Collegium Studiosum Journal

IMPLIKASI HUKUM ATAS PENGGUNAAN TENAGA KERJA ASING DALAM TINJAUAN HUKUM KEIMIGRASIAN

Jay Joshua Kondorura, Muhammad Arief Hamdi, Muhammad Alvi Syahrin — Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:34:12 +0700

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara komprehensif peranan Hukum Keimigrasian dalam menyesuaikan keberadaan Tenaga Kerja Asing, serta menganalisis implikasi hukum yang dihadapi oleh Tenaga Kerja Asing sebagai akibat dari penerapan kebijakan dan peraturan Keimigrasian. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan metode analisis kualitatif melalui studi literatur. Temuan penelitian ini menyoroti peran Hukum Keimigrasian dalam mengatur keberadaan Tenaga Kerja Asing, yang mencakup pemberian Visa dan Izin Tinggal, keberadaan penjamin, pengawasan terhadap kegiatan Tenaga Kerja Asing, hingga tindakan hukum apabila terjadi pelanggaran oleh Tenaga Kerja Asing. Tenaga Kerja Asing juga memiliki kewajiban hukum seperti masuk dan keluar melalui Tempat Pemeriksaan Imigrasi resmi, memiliki dokumen keimigrasian yang sah dan masih berlaku, memberikan informasi kepada pejabat imigrasi, bekerja sesuai dengan izin tinggal yang dimiliki, serta mematuhi ketentuan hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia.

Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:35:04 +0700

Tinjauan Penerapan UUK-PKPU Terhadap Hak Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Melaksanakan Eksekusi Agunan

Biner Sihotang, Mesa Indra Naiborhu — Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:35:48 +0700

The Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Law (UUK-PKPU) provides space for debtors to postpone debt payments and restructure their obligations. However, the existence of a 90-day stay provision in the PKPU process has caused serious problems with the rights of creditors holding mortgage rights, especially in efforts to carry out collateral execution. This study aims to analyze the application of the provision in the context of legal protection of creditors, review its compatibility with the principles of legal certainty and justice, and criticize the potential for legal smuggling that may occur in practice. Through a normative approach and literature study, including linking the conflict of norms between UUK-PKPU and the Mortgage Rights Law (UUHT), this article shows that the dominance of the lex posterior derogat legi priori principle in this context often ignores substantive justice for creditors. The results of this study emphasize the need for legal reform of the PKPU stay period and the balancing of protection between debtors and creditors in the process of postponing debt payment obligations. These findings reinforce the urgency of regulatory reorganization to prevent irregularities in the implementation of bankruptcy law in Indonesia.

Kebijakan Pemidanaan Korporasi Dalam RUU KUHP: Analisis Normatif Dan Kesiapan Praktis Aparat Penegak Hukum

Dewi Nawang Bulan, Nandang Sambas — Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:36:18 +0700

This article analyzes corporate criminal liability policy as stipulated in the Draft of the Indonesian Criminal Code (RUU KUHP). The study focuses on two essential dimensions: the normative construction of corporate criminal responsibility and the practical readiness of law enforcement agencies to implement this policy. Employing a normative legal method with conceptual and comparative approaches, this research finds that despite the progressive legal framework in the RUU KUHP, the institutional and technical readiness of legal practitioners remains limited. Strengthening institutional capacity and drafting comprehensive technical guidelines are crucial to ensure the effective enforcement of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia.

ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBERHENTIAN KEPALA DESA YANG MENJADI TERPIDANA KASUS KORUPSI DI KABUPATEN CILACAP

Galang Bakti Persada, Gamalel Rifqi Samhudi — Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:28:50 +0700

The dismissal of the village head is an important aspect in the running of the village government. Village heads are dismissed for violating the provisions stipulated in the law, one of which is corruption. The dismissal mechanism is often not aligned between the rules and practices in the field. Therefore, this study discusses the mechanism for dismissing village heads who are caught in corruption cases. This study aims to analyze the suitability of the mechanism for dismissing village heads with applicable legal provisions and evaluate its application in practice. The method used is an empirical juridical approach, which examines relevant laws and regulations and combines them with the results of field observations and interviews. The object of this research is the process of dismissal of the Panisihan Village Head, who was permanently dismissed in 2021 before a court decision with permanent legal force in 2023. The results show that administratively, the dismissal process has followed formal procedures through the authorized institution. However, juridically, the permanent dismissal raises issues in the application of the principle of legal certainty because there was no legal basis in the form of a court decision when the dismissal was made. This study concludes that although the government's steps are considered quick in maintaining the stability of the village government, they have not fully fulfilled the requirements of the legal certainty principle.

