RELEVANSI KEPENTINGAN ALAT-ALAT BUKTI DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN HUKUM PERDATA

  • Khansa Laily Az Zahra Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Moh Fadwa Mufid Al Amjad Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Syafa Nabya Maulidian Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)
  • Septiani Silvia Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Fadilla Azfa Asyifa Universitas Negeri Semarang
Keywords: Evidence, Relevance, Civil Law, Theory of Proof

Abstract

This paper discusses the important role of evidence in the civil law evidentiary process. Evidence allows parties to prove or disprove their claims in court. In this process, evidentiary tools such as written evidence, testimonies, depositions, admissions, and oaths become a solid foundation to build a legal case and help the court make a fair decision. The concept and classification of evidence, as well as their strength and hierarchy, become important factors in determining the success of a case in court. The method used is research that belongs to the type of analytical research. In the process, we analyze the relevance of evidence in the context of the case under study. In civil law settlements, the relevance of evidence is an essential aspect. Evidence plays a crucial role in ensuring justice and legal certainty. The classification of evidence, such as primary, secondary, and physical evidence, is important in assessing its probative force. Various theories of evidence, ranging from those that are bound by law to those that give judges freedom, offer diverse approaches in assessing evidence. Although they vary, the ultimate goal is to reach a fair verdict based on the available facts. By understanding and applying the concepts, strengths, hierarchies, and theories of evidence appropriately, the civil law settlement process can be carried out effectively, ensuring that the resulting decision is fair and in accordance with applicable legal principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brahmana, H.S. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, diakses dari https://www.pnlhoksukon.go.id/media/files/20170417150853209334910258f4781588e77_20170419145829_Teori%2Bdan%2BHukum%2BPembuktian.pdf

BbbDaud. (2022). PERANAN SUMPAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DI DALAM PROSES PERDATA. Vol. 5 No. 1. 19-20. 10.33395/juripol.v5i1.11303

Fernando Kobis. (2017). KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN SURAT MENURUT HUKUM ACARA PERDATA. Vol.VI No. 5. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/16675

Juanda, Enju. (2016). KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PERDATA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA. 31-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409

Krisnawati, Ari. (2015). PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERDATA. Diktat Kuloiah, Universtas Udayana. https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_pendidikan_dir/ac46262d59f9ea4f78eac3d6f3841958.pdf

Laike, R, j. (2024). ALAT BUKTI HAK ATAS TANAH SUKU MODOLE DALAM HUBUNGAN HUKUM KONKRET. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, 7(3), 396-412. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3968

Momuat, O, M. (2014). Alat Bukti Tulisan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 2(1), 134-143. https://bhl-jurnal.or.id/index.php/bhl/article/view/200

Pandiangan, Hendri Jayadi. (2017). PERBEDAAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DAN PERDATA. Jurnal Hukum tô-râ. Volume 3 No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33541/tora.v3i2.1154

Safira, Martha Eri. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata. CV. Nata Karya

Seknun, Abul Hasan. (2021). SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN. Justitia. Vol. VIII, No.15. https://jurnal.ummu.ac.id/index.php/justisia/article/view/1290

Saepullah, Asep. (2018). Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan. Vol. 3, No. 1.145. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/mahkamah/article/view/2748

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. (2015). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Perpustakaan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan.

Subekti. (2017). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Supada, Bargawa. (2008). PENILAIAN HAKIM TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI AKTA DIBAWAH TANGAN DALAM PROSES PEMERIKSAAN SENGKETA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SURAKARTA. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/874

Ussu, Darliyanti. (2014). HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERKARA PERDATA. Lex Privatum. Vol.II, No. 1. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3967

Yahya Harahap. (2015). Hukum Acara Perdata. Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, Cetakan Ke 15.

Published
2024-06-08
How to Cite
Laily Az Zahra, K., Mufid Al Amjad, M. F., Nabya Maulidian, S., Silvia, S., & Azfa Asyifa, F. (2024). RELEVANSI KEPENTINGAN ALAT-ALAT BUKTI DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN HUKUM PERDATA. The Juris, 8(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1185