TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN KONSTITUSIONAL TERHADAP DEBITOR

Don Saflan; Eddy Asnawi; Robert Libra

doi:10.56301/csj.v8i2.2030

Don Saflan Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Eddy Asnawi Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Robert Libra Program Pascasarjana Magister Hukum, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i2.2030

Keywords: Constitutional Protection, Constitutional Court Decision, Rule of Law

Abstract

Constitutional protection for debtors constitutes a crucial issue within a state governed by the rule of law, particularly following the issuance of Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 02/PUU-XIX/2021, which corrected law enforcement practices related to the execution of fiduciary guarantees. This research aims to analyze the constitutional protection afforded to debtors and the legal consequences arising after the decision, viewed from a constitutional law perspective. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, analytical, and historical approaches. The legal materials examined consist of statutory regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, as well as legal doctrines and opinions of legal scholars. The findings indicate that Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 02/PUU-XIX/2021 has significantly strengthened the position of debtors as subjects of law who possess constitutional rights to fair legal certainty, protection from arbitrary actions, and respect for human rights. The decision affirms that debtor–creditor relations are not merely within the realm of private law but are also subject to the principles of the rule of law and constitutional supremacy. The legal implications of the decision include the obligation to adjust statutory regulations, a paradigm shift in law enforcement from formal legal certainty toward substantive justice, and the reinforcement of the Constitutional Court’s role as the guardian of citizens’ constitutional rights. Consequently, this decision serves as an essential constitutional foundation for realizing fair legal protection for debtors in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan hak asasi manusia. Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Perkembangan dan konsolidasi lembaga negara pasca reformasi. Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Hukum acara pengujian undang-undang. Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2018). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Rajawali Pers.

Febriyanti, W. D. R. (2020). Eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2).

Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law. Yale University Press.

Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Peradaban.

Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press.

Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Radbruch, G. (2003). Rechtsphilosophie. Koehler Verlag.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan masyarakat. Kompas.

Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Sayuti, A. T., & Erwita, Y. (2020). Parate dalam eksekusi jaminan fidusia: Urgensi dan rekonstruksi hukum setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Soematra Law Review, 3(2).

Siahaan, M. (2011). Hukum acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Konstitusi Press.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2013). Hukum: Paradigma, metode dan dinamika masalahnya. ELSAM.