PERUBAHAN PIDANA DARI KUHP LAMA KE BARU SALAH SATU ADALAH REFORMASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM
Abstract
Criminal law reform in Indonesia marks a significant shift from the old Penal Code (KUHP) to the new KUHP, aimed at strengthening law enforcement, ensuring legal certainty, and protecting human rights (HR). This reform reflects the necessity of a modern criminal justice system that is responsive to democratic demands and oriented towards substantive justice. One of the main aspects of the reform is the emphasis on progressive legal principles, including the protection of human rights during law enforcement processes and recognition of victims' rights. The new KUHP introduces more diversified punishment mechanisms, alternative criminal resolutions, and clearer provisions regarding criminal liability, including for corporate crimes. The reform underscores the importance of balancing state interests with individual protection within the criminal justice system. Thus, law enforcement focuses not only on repressive aspects but also on preventive, restorative, and rehabilitative measures. This study highlights the transformation of criminal norms, changes in legal structures, and the practical impact of the new KUHP on law enforcement practices in Indonesia. The analysis employs normative and descriptive juridical approaches, examining amended, deleted, or added articles and their implications for criminal justice institutions, including the police, prosecutors, courts, and correctional facilities. The results indicate that KUHP reform not only updates legal norms but also shifts the paradigm of law enforcement towards a more humane and democratic approach. Implementation challenges, such as law enforcement capacity, public awareness, and harmonization with other regulations, are crucial factors determining the effectiveness of this reform. In conclusion, the new KUHP represents a significant milestone in establishing a fair, transparent criminal law system oriented towards human rights protection, while simultaneously strengthening the legitimacy of law enforcement in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Ahli, A. (2015). Hukum Pidana dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ahli, A. (2015). Hukum Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Arief, B. N. (2014). Hukum Pidana dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dinah, S. (2010). Human Rights in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fuller, L. L. (1964). The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (2012). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (2016). Victim Protection in Criminal Law. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Hoof, E. M. C. van. (2015). Child Rights and Juvenile Justice. Leiden: Brill.
Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell & Russell.
Parry, J. T. (2012). Transparency and Accountability in Criminal Justice. New York: Routledge.
Prasetyo, T. (2017). Reformasi Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2013). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2013). Hukum Progresif. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Shelton, D. (2010). Human Rights in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soeharsono. (2016). Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Kajian Teoritis dan Praktis. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Soesilo, R. (1985). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations.
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Yusuf DM, Boby Putra Ramadhan Sebayang, Zulkarnaini, Ridho Wira Turnip, Herman Saputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
