MEMBANGUN GUGATAN YANG SAH: ANALISIS PENGARUH KEJELASAN OBJEK DAN PEMENUHAN UNSUR-UNSUR GUGATAN DALAM PROSES LITIGASI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI TANGERANG

Gunawan Widjaja; Iriaty Khairul Ummah

doi:10.56301/juris.v9i2.1736

Gunawan Widjaja Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia
Iriaty Khairul Ummah Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v9i2.1736

Keywords: Civil lawsuit, Niet ontvankelijk verklaard, Posita and petitum, Procedural law, Tangerang District Court

Abstract

A civil lawsuit serves as a formal legal instrument that must be systematically drafted in accordance with procedural and substantive requirements under Indonesian civil procedural law. This study aims to examine the essential elements of a valid lawsuit and to assess how the implementation of these requirements affects judicial decisions at the Tangerang District Court. The research employs a normative and empirical legal approach. Normative data were obtained through legal literature and statutory analysis, while empirical data were drawn from civil case decisions published in 2024 through the Case Tracking Information System (SIPP). The findings reveal that inconsistencies between the posita and petitum, along with unclear identification of the object of dispute, are the main reasons for lawsuits being declared inadmissible (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) or rejected. Out of 789 examined cases, 442 were granted, while 120 were dismissed as inadmissible and 16 were rejected. These outcomes reflect the significant impact of procedural compliance on case resolution and underscore the importance of technical precision in lawsuit drafting. The study affirms that drafting a coherent and complete lawsuit is not merely a procedural formality, but a vital component of legal accountability and access to justice. As such, strengthening the capacity of legal practitioners and law students in the formulation of civil lawsuits should be a key focus in legal education and professional development in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Achmad. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Kencana.

Dewi, Ayu. (2023). Problematika Posita dan Petitum dalam Praktik Litigasi Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 12(1), 55–70.

Dworkin, Ronald. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.

Fuller, Lon L. (1969). The Morality of Law (Revised Edition). Yale University Press.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (2016). Hukum Acara Perdata: Asas dan Praktik di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Herzien Indonesisch Reglement (HIR).

Kelsen, Hans. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. Diterjemahkan oleh Max Knight. University of California Press.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (1970). Putusan Nomor 492 K/Sip/1970.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (1980). Putusan Nomor 1075 K/Sip/1980.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Nursolih, Enjang. (2023). Analisis Penyusunan Surat Gugatan. Jurnal Galuh Justisi, 11(2), 111–125.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.

Prinst, Darwan. (2004). Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Praktik. Djambatan.

Radbruch, Gustav. (2006). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.

Reglement op de Rechtsvordering (RBg).

Republik Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata).

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Retnowulan Sutantio & Oeripkartawinata, Iskandar. (2021). Analisis Gugatan Tidak Jelas dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(2), 175–192.

Sarjiyati, Dwi. (2022). Sinkronisasi Struktur Gugatan dalam Perspektif Keadilan Prosedural. Jurnal IUS, 10(3), 351–370.

Sinaga, Dara Sari & Syahputra, Akmaluddin. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard dalam Perkara Gugatan Kurang Pihak. Jurnal Hukum UNISSULA, 39(1), 77–90.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2018). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Subekti, R. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Subekti, Victor Ary & Marbun, Rocky. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Turut Tergugat dalam Gugatan Wanprestasi dan Sita Jaminan. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(5), 632–640.

Wahyuni, Willa. (2022). Perbedaan Posita dan Petitum dalam Isi Gugatan. Diakses dari: https://www.hukumonline.com.

Zainal, Firdaus. (2022). Legal Reasoning Terhadap Batasan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium dalam Putusan Perkara Perdata. Journal of Lex Theory, 3(1), 45–56.