Putusan Penjatuhan Pidana Seumur Hidup Dalam Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Dengan Terdakwa Ferdy Sambo Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Keadilan

Aulia Adelia Wulandari, Rahtami Susanti — Mon, 30 Jun 2025 22:22:59 +0700

The premeditated murder case involving the defendant Ferdy Sambo has attracted attention due to its involvement of law enforcement officers and resulting in a life imprisonment sentence. This research aims to analyze the ruling from the perspective of justice theory, particularly according to Aristotelian views. The method used is a juridical-normative approach to the judge's ruling and legal considerations. The findings indicate that the decision reflects retributive justice leaning towards a more rehabilitative and humane approach. However, in distributive and corrective justice, debates arise regarding the proportionality of the punishment, the defendant's position as a former high-ranking police officer, and public expectations of justice. This ruling is legally valid, yet it leaves unresolved moral and ethical questions in its implementation.

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: SAAT HUKUM MENDENGARKAN KORBAN

T. Banjarnahor — Wed, 02 Jul 2025 18:08:40 +0700

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Pembela Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia

Verawati BR Tompul — Wed, 02 Jul 2025 18:10:27 +0700

Women human rights defenders are agents of change, defending the interests of citizens and groups who often have no access to justice. When women human rights defenders assist a community or group, they are highly vulnerable to threats, including sexual harassment, rape threats, death threats, frequent reporting to the police by the other party, cyber attacks, physical, psychological and verbal abuse, defamation, attacks on family and murder. The vulnerability experienced by PPHAMs is a form of structural violence rooted in a patriarchal legal and social system. The state has a duty to protect PPHAM, i.e. to create a safe and comfortable environment for them. To protect PPHAM from criminalisation. The legal protection of PPHAM must be a priority for the state and civil society to ensure a safe and just space.

Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli Tanah Melalui Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah

Elvan Agustin, Fahmi, Irawan Harahap — Thu, 03 Jul 2025 16:51:03 +0700

Pembatalan akta jual beli tanah melalui putusan pengadilan memiliki implikasi yang kompleks. Tidak hanya mengubah status hukum kepemilikan tanah, tetapi juga berpengaruh terhadap hak-hak perdata para pihak, tanggung jawab hukum PPAT, serta pengaturan administratif di BPN. Oleh sebab itu, proses pembatalan harus dilakukan secara hati-hati dan berdasarkan alat bukti yang kuat, agar tidak menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum baru dalam masyarakat. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beriktikad Baik bahwa setiap transaksi jual beli tanah dilakukan dengan mematuhi ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Pembeli yang beritikad baik, yaitu yang membeli tanah dengan itikad jujur dan tanpa mengetahui adanya cacat hukum pada transaksi tersebut, berhak untuk mendapatkan perlindungan hukum. Jika terjadi pembatalan akta jual beli tanah melalui putusan pengadilan negeri, pembeli beritikad baik harus dilindungi dengan pemberian ganti rugi atau pengembalian uang, untuk memastikan hak-hak mereka tidak terabaikan. Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli Tanah Melalui Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah mempengaruhi status kepemilikan tanah yang bersangkutan. Pembatalan tersebut menyebabkan hak atas tanah kembali kepada penjual, dan pembeli tidak dapat lagi mengklaim hak kepemilikan atas tanah tersebut. Dalam hal ini, pengembalian uang atau kompensasi menjadi langkah penting untuk memulihkan keadaan pembeli beritikad baik. Proses administrasi pertanahan juga akan mengalami pembaruan untuk mencatat status tanah sesuai dengan keputusan pengadilan.

Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian Diwilayah Hukum Polres Dumai

Try Krisna Monarchi, Yetti, Yeni Triana — Thu, 03 Jul 2025 16:52:58 +0700

INKONSISTENSI HUKUM PENGATURAN PENGEMBALIAN UANG HASIL KORUPSI DARI PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM

Rahmat Tul Qadri, Bagio Kadaryanto, Yelia Nathassa Winstar — Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:09:36 +0700

From the perspective of legal certainty, inconsistency in the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds can create uncertainty in the implementation of the law and the legal process in general. Inconsistency or inconsistency between these three regulations can create confusion in the legal process related to the return of corruption proceeds. Legal certainty is an important principle in the legal system that demands consistency and clarity in the applicable regulations. Therefore, there needs to be an effort to formulate more consistent and comprehensive regulations regarding the return of corruption proceeds to ensure better legal certainty. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal inconsistency of the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds from the perspective of legal certainty and to analyze the legal consequences of the inconsistency of the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds from the perspective of legal certainty. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Inconsistency of the Law on the Return of Corruption Proceeds from the Perspective of Legal Certainty is that the Indonesian legal system is weak in guaranteeing legal certainty. Multi-interpretable legal provisions, the absence of standard asset return mechanisms, and inconsistent judicial practices create confusion in implementation. This makes it difficult for perpetrators, law enforcement officers, and the public to obtain clarity on the legal consequences of the return of corruption proceeds. Legal certainty that should guarantee justice and protection of the rights of the state and society has become unclear due to differences in interpretation and inconsistency between legal institutions. Legal Consequences of Inconsistency in the Law on the Refund of Corruption Proceeds From the Perspective of Legal Certainty that it causes various serious legal consequences, both normatively and practically. From the perspective of legal certainty, this creates ambiguity in the implementation of norms, thus confusing law enforcement officers and creating injustice. From the perspective of legal certainty, this irregularity raises doubts about the credibility of the legal system itself. Perpetrators of corruption crimes can take advantage of legal loopholes to avoid returning state losses, which ultimately harms society and violates the principle of justice. This also has the potential to reduce the deterrent effect of criminal law on corruption because sanctions are not implemented firmly and consistently. The suggestion is that it is necessary to harmonize laws and regulations, especially the revision of the Corruption Law and the Criminal Procedure Code in order to have clear and operational rules regarding the return of corruption proceeds.

ANALISIS PUTUSAN PTUN NO. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT: DISKREPANSI ANTARA LEGALITAS FORMAL DAN KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF

TImbo Mangaranap Sirait, Khalimi, Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Hatta — Thu, 03 Jul 2025 18:27:25 +0700

Semakin bertambahnya jumlah penduduk, tanah dari sudut ekonomi sangat berfungsi baik bagi masyarakat maupun negara sehingga seringkali terjadi sengketa atas tanah karena pejabat tata usaha negara memiliki kewenangan administratif sebagaimana dalam Putusan PTUN No. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode Yuridis Normatif melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisa kasus, dengan rumusan masalah (1) Bagaimana bentuk diskrepansi antara legalitas formal dan keadilan substantif dalam Putusan PTUN No. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT?, (2) Bagaimana analisis teori hukum responsif menjelaskan ketidaksesuaian antara tindakan administratif dengan prinsip keadilan hukum?, dan disimpulkan bahwa, Pertama, bentuk diskrepansi antara legalitas formal dan keadilan substantif dalam Putusan PTUN No. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT, di mana suatu putusan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht) sehingga tidak dapat diganggu gugat secara hukum. Namun dalam praktiknya diabaikan, dan justru Putusan yang lain menjadi dasar administratif penerbitan sertifikat. Kedua, dalam hal dianalisis teori hukum responsif menjelaskan ketidaksesuaian antara tindakan administratif dengan prinsip keadilan hukum dalam perkara tersebut, ditemukan hal mana dalam penegakkan hukum administrasi di Indonesia konsep hukum responsif akan jauh lebih relevan untuk diterapkan.

TINJAUAN IMPLEMENTASI DISPENSASI PERKAWINAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Kab.Mlg Ditinjau Berdasarkan UU No. 16 Th. 2019)

Sudibyo Aji Narendra Buwana, Nadya Damanik, Muhammad Habib — Fri, 04 Jul 2025 11:33:57 +0700