TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PELAKU USAHA ATAS PRODUK CACAT TERSEMBUNYI

  • Jetmiko Setiawan Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Yetti Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Indra Afrita Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Keywords: Violence Responsibility, Business Actors, Hidden Defective Products

Abstract

Business actors, as parties with stronger bargaining positions, ethically have the obligation to ensure that the products they manufacture and distribute are safe for use. Moral responsibility should drive business actors to actively ensure product quality and refrain from concealing defects or hidden faults that may harm consumers. Therefore, it is important to examine how the Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal responsibilities of business actors for hidden defective products, and how moral responsibility can strengthen their commitment to upholding consumer rights. This study employs normative legal research methods. Based on the findings, the legal responsibility of business actors for hidden defective products, as governed by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, serves as a concrete form of consumer rights protection. A hidden defective product is one that appears normal at the time of purchase but contains a defect that is not immediately visible and only causes damage or harm after use. The Consumer Protection Law requires business actors to be fully responsible for the products they produce or trade, including their quality, safety, and the accuracy of the information provided to consumers. Article 19 of Law No. 8 of 1999 stipulates that business actors must provide compensation for damages caused by defective products, including physical harm, contamination, or financial losses. This form of liability is strict, meaning that even if the business actor was unaware of the defect, they are still held accountable for introducing a defective product into the market. This obligation reflects the principle of due diligence in business and reinforces protection for consumers, who are generally in a weaker position in legal and commercial relationships. The legal consequences faced by business actors who neglect or evade this responsibility are also regulated by the Consumer Protection Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, R., Nieuwenhuis, H., et al. (2012). Hukum perikatan (Law of obligation). Jakarta: Pustaka Larasan.

Ahmad Sopian Sauri, Yuniar Rahmatiar, & Muhamad Abas. (2023). ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA MEMPRODUKSI OBAT SIRUP CAIR YANG MENIMBULKAN GAGAL GINJAL AKUT PADA ANAK. The Juris, 7(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i1.833

Kusyanto. (2024). TINDAK PIDANA TIDAK MENGGUNAKAN LABEL BERBAHASA INDONESIA PADA BARANG YANG DIPERDAGANGKAN DI DALAM NEGERI OLEH PELAKU USAHA. The Juris, 8(1), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1253

Makarim, E. (2003). Pengantar hukum telematika. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FH UI & Rajawali Pers.

Miru, A. (2004). Prinsip-prinsip perlindungan bagi konsumen di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Miru, A. (2011). Prinsip-prinsip perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mohd. Yusuf D.M., Dedy Siswanto, & Alam Karta. (2022). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN YANG DIRUGIKAN OLEH PELAKU USAHA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN. The Juris, 6(1), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i1.671

Patrik, P. (1994). Dasar-dasar hukum perikatan (Perikatan yang lahir dari perjanjian dan dari undang-undang). Bandung: PT Maju Mundur.

Siahaan, N. H. T. (2005). Hukum konsumen: Perlindungan konsumen dan tanggung jawab produk. Jakarta: Panta Rei.

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 22.

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Setiawan, J., Yetti, & Afrita, I. (2025). TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PELAKU USAHA ATAS PRODUK CACAT TERSEMBUNYI. The Juris, 9(1), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v9i1.1676