Penolakan STTP Penyampaian Pendapat di Muka Umum Oleh Pihak Kepolisian Dalam Persfektif Keadilan Sosial
Abstract
The freedom to express opinions in public is a constitutional right guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and further regulated by statutory laws. In practice, the exercise of this right often encounters obstacles, one of which is the refusal by the police to issue a Notice Receipt Letter (STTP). Such refusal may create legal and social problems, particularly when it is conducted without clear and proportional legal grounds, thereby potentially undermining the principle of social justice. This study aims to analyze the refusal of STTP for public demonstrations by the police from the perspective of social justice. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, which are analyzed through qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that any refusal to issue an STTP must be based on objective, proportional, and accountable legal considerations, while respecting human rights and the principle of social justice. Arbitrary, discriminatory, or non-transparent refusals may restrict citizens’ access to their constitutional rights. Therefore, a balanced approach is required between maintaining public order and safeguarding citizens’ rights to ensure that the exercise of public expression can be carried out in a democratic and socially just manner.
Downloads
References
Arief, B. N. (2011). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan hak asasi manusia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Dicey, A. V. (1959). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. London: Macmillan.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law (Revised ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Peradaban.
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law (Trans. M. Knight). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laski, H. J. (1935). The state in theory and practice. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Muladi. (2002). Demokrasi, hak asasi manusia, dan reformasi hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Habibie Center.
Radbruch, G. (1959). Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaften. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag.
Radbruch, G. (2003). Rechtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag.
Radbruch, G. (2003). Rechtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum dan masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan masyarakat. Jakarta: Kompas.
Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Soekanto, S. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum: paradigma, metode, dan dinamika masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jamaluddin, Ardiansah, Andrizal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
