PENERAPAN PASAL MENGUNTUNGKAN TERPIDANA

Aldi Yosep Marpaung; Muh Haryanto

doi:10.56301/juris.v8i2.1278

Aldi Yosep Marpaung Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia
Muh Haryanto Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i2.1278

Keywords: New Penal Code, Criminal Code, Amnesty

Abstract

This article discusses the benefits for convicts in the context of changes to statutory regulations which state that the convict’s actions are no longer a criminal. As stated in Article 3 paragraph (4) of the new Criminal Code. So, how can the material law like Article 3 paragraph (4) of the new Criminal Code be implemented? Based on normative research through qualitative methods and normative juridical approaches, the author will answer this question through several considerations of mechanisms as an effort taken by convicts through judicial review, cassation for legal purposes, clemency, and amnesty. Judicial review, cassation for legal purposes, and clemency will be considered as petition efforts from convicts regarding the implementation of Article 3 paragraph (4) of the new Criminal Code. Meanwhile, amnesty will be considered as an effort from the community or the government's intention in implementing Article 3 paragraph (4) of the new Penal Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fauzi, Suyogi Imam. (2021). Politik Hukum Pemberian Grasi, Amnesti dan Abolisi Sebagai Konsekuensi Logis Hak Prerogatif. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, (51)3, 621-636.

Hardianto, Marco. (2022). Perubahan Undang-Undang Oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Kacamata Pasal 1 Ayat (2) KUHP. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, (1)2, 171-181.

Haryanto, M. (2017). Hukum Acara Pidana. Salatiga: Griya Media.

Sriwidodo Joko. (2019). Kajian Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, Kepel Press, 60.

Lase, Martinus, (2021). Kriteria Penerapan Amnesti Oleh Presiden Republik Indonesia. JOM Fakultas Hukum Riau, (8)2, 12.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Panjaitan, Budi Sastra Panjaitan. (2018). Perkembangan Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Keadilan, 5(2), 122.

Prastowo, R. B. Budi. (2006). Asas Nonretroaktivitas Dalam Perubahan Perundang-Undangan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justicia, (24)2, 171-181.

Soeparman, P. (2007). Pengaturan Hak Mengajukan Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana Bagi Korban Kejahatan. Refika Aditama.

Tahir, H. D. (1982). Bab tentang Herziening di dalam KitabUndang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Wahyuni, Tri Ajeng. (2008). Kualifikasi Keadaan Baru (Novum) Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali: Analisa Putusan Mahkmah Agung Nomor 109/PK/PID/2007; Putusan Nomor 57/PK/PID/2005; Dan Putusan Nomor 39/PK/PID/2006, Skripsi Universitas Indonesia.

Yuvens, D. A. (2016). Penerapan Pasal 1 Ayat (2) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kontemporer. Jurnal Konstitusi, (13)4, 744-765.