ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMUFAKATAN JAHAT DALAM MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA OLEH ANAK

  • Yelli Sri Wahyuni Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Sukmareni Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Syaiful Munandar Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Keywords: Verdict, Evil Consensus, Narcotics Crime, Children

Abstract

Narcotics Crime has occurred a lot in Indonesia. One of those who commit narcotic crimes is a child. Parents are obliged to fulfill the rights of children so as not to fall into drugs and promiscuity. As is the case with the defendant Fajar Bumi Putra who has been sentenced by the Payakumbuh District Court judge, but the problems and objectives of this study are to analyze 1) The basis for the judge's consideration of the Evil Conspiracy case Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN-Pyh in imposing a sentence on a child who commits a narcotic crime. 2) The basis in what case is a child who commits a narcotic crime under number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Pyh regarding Evil conspiracy committed by children is in accordance with the Law.. Based on the results In this study, the authors suggest efforts to prevent narcotics crime, protect children's values ​​and educate children so they don't fall prey to narcotics and promiscuity by judges and law enforcement officials such as public prosecutors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief Gosita, Masalah Perlindungan Anak, Akademika Pressindo: Jakarta, 1985.

Arnas, Y., Sutarjo, M., & Fajarianto, O. (2022). Differences of Students' Mathematics Learning Results using Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Expository Methods on Materials Build A Flat of A Rquange. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(2), 146-150.

Bismar Siregar, Abdul Hakim Garuda Nusantara, Suwanti Sisworahardjo, Arif Gosita, Hukum dan Hak-Hak Anak, Rajawali: Jakarta, 1986

Chainur Arrasjid, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum, PT Sinar Grafik: Jakarta, 2000

Fajarianto, O., Tresnawati, N., Wulandari, T. C., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Differences of Mathematics Learning Results between Make a Match Cooperative Methods and Expository Methods. EDUTEC: Journal of Education And Technology, 6(1), 141-149.

Hukum Acara Pidana, Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya: Bandung, 2007

Laden Marpaung, Proses penanganan perkara pidana bagian kedua, Sinar Garfika: Jakarta, 1995

Mohammad Taufik Makarao, Wenny Bukamo, dan Syaiful Azri, 2013, Hukum Perlindungan Anak dan Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

P.A.F Lamintang dan Theo Lamintang, Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, loc.cit., Lilik Mulyadi, Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana, Liberty: Yogyakarta, 1996.

Pengadilan Negeri Payakumbuh, Putusan Nomor 1/ Pid.Sus-Anak /2021/PN Pyh

R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar- Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia: Bogor, 1980.

Sudarto, Pemidanaan, Pidana, dan Tindakan, dalam Lokakarya Masalah Pembaharuan Kodifikasi Hukum Pidana Nasional (buku I), diselenggarakan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman: Jakarta, 1984

Undang-Undang No. 11 Penjelasan Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

UU No. 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Tindak-tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia, loc.cit.

Published
2023-12-10
How to Cite
Wahyuni, Y. S., Sukmareni, & Munandar, S. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMUFAKATAN JAHAT DALAM MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA OLEH ANAK. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris, 7(2), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i2.926