like a working relationship where there are elements of orders, wages, and work as well as relationships such as superiors and subordinates that create imbalances in the existing partnership agreement. So it looks like a pseudo-partnership relationship. When viewed in Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2021 concerning Creative Economy Development, Grab drivers are included in the type of freelancers with a partnership pattern system using a profit-sharing system regulated in article 4 and article 33. However, these rules still do not provide adequate legal protection for online ojek drivers. The second research result, legal protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders is still limited. The Grab platform provides protection by providing a reimbursement mechanism, which has been stated in the partnership agreement between the driver and the Grab platform. The unclear legal relationship between Grab drivers and the platform in the Gig Economy era in Banyumas causes weak protection for drivers who experience fictitious orders.
Downloads
References
Journal article
Ayunita, Y., Yahanan, A., & Syaifuddin, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengemudi Taksi (Mitra) Berbasis Online Pada Pt. Grab Indonesia. Lex LATA, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v1i1.263
Dian Aditya Arif, Rahmatul Hidayati, H. L. A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Mitra Driver Gojek dalam Transaksi Online Orderan Fiktif. Dinamika, 28.
Latri, A. A., Riyanto, R. K., Firdaus, M. B., Gaung, M., & Arjuna, S. (2024). Hak Pekerja di Era Gig economy : Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Lepas dan Kontrak. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2), 375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11770885
Muklis. (2023). Analisis Ganti Kerugian Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Perdata. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v4i1.326
Ramadhan, A., Holyness N Singadimedja, & Rr. Janti Surjanti. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Penyedia Platform terhadap Pekerja Gig (Gig Worker) dalam Hubungan Kemitraan atas Wanprestasi Pembeli Ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Padjadjaran Law Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v10i2.1025
Book References
Hernawan, A., Novianto, A., & Wulansari, A. D. (2024). Kemitraan Semu dalam Ekonomi Gig di Indonesia: Analisis Terhadap Kondisi Pekerja Berstatus Mitra. IGPA Press.
Keban, Y. T., Hernawan, A., & Novianto, A. (2021). Menyoal Kerja Layak dan Adil dalam Ekonomi Gig di Indonesia. IGPA Press.
Miles, M. B., Penerjemah, A. M. H. ;, & Tjetjep Rohendi ; pendamping, M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif : buku sumber tentang metode metode baru. UI Press.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2018). Hukum responsif. Nusa Media.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Press.
Willy Farianto. (2019). Pola Hubungan Hukum Pemberi Kerja dan Pekerja: Hubungan Kerja Kemitraan dan Keagenan (1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.
Conference Proceeding References
Sihombing, R. S. T., Handoko, M., & Joellen, R. C. (2024). Analisis Kualitas Kerja Pekerja Gig di Jawa Barat: Tinjauan Berbasis Data Sakernas Agustus 2019-2022. Proceedings of National Conference West Java Economic Society (WJES), 1, 4. https://wjes.or.id/prosiding/index.php/cfp/article/view/24
Dissertation or Thesis References
Andi Setiawan. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Driver Grabfood Terhadap Orderan Fiktif Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata Sebagai Tindakan Wanprestasi. Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya.
Elsy Amanda Virginila. (2024). Perjanjian Kemitraan Kerja Antara Driver (Gojek) Dengan Pt. Goto Gojek Tokopedia Tbk. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Maolana Nur Insan. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Driver Grab Pada Pembatalan Sepihak Oleh Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Grabfood Pt. Grab Teknologi Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif. UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH.
Webpage on a Website References
Grab. (n.d.). Ada pemotongan dana pada saldo Dompet Tunai, Kredit atau OVO Saya. Retrieved December 27, 2024, from Setiap Mitra Pengemudi yang menerima tugas akan dikenakan potongan komisi sebesar 20%25 dari total tarif. Pemotongan ini dilakukan secara otomatis dengan mengurangi saldo pada dompet kredit Anda setiap kali pekerjaan diterima.%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A
Grab. (2024a). Ketentuan Layanan dan Kebijakan. https://www.grab.com/id/terms-policies/transport-delivery-logistics/
Grab. (2024b). Syarat dan Ketentuan Umum Penjual. https://www.grab.com/id/merchant/food/merchant-terms/
Copyright (c) 2024 Ery Charmelita Raska, Susilo Wardani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.