INKONSISTENSI HUKUM PENGATURAN PENGEMBALIAN UANG HASIL KORUPSI DARI PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM
Abstract
From the perspective of legal certainty, inconsistency in the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds can create uncertainty in the implementation of the law and the legal process in general. Inconsistency or inconsistency between these three regulations can create confusion in the legal process related to the return of corruption proceeds. Legal certainty is an important principle in the legal system that demands consistency and clarity in the applicable regulations. Therefore, there needs to be an effort to formulate more consistent and comprehensive regulations regarding the return of corruption proceeds to ensure better legal certainty. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal inconsistency of the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds from the perspective of legal certainty and to analyze the legal consequences of the inconsistency of the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds from the perspective of legal certainty. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Inconsistency of the Law on the Return of Corruption Proceeds from the Perspective of Legal Certainty is that the Indonesian legal system is weak in guaranteeing legal certainty. Multi-interpretable legal provisions, the absence of standard asset return mechanisms, and inconsistent judicial practices create confusion in implementation.
Downloads
References
Alkostar, A. (2008). Kerugian keuangan negara dalam perspektif tindak pidana korupsi. Varia Peradilan, (275).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2017). Perihal undang-undang. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Sekitar masalah korupsi: Aspek nasional dan internasional. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Garnasih, Y. (n.d.). Anti pencucian uang di Indonesia dan kelemahan implementasinya (suatu tinjauan awal). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Depkumham RI, 3(4), 135–147.
Hartanti, E. (2009). Tindak pidana korupsi (Edisi ke-2). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (n.d.). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa.
Musahib, A. R. (2015). Pengembalian keuangan negara hasil tindak pidana korupsi. eJurnal Katalogis, 3(1). http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/Katalogis/article/download/4242/3157
Mustajab, Y., & Tajuddin, M. A. (2018). Uang pengganti sebagai alternatif pengembalian kerugian negara dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 2(1).
Nelson, F. M. (2020). Sistem peradilan pidana dan penanggulangan korupsi di Indonesia. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Pardede, R. (2021). Proses pengembalian kerugian negara akibat korupsi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Renggong, R. (2016). Hukum pidana khusus: Memahami delik-delik di luar KUHP. Jakarta: Kencana.
Supandji, H. (2009, Februari 27). Peningkatan pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi dalam pelaksanaan tugas kejaksaan. Makalah disampaikan dalam Kuliah Umum di Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Widjojanto, B. (2012). Negara hukum, korupsi dan hak asasi manusia: Suatu kajian awal. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 3(1).
Witanto, D. Y. (2013). Diskresi hakim: Sebuah instrumen menegakkan keadilan substantif dalam perkara-perkara pidana. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmat Tul Qadri, Bagio Kadaryanto, Yelia Nathassa Winstar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
