Kewenangan Penentuan Status Gangguan Jiwa Pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Penyidikan Di Satreskrim Polresta Pekanbaru

  • David Hendra Univesitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Indra Afrita Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Tri Anggara Putra Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Keywords: Investigator Authority, Mental Disorder, Criminal Offense

Abstract

The determination of mental disorder status of criminal offenders constitutes a crucial aspect in the investigation process, as it directly relates to criminal responsibility and the protection of human rights. In the investigative practices of the Criminal Investigation Unit (Satreskrim) of Pekanbaru City Police, investigators’ authority in determining the mental condition of suspects often encounters normative and practical limitations, particularly in coordination with medical professionals and mental health institutions. This study aims to analyze the authority of investigators in determining the mental disorder status of criminal offenders and to examine its implementation during the investigation process. This research employs a sociological legal research method, using an empirical approach that views law as social behavior. Data were collected through literature review of statutory regulations and criminal law doctrines, as well as interviews with investigators of Satreskrim Polresta Pekanbaru and related parties. The findings indicate that investigators do not possess the authority to independently determine a suspect’s mental disorder status; such determination must be conducted by authorized medical professionals upon the investigator’s request. However, in practice, several obstacles persist, including limited facilities, complex administrative procedures, and insufficient understanding among suspects and their families regarding psychiatric examination processes. Therefore, regulatory strengthening, enhanced inter-sectoral coordination, and capacity building for investigators are necessary to ensure legal certainty, justice, and the protection of human rights in the investigation process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017.
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Dahlan Thaib, Kedaulatan Rakyat, Negara Hukum dan Konstitusi, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.
Dedi Soemardi, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Indhillco, 1997.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
Eugen Ehrlich, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2002.
Gustav Radbruch, Legal Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950.
H. M. Laica Marzuki, Berjalan-Jalan di Ranah Hukum, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.
Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
Herbert L. Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
Jeremias Lemek, Mencari Keadilan: Pandangan Kritis terhadap Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Galang Press, 2007.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2014.
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
King, L. A., Psikologi Umum: Sebuah Pandangan Apresiatif, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2010.
Lawrence M. Friedman, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.
Lilik Mulyadi, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni, 2012.
Max Weber, Economy and Society, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Miriam Budiardjo, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2015.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP, 2015.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2010.
Nevid, Jeffrey S., Spencer A. Rathus, dan Beverly Greene, Psikologi Abnormal, Terjemahan Tim Psikologi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2005.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2012.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 2011.
R. Soesilo, Hukum Acara Pidana, Bogor: Politeia, 2013.
Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.
Roeslan Saleh, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983.
Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum dan Masyarakat, Bandung: Angkasa, 2010.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2010.
Talcott Parsons, The Social System, London: Routledge, 1991.
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017.
Todung Mulya Lubis, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Pembangunan, Jakarta: LP3ES, 2014.
Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Published
2026-01-05
How to Cite
Hendra, D., Afrita, I., & Putra, T. A. (2026). Kewenangan Penentuan Status Gangguan Jiwa Pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Penyidikan Di Satreskrim Polresta Pekanbaru. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i2.2014