PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN

Try Krisna Monarchi; Yetti; Yeni Triana

doi:10.56301/csj.v8i1.1651

Try Krisna Monarchi Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Yetti Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Yeni Triana Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i1.1651

Keywords: PKPU, mortgage rights, collateral execution, creditors, legal certainty, lex posterior, legal smuggling

Abstract

The Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Law (UUK-PKPU) provides space for debtors to postpone debt payments and restructure their obligations. However, the existence of a 90-day stay provision in the PKPU process has caused serious problems with the rights of creditors holding mortgage rights, especially in efforts to carry out collateral execution. This study aims to analyze the application of the provision in the context of legal protection of creditors, review its compatibility with the principles of legal certainty and justice, and criticize the potential for legal smuggling that may occur in practice. Through a normative approach and literature study, including linking the conflict of norms between UUK-PKPU and the Mortgage Rights Law (UUHT), this article shows that the dominance of the lex posterior derogat legi priori principle in this context often ignores substantive justice for creditors. The results of this study emphasize the need for legal reform of the PKPU stay period and the balancing of protection between debtors and creditors in the process of postponing debt payment obligations. These findings reinforce the urgency of regulatory reorganization to prevent irregularities in the implementation of bankruptcy law in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami Chazawi. (2005). Tindak pidana mengenai kesopanan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Makalah penegakan hukum. Diakses dari Google pada 10 September 2012, pukul 20:02 WIB.

Desy Ratnasari, D., Husni Thamrin, H., & Sisilia, S. (2022). Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Barat. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 5(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v5i2.638

Hasibuan, I., & Sunariyo, S. (2023). Analisis yuridis perbuatan penyuapan dalam tindak pidana korupsi. The Juris, 7(2), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i2.1051

Husni Thamrin, H., Adi Wijaya, A., & Fransisca Purna Damayanti, F. P. (2020). Efektifitas penegakan Undang-Undang No 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak terkait kekerasan terhadap anak. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 3(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v3i2.474

Kadarudin, K., Husni Thamrin, H., & Arpina, A. (2021). Peran dan hak masyarakat dalam perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup menurut Undang-Undang No 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 4(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v4i2.479

Karita Sakharina, I., Noor, S. M., Hendrapati, M., Amin Daud, A., Maasba Magassing, A., & Kadarudin, K. (2018). Konvensi hak anak sebagai instrumen penanganan anak-anak korban kekerasan dan eksploitasi. The Juris, 2(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v2i2.38

Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (2010). Kejahatan terhadap kepentingan hukum negara (Edisi kedua). Sinar Grafika.

Mutiara, D. (1962). Tafsiran KUHP. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sultan, N., Nursanthy, A. T. R., & Kursiswanti, E. T. (2024). Love scamming dalam jerat hukum pidana. The Juris, 8(2), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i2.1440