KEABSAHAN INFORMED CONSENT SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERSIDANGAN TINDAK PIDANA KESEHATAN

Ni Wayan Diah Sukmadewi; I Made Wirya Darma; I Nyoman Budiana; Putu Eva Ditayani  Antari

doi:10.56301/juris.v9i2.1816

Ni Wayan Diah Sukmadewi Universitas Pendidikan Nasional
I Made Wirya Darma Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Nyoman Budiana Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia
Putu Eva Ditayani Antari Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v9i2.1816

Keywords: Validity, Informed Consent, Evidence, Health Crime

Abstract

In health crimes, informed consent is often presented as evidence in court. However, the validity of informed consent is often debated, because informed consent is evaluated based on formal aspects, namely the existence of a document signed by the patient or their family. Technically, this is considered sufficient to prove consent to medical treatment. The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the validity of informed consent as evidence in medical malpractice trials. The research method adopted in this study is normative legal research through a legislative approach, applying Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health and the Criminal Procedure Code. This study uses a descriptive analysis technique. The results show that informed consent can be classified as documentary evidence and circumstantial evidence in court. As documentary evidence, informed consent takes the form of a written document containing a signature. On the other hand, as circumstantial evidence, informed consent refers to its relevance to witness testimony and expert testimony related to the criminal act that occurred. Therefore, the validity of informed consent is evaluated not only from a formal aspect but also from a substantive aspect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustini, S., Wahyudi, A., & Priyatno, A. D. (2024). Analisis Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan terhadap Kepuasan Pasien. Jurnal ‘Aisyiyah Medika, 9(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36729/jam.v9i2.1262

Antari, P. (2022). Pemidanaan terhadap Pekerja Seks Komersial melalui Aplikasi Michat. Jurnal Selat, 9(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v9i2.4386

Budiana, I. N., & Kasmariadi, I. (2024). Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Keterangan Terdakwa dalam Persidangan Online. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 6(1), 628–638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v2i2

Darma, I., Mahadnyani, T., Kurniawan, I., & Driss, B. (2025). Health Criminal Law as an Instrument to Protect Human Rights: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Algeria. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 7(1), 68–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v7n1.p68-97

Flora, H. S. (2024). Fungsi Informed Consent bagi Dokter dan Pasien dalam Tindakan Medis. Fiat Iustitia: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 101–112. https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/FIAT/article/view/3546

Muhaimin, M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (F. Hijriyanti, Ed.). Mataram University Press.

Pebrina, A. R., Najwan, J., & Alissa, E. (2022). Fungsi Penerapan Informed Consent sebagai Persetujuan pada Perjanjian Terapeutik. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Bussiness Law, 3(3), 468–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v3i3.18966

Sidi, R. (2021). Kedudukan Informed Consent pada Pelayanan Pasien di Rumah Sakit. IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 1(2), 214–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v1i2.182

Sudarta, G., Darma, I., & Chansrakaeo, R. (2023). Corrective Justice for Medical Personnel Who Violate the Law: Where Is the Professional Organizations Involvement? Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 22(1), 386. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.2.3657

Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum (M. Tajuddin, Ed.). Publika Global Media.