HUKUMAN PIDANA KE KEADILAN RESTORATIF: REINTEGRASI SOSIAL DI BAWAH KERANGKA KERJA PERADILAN PIDANA BARU INDONESIA

Mashendra

doi:10.56301/csj.v8i2.2033

Mashendra Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Buton, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i2.2033

Keywords: online protitution, effectiveness of law enforcement, electronic transactions

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the institutionalization of restorative justice in the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) and identify obstacles to its implementation in the criminal justice system. The method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach through legislative, conceptual, and comparative analysis. Data was obtained from primary and secondary legal materials, while the analysis technique was carried out through doctrinal analysis and comparison with restorative practices in Europe and China. The results of the study show that although restorative justice has been recognized normatively, its implementation is still uneven among law enforcement agencies. The police tend to be more prepared than the prosecutor's office and the courts, which are constrained by a lack of human resources, training, and procedural guidelines. The lack of a trauma-informed and gender-responsive approach also limits victim participation. The study emphasizes the need for codification of restorative procedures, improved inter-agency coordination, and strengthening of community-based mechanisms to support effective implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

April, K., Schrader, S. W., Walker, T. E., Francis, R. M., Glynn, H., & Gordon, D. M. (2023). Conceptualizing juvenile justice reform: Integrating the public health, social ecological, and restorative justice models. Children and Youth Services Review, 148, Article 106887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106887

Arief, B. N. (2018). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Braithwaite, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Persia to China: The Silk Road of restorative justice I. Asian Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 23–38.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797

Dong, K., Ren, X., Sun, R., & Zhao, J. (2023). Is renewable energy technology innovation a tool for restorative justice? Energy Policy, 183, 113093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113093

Droubi, S., Heffron, R. J., & McCauley, D. (2022). A critical review of energy democracy: A failure to deliver justice? Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102444

Fauzi, A., Yulia, R., Fathurokhman, F., & Ramadhan, M. I. (2023). Interpreting the material requirements of recidivism: Realizing restorative justice in the police force. Kosmik Hukum, 23(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v23i3.17521

Hazrati, M., & Heffron, R. J. (2021). Conceptualising restorative justice in the energy transition: Changing the perspectives of fossil fuels. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102115

Malau, P. (2023). Tinjauan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru 2023. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2815

Marder, I. D. (2022). Mapping restorative justice and restorative practices in criminal justice in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 70, 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100544

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

McCarthy, J. F., Dhiaulhaq, A., Afiff, S., & Robinson, K. (2022). Land reform rationalities and their governance effects in Indonesia: Provoking land politics or addressing adverse formalisation? Geoforum, 132, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.04.008

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Nadeem, M. (2021). Restorative justice as a corporate governance paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04561-x

Sharpless, N. E., Kershaw, T., & Willie, T. C. (2022). (Artikel tentang restorative justice dan intimate partner violence—dirujuk di draf). SSM – Mental Health, 2, 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100085

Soekanto, S. (2012). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI-Press.

Soekanto, S. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Willis, R. (2020). “Let’s talk about it”: Why social class matters to restorative justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 20(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818804307

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zhang, Y., & Xia, Y. (2021). Restorative justice and probation decisions: An analysis of intentional assault cases in China. Justice Quarterly, 38(7), 1471–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1950814

Zhou, Z., & Wong, W.-C. (2022). Three- and five-year-olds’ restorative intervention in moral transgressions: Effects of apology and emotion regulation. Cognitive Development, 62, 101163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101163