MOTIF IDEOLOGI, POLITIK, KEAMANAN: TINJAUAN ASPEK PEMBUKTIAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME DI INDONESIA

Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan Assegaf; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Bonari Tua Silalahi

doi:10.56301/csj.v8i1.1620

Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan Assegaf Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
Christine Natalia Pangaribuan Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
Bonari Tua Silalahi Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i1.1620

Keywords: Motive, Ideology, Politics, Security Disturbance, Proof in Terrorism Cases

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism (Law No. 5/2018) incorporates the element of motive ideology, politics, or security disturbance within the definition of terrorism, signifying a crucial assertion in Indonesian penal policy. This research, employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and limited secondary data-based case analysis approaches, scrutinizes the fundamental problematics associated with said motive element. The findings indicate that the absence of an operational definition for the motive phrase in the Law's elucidation engenders ambiguity. Regarding its legal status, it remains debatable whether it functions as a general qualification or a constitutive element of the offense (delict) that necessitates proof under each criminal provision. Furthermore, the substantiation of subjective motive presents a significant challenge in judicial practice. Consequently, the implementation of this motive element potentially fosters legal uncertainty and the risk of subjectivity in law enforcement. This study recommends limited amendments to the Law, the issuance of interpretative guidelines by the Supreme Court, and internal directives for law enforcement agencies to ensure legal certainty and the observance of Human Rights in combating terrorism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. Z. (2021). Analisis yuridis terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme dalam hubungan dengan hak azasi manusia. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 13(1), 26–35.

B. M. T. (2021). Penegakan hukum terhadap terorisme (Legal justice versus social justice). Farha Pustaka.

Bardi, A. (2023). Pengaturan kualifikasi terorisme dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme dan perbandingannya dengan negara lain. Jatiswara, 38(1).

Carolina, A. (2019). Deradikalisasi berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 2018. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 13(3), 9.

Citranu. (2020). Tindak pidana terorisme berdasarkan perspektif belom bahadat. Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1).

Harahap, M. R., Saragih, Y. M., Sitorus, T., & Sembiring, F. (2024). Role of the prosecution in overcoming criminal acts of terrorism. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2(1), 156–164.

Lestari, N. A. S. S., Tusyadiah, H., Purwati, S. A. R., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Analisis perilaku dan motivasi serta peranan psikologi dalam tindak pidana terorisme. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 319–335.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Makar - Direktori Putusan. Retrieved May 29, 2025, from https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html?q=makar

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2018). PUTUSAN Nomor 73/PUU-XVI/2018 Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Retrieved May 29, 2025, from https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/73_PUU-XVI_2018.pdf

Nugraha, E. F., Kristyanto, G. H., & Darusman, Y. M. (2024). Ratio decidendi hakim dalam memutuskan perkara tindak pidana terorisme dan pendanaan terorisme (Studi Putusan Nomor 604/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT.Tim). Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(1), 109–145.

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur. (2014). Putusan No. 591/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim.

Pramahardika, W., & Syarief, V. G. (2022). Counter-terrorism dalam upaya pencegahan terorisme ISIS di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 10(2), 435–451.

Putri, A. W. (2024). Analisis yuridis urgensi keberadaan motif dalam pembuktian tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Universitas Lampung.

Putri, D. P. A., Salindri, I., & Satria, Y. R. N. (n.d.). Analisis penerapan asas retroaktif dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 167/PID. B/2003/PN. DPS terkait kasus tindak pidana terorisme Bom Bali 1. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 2(1).

Rochim, A. I., Nasution, U. C. M., & Wahyudi, E. (2023). Identification of terrorism actions in Indonesia. Society, 11(2), 415–433.

Safran, A. A. H. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tindak pidana pengancaman pemboman masjid (Studi Putusan Nomor: 582/Pid. Sus/2021/PN. Mks) [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Hasanuddin.

Saragih, Y. M., & Lubis, M. R. (2021). The effectiveness of Mahkota witnesses (Kroon Getuide) evidence on narcotics abuse. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 5(1), 137–150.

Saragih, Y. M., Hasibuan, M. I., Sulaiman, Ginting, R. P., & Pratama, F. A. (2023). Juridical analysis of eradication of criminal acts of terrorism In Indonesia. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 3(3), 768–778.

Saragih, Y. M., Sujira, D., Ramadhan, G., & Nasution, F. H. (2023). Law enforcement of terrorism crimes in the police area. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Islamic Community Studies 2023. Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi.

Saragih, Y. M., Tarigan, C. A. P., Meliala, N. M. S., & Hutabarat, R. A. C. (2024). Peran masyarakat dalam pencegahan dan penanggulangan tindak pidana terorisme di Indonesia. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(1), 139–147.

Umam, M. M., & Arifin, R. (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi saksi dan korban dari tindak pidana terorisme. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 3(2), 57–67.

Yudi, G., & Nawas, A. (2024). Analisa dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terkait dengan tindak pidana terorisme (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 1108/Pid. Sus/2020/PN Jkt. Utr). IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 4(4), 111–125.

Zarzani, T. N. (2020). Rekonstruksi hukum pidana dalam upaya penanggulangan tindak pidana terorisme di Indonesia berbasis nilai keadilan [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.

Zarzani, T. R., Fitrianto, B., & Annisa, S. (2024). The idea of renewing terrorism criminal law in Indonesia as an effort to overcome terrorism based on the justice values. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 8(1), 38–55.