PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KRIMINALISASI BAGI PROFESI KURATOR DAN PENGURUS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU
Abstract
A curator who has many duties and authorities in carrying out his duties during the bankruptcy process will certainly encounter many problems or obstacles that must be overcome, however, even though the duties and authorities granted by the Law are quite broad, in practice, not a few curators and administrators experience obstacles in carrying out their duties and authorities. Almost recently it was also known that the curator had been sued in court by the bankrupt debtor where the bankrupt debtor thought what the curator had done was wrong and was considered to have stolen or embezzled the bankrupt debtor's assets, in this case what often happens is that there is no protection for the curator in carrying out his duties. The type of research used in this writing is normative legal research. With the existence of reports that seem forced and also fabricated, until now it can still be accepted by the police so that it seems as if the curator is a suspect who committed embezzlement because he made a sale without the agreement of the debtor, even though this is a series of stages in bankruptcy. So in this case it is known that this criminalization may actually be due to a lack of understanding by law enforcement in carrying out their duties. Therefore, legal protection for curators in carrying out their duties is necessary to prevent further criminalization of curators and administrators in Indonesia. The Curator and Administrator Profession Law will establish competency standards, national licenses, codes of ethics, and independent oversight mechanisms. This law should also provide limited immunity for curators and administrators who have worked according to procedures and in good faith. This protection is crucial so they can make swift decisions without the fear of criminalization.
Downloads
References
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2018). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Declercq, P. J. M. (2002). Netherlands insolvency law, the Netherlands Bankruptcy Act and the most important legal concept. T.M.C. Asser Press.
Harahap, Y. (2011). Hukum kepailitan. Sinar Grafika.
Herlina, H., Abbas, I., & Risma, A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban perdata kurator dalam proses kepailitan. Jurnal IUS, 10(1), 76–89. https://jurnal.ius.ac.id/index.php/iushukum/article/view/423
Hermansyah. (2007). Hukum perbankan nasional Indonesia. Prenada Mulia.
Hukumonline. (2025, 5 November). Kriminalisasi kurator langkah mundur hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kriminalisasi-kurator-langkah-mundur-hukum-kepailitan-di-indonesia-lt53686a2becde7/
Hukumonline. (2025, 5 November). Kriminalisasi kurator, UU kepailitan tak bisa disalahkan. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kriminalisasi-kurator--uu-kepailitan-tak-bisa-disalahkan-lt57b58a508208d/
Kartoningrat, Marzuki, & Shubhan. (2021). Prinsip independensi dan pertanggung jawaban kurator dalam pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit. Jurnal RechtIdee, 16(1).
Kristiani, L. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap kurator dalam menjalankan tugas demi kepentingan harta pailit. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, 22(1).
Loqman, L. (2004). Aspek pidana dalam hukum kepailitan. Dalam E. Yuhassarie (Ed.), Prosiding: Rangkaian lokakarya terbatas masalah-masalah kepailitan dan wawasan hukum bisnis lainnya. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum.
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mertokusumo, S. (1986). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.
Permata, N. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap kurator dalam perspektif kepastian hukum. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 10(1).
Sinaga, A., & Manurung, R. S. (2024). Analisis hukum perlindungan kurator dalam penyelesaian kepailitan berdasarkan nilai keadilan. Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 11(1), 1–15.
Sriwidodo, J., & Tumanggor, M. S. (2024). Kajian perkembangan hukum kepailitan dan PKPU di Indonesia. Kepel Press.
Subekti. (2008). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Intermasa.
Syahputra, P. M., Mahmudah, S., & Rahmanda, B. (2024). Akibat kriminalisasi kurator terhadap pengurusan dan pemberesan harta debitor pailit menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU [Skripsi/Tesis, Universitas Diponegoro].
Usman, K. D., & Umar, R. (2025). Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana oleh kurator dalam independensinya melakukan pengurusan harta debitor pada proses PKPU dan pailit. Fortiori Law Journal, 5(1), 53–75. https://jurnal.ucy.ac.id/index.php/flj/article/view/2797
Widjajati, E. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap kurator dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Reformasi Hukum, 22(1).
Copyright (c) 2025 Hendra Apriyanto, Mona Wulandari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




