PEMASANGAN ALAT PERAGA KAMPANYE TANPA SEIZIN PEMILIK TEMPAT

Brahmantya Putra Hutapea; Jeremia Putra Ferliano Simandjuntak; Freidelino P.R.A. de Sousa

doi:10.56301/juris.v8i2.1291

Brahmantya Putra Hutapea Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia
Jeremia Putra Ferliano Simandjuntak Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia
Freidelino P.R.A. de Sousa Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i2.1291

Keywords: Komisi Pemilihan Umum, State Administrative Decisions, Negative Fictitious

Abstract

The Campaigns as a part of the stages of elections, are regulated by KPU Regulation Number 23 of 2018 concerning General Election Campaigns. However, the implementation of the campaign carried out by the campaign participants, was not in line with the provisions of campaigns, one of which was the installation of campaign props without the permission of the owner of the place. Campaign props that are part of the election should also be supervised by the KPU. If the installation of campaign props does not follow the provisions and then no action is taken by the KPU to issue a decision, then for this act of silence, the KPU is deemed to have issued a decision that is the same as a written State Administrative Decree containing a rejection which is referred to as a negative or fictitious negative decision. These violations can be resolved through Bawaslu as an institution that is given authority by-laws, one of which is to receive, examine, review, and decide on administrative election violations. Apart from that, when the process in Bawaslu still did not result solution, the process can be resolved by the PTUN.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. (2015). Teori dan Praktik Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca-Amandemen. Jakarta : Prenadamedia Group.

Amiruddin, & Asikin Z. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo.

Anwar, A.H. (2019). Peran Bawaslu dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Pemilu. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 3 (2), 76. Diperoleh dari https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/327192961.pdf

Basah, S. (1985). Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia. Bandung : Alumni.

Dewa, M.J. (2011). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Kendari : Unhalu Press.

Is, M.S., & Budianto K. (2021). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta : Kencana.

Ja’far M. (2018). Eksistensi dan Integrasi Bawaslu dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu. Madani Legal Review, 2 (1), 61. 10.31850/malrev.v2i1.332

Marbun S.F. (1997). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administrasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Liberty.

Marzuki P.M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum (Eds. Revisi). Yogyakarta : Prenadamedia Group.

Rodding B. (2017). Keputusan Fiktif Negatif dan Fiktif Positif dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 1 (1), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v1i1.18328

Suryanti D. (2020). Problematik Hukum Penentuan “Tindakan Faktual” Sebagai Obyek Sengketa Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Fakultas Hukum Univerisitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, 20. Diperoleh dari https://www.academia.edu/43985048/PROBLEMATIKA_HUKUM_PENENTUAN_TINDAKAN_FAKTUAL_SEBAGAI_OBYEK_SENGKETA_PADA_PERADILAN_TATA_USAHA

Triwulan T., & Widodo I.G. (2014). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia (Eds. Ke-2). Jakarta : Kencana Pramedia Grup.

Yuliani E.T. (2020). Perbandingan Antara Konsep Fiktif Negatif dalam UU 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Konsep Fiktif Positif dalam UU 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. University of Bengkulu Law Journal, 6 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.5.1.1-11