STUDI KOMPARATIF SEJARAH PERADILAN MILITER DI INDONESIA DENGAN PERADILAN ANGKATAN BERSENJATA DI MALAYSIA

  • Gunawan Widjaja Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia
  • Wagiman Martedjo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sudrajat Mukti Nugroho Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Comparative Study, Military Courts of Indonesia and Malaysia

Abstract

Every country in the world has its own military court system with its own unique history, yet they share some commonalities in terms of their primary functions and roles. Similarly, the history of military courts in Indonesia and Malaysia differs significantly. The military court system in Indonesia is the implementation of judicial authority within the military to enforce just and fair legal proceedings. (See: Selected Cases in Military Court Proceedings. https://dilmil-aceh.go.id/tentang-peradilan-militer/) Meanwhile, the military court system in the Kingdom of Malaysia is a military judicial institution that forms part of the integrated military power structure. It also carries out the task of safeguarding the integrity of the territory and sovereignty of the Kingdom of Malaysia, protecting it from various threats and disturbances from within and without. This research uses the normative legal method. The results of this research reveal fundamental differences between the military court system in the Republic of Indonesia and that of the Kingdom of Malaysia. The military justice system in the Republic of Indonesia is an independent system, not part of the general justice system. This is because it has the primary duty of maintaining integrity; protecting and defending the sovereignty of the nation and state. Meanwhile, the military court of the Armed Forces of the Kingdom of Malaysia has the responsibility of supporting civil authority in countering international disturbances, maintaining public order, handling natural disasters, and participating in national development programmes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiroeddin Sjarif. (2006). Hukum Disiplin Militer Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Amiruddin & H. Zainal Asikin. (2003). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Andrew Phang. (2006). From Foundation to Legacy: The Second Charter of Justice. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law.
https://law.smu.edu.sg/sites/law.smu.edu.sg/files/law/pdf/andrewphang_6.pdf
Asep N. Mulyana. (2020). Hukum Pidana Militer Kontemporer. Jakarta: Gramedia Wirasarana Indonesia.
Azhar S.H., M.Sc., L.L.M., L.L.D & Abdul Halim S.Ip., M.A. (1987). Hukum Internasional: Sebuah Pengenalan.
http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/index.shtml
Budi Pramono. (2020). Peradilan Militer Indonesia. Jakarta: Scopindo.
Chionh, Mavis & Tan, Kevin (Eds.). (2005). Essays in Singapore Legal History. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law; Marshall Cavendish Academic.
Dini Dewi Heniarti. (2017). Sistem Peradilan Militer di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Refika Aditama.
E.Y. Kanter & S.R. Sianturi. (2012). Hukum Pidana Militer. Jakarta: Alumni AHM-STHM.
Himawan Soetanto, Bantu Hardjijo, & Agus Gunaedi Pribadi. (2010). Perebutan Wilayah Nanyo: Seri Sejarah Militer Serangan Jepang ke Hindia Belanda Pada Masa Perang Dunia II 1942. Jakarta: Predana.
https://dilmilti1-medan.go.id/sejarah-peradilan-militer/#:~:text=Yurisdiksi%20Peradilan%20Militer%20juga%20telah,oleh%20prajurit%20di%20daerah%20pertempuran.&text=Pengadilan%20Militer%20Tinggi%20memiliki%20kewenangan%20:
JURIST | School of Law | University of Pittsburgh. (2020). www.law.pitt.edu
John Rawls. (2015). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
https://journals.openedition.org/assr/28265
Kapita Selekta Proses Perkara di Pengadilan Militer.
https://dilmil-aceh.go.id/tentang-peradilan-militer/
Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Buku Putih Pertahanan Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertahanan RI.
Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Desain Organisasi Sebagai Jawaban Terhadap Harmonisasi Tugas dan Fungsi Antar Satuan Kerja yang Sering Terlupakan.
https://www.kemhan.go.id/pusbmn/2019/05/23/desain-organisasi-sebagai-jawaban-terhadap-harmonisasi-tugas-dan-fungsi-antar-satuan-kerja-yang-sering-terlupakan.html
Majalah Info Singkat Hukum. (2016). Pembentukan Kebijakan Reformasi Hukum, Vol. VIII, No. 19/I/P3DI/Oktober/2016.
https://dilmilti1-medan.go.id/sejarah-peradilan-militer/
Marcus Priyo Gunarto. (2000). Redefinisi Perbuatan Pidana Pada Peradilan Militer. Yogyakarta: FH UGM.
Moch. Faisal Salam. (2006). Hukum Acara Pidana Militer di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Bandar Maju.
Moch. Faisal Salam. (2006). Hukum Pidana Militer di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Bandar Maju.
Muntoha. (2013). Negara Hukum Indonesia Pasca Perubahan UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara.
Nasaruddin Umar. Studi Hukum Perbandingan Sistem Ketatanegaraan Malaysia dan Indonesia.
https://www.academia.edu/download/62109972/8-Nasaruddin_Umar20200215-60666-11wmdzv.pdf
Peradilan Militer Belanda di Indonesia Sebelum dan Sesudah Perang Dunia II.
https://dilmil-jayapura.go.id/sejarah-2/
Petrik Manasi. (2011). Sejarah Tentara. Yogyakarta: CV. Narasi.
Phang, Andrew. (2006). From Foundation to Legacy: The Second Charter of Justice. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law.
Prof. Dr. Zulfa Djoko Basuki, SH., MH.
https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/prof-zulfa-makalah.pdf
Rawls, John. (2015). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
RM. Siregar. Tinjauan Yuridis Konvensi Jenewa IV Tahun 1949 terhadap Negara-negara yang Berperang.
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/14990-ID
S.R. Sianturi. (2010). Hukum Pidana Militer di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum TNI.
Teo, Say Eng. (2009). Military Legal Proceeding in Malaysia. Selangor: Lexis Nexis.
Wagiman. (2022). Terminologi Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Published
2025-12-24
How to Cite
Widjaja, G., Martedjo, W., & Nugroho, S. M. (2025). STUDI KOMPARATIF SEJARAH PERADILAN MILITER DI INDONESIA DENGAN PERADILAN ANGKATAN BERSENJATA DI MALAYSIA. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i2.1720