THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS RESULTS OF THE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE

  • Qodriyah Isniyati Master of Laws Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Danang Wahyu M Master of Laws Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Mukti Fajar ND Master of Laws Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Distributive Justice, Economic Justice, Employees Cooperative

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the distribution of the Surplus of Business Results (SHU) of the Employees Cooperative of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta in light of the principle of justice. Based on Law Number 25 of 1992 on Cooperatives, Article 45 stipulates that the surplus of business results, after the allocation of reserve funds, shall be distributed to members in proportion to the business services conducted by each member with the cooperative, and shall also be allocated for cooperative education and other cooperative needs in accordance with the decisions of the members meeting. In practice, SHU distribution is generally carried out during the annual members meeting, where members with larger loan amounts tend to receive a greater share of SHU than members with equivalent savings. The principle of justice in SHU distribution is thus oriented toward members who contribute the most significant reserve funds. This research employs a juridical method with a normative approach. The novelty of this study lies in its examination of the application of the principle of justice in the distribution of SHU within the Employees' Cooperative of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. The findings indicate that SHU distribution prioritizes members with the largest loans, resulting in greater SHU benefits than those from savings. However, this practice raises concerns about members' understanding of justice, as many perceive fair distribution as equal allocation among members. Therefore, cooperative management should be more proactive in disseminating cooperative literacy to ensure that members do not perceive the differences in SHU allocation as "unfair". Aristotle conceptualized justice as a balance between numerical equality and proportional equality, namely granting rights in accordance with capacity and merit, which aligns with the application of SHU distribution in the Employees' Cooperative of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifudin, A. (2018). Monopoli Bisnis Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Di Tinjau Dari Undang Undang No. 25 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perkoperasian. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 1(1), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i1.2235

Amrianto, A. D. (2023). PEMULIHAN HAK KORBAN SALAH TANGKAP BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 18(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v18i1.6419

Dewanti, L. P. mela, & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr), Good Corporate Governance (Gcg), Dan Budaya Tri Hita Karana Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Di Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 4(2), 235–235. https://doi.org/10.38043/jiab.v4i2.2307

Haqiqi, F., Alkausar, R. N., Yusmalina, Y., & Laily, A. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Simpanan Anggota dan Pinjaman Anggota terhadap Perolehan Sisa Hasil Usaha (Studi Kasus pada Ksp Kredit Union Jembatan Kasih Tanjung Balai Karimun Periode Tahun 2016-2018). Jurnal Cafetaria, 1(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.2020/akuntansi.v1i2.147

Hasanuddin, M., & Hermina, N. (2024). The Effect of Leadership Style and Organizational Culture in Determining the Employee Performance of Koperasi Syariah During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the South Cimahi Region. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v13i2.1270

Jasmine, M., Otich, D., Setiawan, R. W., & Mufid, M. (2025). Konsep Dan Tipe Keadilan Dalam Pemikiran Aristoteles. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(01). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/945

Junaidi, A., Setiawan, D., & Akbar, R. (2021a). PENGELOLAAN DAN PEMBAGIAN SISA HASIL USAHA (SHU) KOPERASI JASA BERKAH BERSAMA SYARIâ€TMAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2012. JURNAL MANAJEMEN MODAL INSANI DAN BISNIS (JMMIB), 2(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.61567/jmmib.v2i2.78

Junaidi, A., Setiawan, D., & Akbar, R. (2021b). Pengelolaan Dan Pembagian Sisa Hasil Usaha (Shu) Koperasi Jasa Berkah Bersama Syari’ah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2012. Jurnal Manajemen Modal Insani Dan Bisnis (JMMIB), 2(2), 189–209.

Kalsum, U., Permana, A., Hidayat, R., Kosim, B., Muslimin, A., & Fitria, P. (2025). ANALISIS PERAN VOLUME USAHA DAN JUMLAH ANGGOTA DALAM MENENTUKAN PEROLEHAN SHU KOPERASI. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 5(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15487756

Mbulu, Y., Kellen, P. B., Ndoen, L. M., & Marselinus, B. (2019). PENGARUH JUMLAH SIMPANAN DAN JUMLAH PINJAMAN ANGGOTA TERHADAP SISA HASIL USAHA PADA KOPERASI KREDIT HANDAYANI BAJAWA. JURNAL AKUNTANSI : TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS, 7(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.35508/jak.v7i2.1706

Menteri Koperasi dan UMKM RI. (2023). Permenkop dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah RINomor 8 Tahun 2023 tentang Usaha Simpan Pinjam oleh Koperasi. Peraturan Menteri Koperasi Dan Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2023, 151(464), 10–17.

Muksalmina, M., Gaja, E. G., Chyntia, E., & Muammar, M. (2025). Model Penguatan Ekonomi Sekitar PT Pupuk Iskandar Muda Melalui Program Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Sesuai dengan Ketentuan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v13i1.21898

Nurbaiti, I., & Perkasa, R. D. (2023). Pengaruh Modal Sendiri, Modal Pinjaman, Dan Volume Usaha Terhadap Selisih Hasil Usaha (SHU) Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 3440–3450.

PENGARUH JUMLAH ANGGOTA, MODAL LUAR, DAN TOTAL ASSET TERHADAP SISA HASIL USAHA (Studi Empiris pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam di Kota Tasikmalaya tahun 2016) | Ekspektra: Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen. (n.d.). Retrieved January 17, 2026, from https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/manajemen/article/view/339

Pratam, M. R. S. (2015). UPAYA PENGURUS KOPERASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PARTISIPASI ANGGOTA DI KOPERASI WANITA HARUM MELATI KARANG PILANG SURABAYA. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v3n2.p%2525p

Setiana, F. A. (2024). PERKEMBANGAN, TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG KOPERASI DI INDONESIA DALAM MENGHADAPI ERA 4.0. Jurnal Tanbih, 1(1), 46–59.

Sitohang, G. S., Situmorang, F., Marbun, J., & Matondang, K. A. (2025). Peran Prinsip Tanggung Renteng dalam Memperkuat Fondasi Solidaritas Anggota Koperasi di Indonesia. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 3591–3596. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1055

Sobarna, N., & Nurpadi, D. (2025). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Sharia Cooperatives in Implementing Cooperative Social Functions. J-Coop : Journal of Cooperative, 1(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.32670/jc.v1i1.4

Tahir, M., Wahid, S. H., & Abunawas. (2021). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGURUS CREDIT UNION DALAM RAPAT ANGGOTA TAHUNAN. Jurnal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 3(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ahkam.v3i1.549

Winarko, S. P. (2014). PENGARUH MODAL SENDIRI, JUMLAH ANGGOTA DAN ASET TERHADAP SISA HASIL USAHA PADA KOPERASI DI KOTA KEDIRI. Nusantara of Research : Jurnal Hasil-hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29407/nor.v1i2.52

Yuliati, M., Mardiana, & Indrawati, A. (2021). Analisis Perhitungan Pembagian Sisa Hasil Usaha (SHU) Anggota Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sentosa Samarinda Periode 2016-2017. Ekonomia, 10(2), 216–222.

Zulkarnain, I. (2018). TEORI KEADILAN: “PENGARUH PEMIKIRAN ETIKA ARISTOTELES KEPADA SISTEM ETIKA IBN MISKAWAIH.” Jurnal MADANI: Ilmu Pengetahuan, Teknologi, Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.33753/madani.v1i1.8

Published
2026-01-22
How to Cite
Qodriyah Isniyati, M, D. W., & ND, M. F. (2026). THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS RESULTS OF THE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE. Awang Long Law Review, 8(2), 623-631. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i2.2042