TINJAUAN HUKUM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA JUDI ONLINE

  • Deva Yurita Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Sukmareni Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Yenni Fitri Z Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Keywords: legal Review, Crime, Online Gambling

Abstract

This study analyzes the considerations by judges in imposing criminal decisions on perpetrators of online gambling crimes in Decision Number 111/Pid.B/2022/Pn Bkt. This research uses normative law research. Data analysis is used by interpreting the data and presenting it in sentences to answer problems in subsequent chapters. The results of this study are: 1) The panel of judges in deciding the considerations in the decision considers more juridical considerations that look at the defendant's background and life further. The judge should be able to give a more severe deterrent effect to the defendant, remembering the defendant is not just a number taker on gambling games online but acting as a bookie. 2) In imposing a criminal verdict, the public prosecutor and the Panel of Judges should also use the law on electronic transactions and information, considering that the defendant's case is online gambling, accessed using the network.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami Chazawi, (2005), Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

goleman, daniel; boyatzis, Richard; Mckee, Annie, ‘Perjudian’, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53.9 (2019), 1689–99.

Hukum, Fakultas, and Universitas Muslim Nusantara, ‘Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Kasus Basic Judge Consideration in Deciding the Case of Gambling Cases’, 7.7 (2017), 127–35

Ii,BAB,‘Http://Www.Pengertianartidefinisi.Com/2015/10/Pengertian-Hukum-Yuridis Http://Repository. Dharmawangsa.Ac.Id/372/8/BAB%20II_15110024.Pdf’, 11–30

Isnaini, Enik, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Perjudian Online Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Independent, 5.1 (2017), 23 <https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v5i1.61>

J. Remellink, (2014), Pengantar Hukum Pidana Materiil 1, Yogyakarta: Sungging.

Kartini Kartono, (2005), Patologi Sosial Jilid I, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana)

Panjaitan, Indra Prasetya, ‘PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU YANG TANPA HAK MEMBUAT DAPAT DIAKSES INFORMASI DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK YANG MEMILIKI MUATAN PERJUDIAN (STUDI PUTUSAN No.794/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Mdn)’, Repository UHN, 2019, 1–40

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bukittinggi Nomor 111/Pid.B/2022/Pn Bkt

Rizki, Anjas Roy, ‘Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian (Studi Putusan 36/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Kds’, Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 3.2 (2021), 6

Sudikno Mertukusomo, (2003), Mengenal Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta.

Undang-Undang No 7 Tahun 1974 Tentang Penertiban Perjudian.

Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 1981 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elekktonik

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Published
2023-12-13
How to Cite
Yurita, D., Sukmareni, & Fitri Z, Y. (2023). TINJAUAN HUKUM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA JUDI ONLINE. The Juris, 7(2), 453-463. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i2.927