ANALISIS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM
Abstract
This research is legal research with an analytical study of the Unlawful Acts of the General Election Commission (Onrechtmatige Overheisdaad) in Court Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst. The purpose of this study is to determine the absolute competence of the District Court to try the unlawful acts of the General Election Commission and to analyze the basis for the judge's considerations in granting the Prima party's lawsuit. The method used in this study is normative legal research. This study found that the absolute competence of the Court to try the Unlawful Acts committed by the KPU should be the domain of the State Administrative Court, not the State Court, so that in the context of the KPU vs. Prima Party case there was an error in applying the law. In the considerations of the Central Jakarta District Court Judge who Granted the Application for the Prima Party's Unlawful Acts Lawsuit carried out by the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in the District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst the panel of judges did not clearly explain what and how the considerations of the decision stating that the District Court has the authority to try the lawsuit filed by the PRIMA Party in issuing an interim decision.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Basarah, MPR: Putusan PN Jakpus untuk Menunda Pemilu Bertentangan dengan UUD 45, https://sinpo.id/detail/47347/mpr-putusan-pn-jakpus-untuk-menunda-pemilu-bertentangan-dengan-uud-45. Diakses 29 Oktober 2024.
Ani Purwati, (2020) Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori dan Praktek, Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing.
Amiruddin & Zainal Asikin, (2016) Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti Rugi Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 974-985.
Baried, Muhammad Arifadi Nugroho dan Rizky Ramadhan. “Ketepatan Penerapan Kompetensi Absolut Terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa Oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan …,” 2023, 154–70. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/47505%0Ahttps://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/47505/19410072.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
E. Fernando M. Manullang, Peradilan Etika Pemilu: Really? Seriously? https://law.ui.ac.id/peradilan-etika-pemilu-really-seriously-oleh-dr-e-fernando-m-manullang/, diakses 30 Oktober 2024.
Nugroho, M. A. (2023). Ketepatan Penerapan Kompetensi Absolut terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor: 757/pdt. g/2022/PN. JKT PST) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).
Nababan, Sirait, & Manalu, (2023). Perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh penguasa di era digital. Yustisi, 10(1), 185-195.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2017) Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst,” 2022.
Qamar, Nurul, Muhammad Syarif, Dachran S Busthami, M Kamal Hidjaz, Aan Aswari, Hardianto Djanggih, and Farah Syah Rezah. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods). CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2017.
Ridwan, H. R. (2003). Pertanggungjawaban Publik Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 10(22), 27-38.
Sukmajati, A., Mahardhika, R. K., Wiratama, K. S., & Witardi, R. J. (2023). Dinamika Intrepetasi dan Penanganan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(13), 96-104.
Copyright (c) 2024 Anwar Sadat, Razikin, Nandio Rafael Aryo Putra, Syamsul Mawahid, Sugito, Wiliana Dian Novita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
