SANKSI PIDANA KEPADA ORANG TUA YANG MELALAIKAN TANGGUNG JAWAB BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NARKOTIKA DAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK

Erika Magdalena Rumahorbo

doi:10.56301/juris.v8i1.1232

Erika Magdalena Rumahorbo Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1232

Keywords: Narcotics Law, Child Protection Law, Normative Law

Abstract

This study aims to analysing the comparison between the Narcotics Law and the Child Protection Law regarding sanctions against parents who do not fulfil their obligations. This research uses Normative Legal research methods using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials, legal materials that are binding in the form of applicable legislation, and secondary legal materials, secondary legal materials are legal materials obtained from law books, legal journals, and scientific articles on law related to the application of sanctions against parents who do not fulfil their obligations in protecting their children. Data collection is carried out using literature studies by searching, exploring collecting, and analysing the necessary data. In addition, this study will invite writers and readers to critically evaluate the validity and reliability of the project or study as a whole from this research which aims to analyse the comparison between the Narcotics Law (UU Narkotika) and the Child Protection Law regarding sanctions against parents who do not fulfil their obligations. The analysis becomes a juridical consideration with a philosophical and conceptual approach. The results of the research will find a comparison between the Narcotics Law and the Child Protection Law regarding sanctions against parents who do not fulfil their obligations. This paper is different from other studies, where this research will focus on examining the comparison between the Narcotics Law and the Child Protection Law regarding the application of sanctions to parents who do not fulfil their obligations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami Chazawi. (n.d.). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Hannes Magdalena Hutagalung, A. R. F. (2023). TANGGUNGJAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN ANAK SEBAGAI KELOMPOK RENTAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Jurnal Untag, 24(2), 19. http://ejurnal.untag-smd.ac.id/index.php/dedikasi/article/viewFile/7287/6471

HANUGRAH TITI H. S. (2014). ANALISIS NORMATIF KEHARUSAN ORANG TUA MELAPORKAN ANAKNYA SEBAGAI PECANDU NARKOTIKA DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 26 AYAT (1) BUTIR a UURI NO. 23 TAHUN 2002 MENGENAI PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (Issue August) [UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA]. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/887/875

Hutahaean, B. (2013). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak. Jurnal Yudisial, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v6i1.119

Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Refika Aditama.

Muchlisin Riadi. (2022). Peran dan Tanggungjawab Orang Tua. Kajian Pustaka. https://www.kajianpustaka.com/2022/11/peran-dan-tanggung-jawab-orang-tua.html

Nurul Chomaria. (2010). Menzalimi anak tanpa sadar. PT. Aqwan Media Profetika.

Pasal 55 ayat (1) dan (2) Undang-Undang No. 35 tahun 2009. (2009). ???

Pasal 9 UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2002 MENGENAI PERLINDUNGAN ANAK, Pub. L. No. 23, 5 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092836

Purnama Sari, M. P., Komalawati, V., & Saleh, K. A. (2022). Tanggungjawab Alimentasi Anak Yang Sudah Dewasa Terhadap Orang Tua Lansia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5342

Undang - Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Mengenai Perubahan Atas Undang – Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Mengenai Perlindungan Anak, UU Perlindungan Anak 11 (2014). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/38723/uu-no-35-tahun-2014