PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA TERHADAP PEMBATALAN KONTRAK LUMPSUM SEPIHAK
Abstract
Another form of potential dispute that will arise is in the form of a contractual relationship that occurs due to a lump sum contract using a type of construction contract from the government to the private sector. This form can be seen from the inequality of the parties' positions. In practice, "lump sum contracts are often interpreted freely, causing misperceptions between Service Users and Service Providers, such as the words "fixed price" and the sentence "all risks are borne by the service provider". The free perception of "fixed price" means that the price may not be changed at all, no matter what happens. While the perception of the sentence "all risks are borne by the service provider" is wildly interpreted that all risks, including changes at the request of the Service User or due to changes in design, are the full responsibility of the Service Provider. "This can trigger an inequality of justice where in practice the things mentioned above can happen at any time, so the contractor (private) sometimes does not get the fulfillment of the rights to the achievements that have been agreed upon through the contract. The research method used is a normative type of research. The research technique is carried out by adjusting it to the established research approach. For research with the aim of drawing legal principles in a law. The competence of the State Administrative Court as a litigation dispute resolution mechanism for the parties to the case, has the authority to adjudicate administrative disputes included in the object of the State Administrative Decision in this case the form of government action in unilaterally canceling the contract through a state administrative decision issued by an authorized official and has a detrimental impact on the contractor or individual/private legal entity.
Downloads
References
Adha, Lalu Hadi. “Kontrak Build Operate Transfer Sebagai Perjanjian Kebijakan Pemerintah Dengan Pihak Swasta.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 3 (2011): 548–58. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.181.
Adolph, Ralph. “Eksistensi Ptun Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Warga Negara Dari Sikap Tindak Administrasi Negara” 1945 (2016): 1–23.
Agus Iswahyudi, Sami’an, Sarwono Hardjomuljadi. “PENGELOLAAN RISIKO PENERAPAN KONTRAK LUMPSUM BAGI PENYEDIA JASA DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KONTRAKTUAL BERDASARKAN HUKUM KONSTRUKSI INDONESIA, FIDIC, JICA, DAN AIA.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Masyarakat 16, no. 1 (2025): 97–110. https://oaj.jurnalhst.com/index.php/jhpm/article/view/8796/9905.
Anggraita, Wening. “Perlindungam Hukum Atas Keluarnya Peraturan Kebijakan (Beleidsregel)” VOL.7/NO.7 (2021): 464–87.
Anggriani Alamsyah. “Perkembangan Paradigma Administrasi Publik (New Public Administration, New Public Management dan New Public Service).” Jurnal Politik Profetik 4, no. 2 (2016): 172–99.
Atmoko, Dwi. “Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Suatu Perjanjian Baku.” Binamulia Hukum 11, no. 1 (2022): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i1.683.
Dian Karisma dan Dyah Listyarini. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Diedit oleh Agus Wibowo. Semarang: Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik Bekerja sama dengan Universitas Sains & Teknologi Komputer (Universitas STEKOM), 2023.
Habibi, Dani. “Perbandingan Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Verwaltungsgerecht sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Rakyat.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 1 (2019): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v21i1.12185.
Hadi, Fikri, Farina Gandryani, dan Dwi Elok Indriastuti. “Tanggung Gugat Pemerintah Terhadap Pembatalan Hasil Tender Secara Sepihak.” Wijaya Putra Law Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v1i1.65.
Herlina, Nina. “Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi Dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 7, no. 2 (2019): 190. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v7i2.2917.
Hidayanti, Sri dan Muannaif Ridwan. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Rahasia Perusahaan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan 3, no. 1 (2021): 40–41.
Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik. “Presiden Republik Indonesia Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia.” Demographic Research, 2000, 4–7.
“KUHPER: Kitab UU Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek),” 2007.
Nur, Dr.Solikin. Buku Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, 2021.
“Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan Setelahmenempuh Upaya Administratif.” Jdih Bpk. MAHKAMAH AGUNG, 2018. https://www.pta-bengkulu.go.id/images/pdf_trans_perkara/sk_kma_26_2012.pdf.
Safitri, Erna Dwi, dan Nabitatus Sa’adah. “Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45.
Somantri, Dikdik. “Challenges in Execution of Court Decision To Strengthen the Administrative Court Charisma.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, no. 2 (2021): 123–40. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.422021.123-140.
“Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,” n.d.
“Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintah (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014, Nomor 292, Penjelasan Dalam Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5601),” 2014.
Utami, Pangestika Rizki. “Penerapan Prinsip Hukum Perjanjian dalam Kontrak Kerjasama Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 3, no. 1 (2020): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i1.3512.
Wirawan, Vani. “Alternatif Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Mafia Tanah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Pertanahan.” Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (2022): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v7i1.6195.
Zamzami, Abid. “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik.” Yurispruden 3, no. 2 (2020): 200. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v3i2.6736.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abu Thalhah Al Anshari, Maheswari Queena Dewani, Shintia Januarita, Wilhelmina Setia Atmadja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




