ANALISIS PERTANGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KORPORASI

  • Qiaro Tamyiz Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Singaperbangsa
  • Taun Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Singaperbangsa
Keywords: Corporate responsibility, corporate responsibility doctrine, punishing

Abstract

The concept of criminal liability against corporations s a new concept criminal law. The difficulty of mposing responsibility on the corporation n committing the crime of laundering creates problems, namely when the corporation s deemed to have committed a crime of money laundering and how s the responsibility mposed. To find out this, the researcher used the juridical-normative method, with secondary data sources through a statutory approach, a legal analytical approach and a case approach and a qualitative data analysis method. The results of the study show that Law No. 8 of 2010 PPTPUU does not directly regulate when a corporation commits the crime of money laundering, so the author needs to nterpret and link the articles of money laundering with corporations as the subject of a crime. The actor acts as the directing mind by mposing on the corporation and / or corporate controlling personnel. There s no explanation for the mposition of corporate responsibility so that n order to transfer the burden of responsibility to the corporation and / or corporate control personnel, t s necessary to use the doctrine of vacarious liability theory with the theory of responsibility approach: Delegation (doctrine of delegation), dentification (doctrine of dentification) and Aggregation (doctrine of aggregation), so that corporations can be punished / held accountable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfitra. (2014). Modus Operandi Pidana Khusus di Luar KUHP. Penerbit Raih Asa Sukses.

Amrullah, A. (2018). Perkembangan Kejahatan Korporasi. Prenada Media.

Barda, N. A., & Rampai, B. (2014). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. In Prenada Media Group.

Chazawi, A. (2021). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Edisi Revisi. In Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing.

Desturi, D. (2021). TANGGUNGJAWAB KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA PT ASURANSI JIWASRAYA (PESERO)(Analisa Putusan Nomor 30/Pid. Sus/Tpk/2020/PN. Jkt. Pst). Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

Jufri, M. (2023). KONSTITUSIONALITAS CALON LEGISLATIF MANTAN NARAPIDANA KORUPSI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. Jurnal Bawaslu DKI, 8((1)), 47–68.

Nugroho, N., Sunarmi, S., Siregar, M., & Munthe, R. (2020). Analisis terhadap Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Bank Negara Indonesia. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 2((1)), 100–110.

Pitts, C. (2014). Corporate criminal liability, The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.

Prasetyo, D. R. (2016). Penyitaan dan Perampasan Aset Hasil Korupsi sebagai Upaya Pemiskinan Koruptor. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12((4)), 149–163.

Priyatno, M. dan D. (2013). Pertanggung Jawaban Korporasi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Rosikin, H. (2021). OPERASI TANGKAP TANGAN PADA PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN NILAI KEADILAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 97/Pid/Prad/2017/PN Jkt. Sel). Universitas 17 agustus 1945 Surabaya.

Sutardjo, S. A. (2014). KEADILAN HUKUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM. JAMAK: Jurnal Administrasi Manajemen Dan Kepemimpinan, 1((1)), 40–47.

Wiyono, R. (2022). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. In Sinar Grafika.

Wuarlela, B. S. (2021). Kepastian Hukum dan Budaya Korupsi di Indonesia.

Zuber, A. (2018). Strategi Anti Korupsi Melalui Pendekatan Pendidikan Formal Dan Kpk (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi). Journal of Development and Social Change, 178–190

Published
2023-12-10
How to Cite
Tamyiz, Q., & Taun. (2023). ANALISIS PERTANGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KORPORASI . The Juris, 7(2), 477-485. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i2.934