MENAKAR JURIMETRI DALAM SISTEM CIVIL LAW: ANALISIS TEORETIS DAN TANTANGAN PENERAPAN

Gunawan Widjaja; Wagiman; Mesa Indra Naiborhu

doi:10.56301/juris.v9i2.1733

Gunawan Widjaja Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia
Wagiman Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia
Mesa Indra Naiborhu Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v9i2.1733

Keywords: Civil law, Common law, Jurimetrics, Quantitative analysis

Abstract

The development of legal science has experienced a shift from a normative approach to an empirical approach, along with the increasing complexity of legal issues in society. jurimetri, as a quantitative approach to legal analysis, combines statistical and computational methods to understand patterns in court decisions and evaluate the effectiveness of regulations. Despite its rapid development in the common law system, its application in the civil law system still faces conceptual and practical challenges. The prescriptive nature of civil law and its reliance on codification are the main obstacles to adopting this method. This article discusses the extent to which jurimetrics can be applied in civil law legal systems, highlighting the fundamental differences between the two legal systems as well as the epistemological challenges that arise. The research utilizes a juridical-normative approach with a conceptual analysis of the relevance of jurimetrics in a written norm-based legal system. The results of the study show that although jurimetrics faces various obstacles, its application is still possible as a tool for legal analysis, especially in evaluating regulations, predicting legal trends, and increasing the efficiency of the justice system. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more flexible methods so that jurimetrics can contribute to the civil law legal system without sacrificing the principle of legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Colombo, B. A., et al. (2017). Challenges when Using Jurimetri in Brazil - a Survey of Court. Future Internet, 9(68).

Gupta, V. K. (1995). Use of Jurimetrics in Judicial Behavior Research. National Law School Journal, 7(1), Article 10.

Hart, H. L. A. (2016). Konsep hukum (M. Khozim, Terj.). Penerbit Nusa Media. (Karya asli diterbitkan tahun 1997).

Holmes Jr., O. W. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10(457). (Catatan: Penomoran "457" diinterpretasikan sebagai halaman awal, dan volume diidentifikasi sebagai 10 berdasarkan standar penerbitan Harvard Law Review saat itu, meskipun aslinya hanya mencantumkan 457. Jika 457 adalah volume, formatnya menjadi 457(4).)

Kelsen, H. (2013). Essays in legal and moral philosophy (B. A. Sidharta, Terj.). (Catatan: Nama penerbit tidak dicantumkan dalam referensi asli, sehingga dihilangkan. Tahun 2013 dianggap tahun publikasi terjemahan yang digunakan).

Loevinger, L. (1949). Jurimetrics - The next step forward. Minnesota Law Review, Journal of the State Bar Association, 33(5).

Losano, M. (n.d.). Jurybernetics: Genesis and structure of a discipline. Cambridge University Press.

Mertokusumo, S. (2018). Penemuan hukum sebuah pengantar. Cahaya Atma Pusaka.

Meuwissen. (2022). Tentang pengembangan hukum, ilmu hukum, teori hukum dan filsafat hukum (B. A. Sidharta, Terj.). Percetakan Refika Aditama.

Meyer, P. (1966). Jurimetrics: The scientific method in legal research. The Canadian Bar Review, La Revue Du Barreau Canadien, XLIV(1).

Praja, J. S. (2014). Teori hukum dan aplikasinya. Pustaka Setia.

Prasetyo, T. (2018). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Rajawali Press.

Qomar, N. (2010). Perbandingan sistim hukum dan peradilan. Penerbit Refleksi.

Schubert, G. A. (1959). Quantitative analysis of judicial behavior. Bureau of Social and Political Research Michigan State University.

Shodiq, M. D. (2023). Perbandingan sistem hukum. Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia.

Siems, M. (2018). Comparative law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Singh, R., et al. (n.d.). Research methodology, jurimetrics: The science of law. Pathshala & National Mission on Education through ICT (NME-ICT) India.

Sirait, M. (2021). Ilmu politik hukum dari masa ke masa. Deepublish.

Soemitro, R. H. (1979). Pengenalan mengenai penggunaan jurimetri dalam bidang hukum. Hukum dan Pembangunan, 9(2).

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2017). A realistic theory of law. Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, B. M. (1982). A critique of Lee Loevinger’s 'Jurimetrics – The next step forward'. Dalhousie Law Journal, 7(1), Article 7.